Kiflaam Posted July 25, 2014 Author Share Posted July 25, 2014 I wasn't saying to use anything,skimpy or otherwise, i was saying to search using your body model type,if you use UNP use it as the keyword,if you use CBBE use it as your keyword.The amour has to be made for your body to be able to see your body in it,under it,around it or through it. :rolleyes: its all greek to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsharaMeradin Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 I think I understand what you want. My custom player body mod uses UNP Curvy v1 nude (no longer available aside from in my mod)Using variations of Petrovich's armors and lingerie as found in UNP Clothing Merchants (based on UNP Cuvry v1), I can equip a variety of items. If I choose to equip the lingerie, there are modified forms of the associated shirt & vest that include any bits of the lingerie that would be visible. So then I have the option to wear all the outer pieces with underwear visible where it would be or to wear all the outer pieces without any underwear visible. I designed that particular setup because at the time I was using my lingerie replacer based on Petrovich's lingerie and it irked me to no end that when I equipped the shirt (which used the body slot same as the underwear replacer) that my girl would suddenly have no undies. But beyond that, I know of no other setup that could account for any outerwear that shows exposed bits or undies as one might desire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gandalftw Posted July 25, 2014 Share Posted July 25, 2014 I wasn't saying to use anything,skimpy or otherwise, i was saying to search using your body model type,if you use UNP use it as the keyword,if you use CBBE use it as your keyword.The amour has to be made for your body to be able to see your body in it,under it,around it or through it. :rolleyes: its all greek to me Apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiflaam Posted July 28, 2014 Author Share Posted July 28, 2014 actually, it wasnt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gandalftw Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 Cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts