Bloodreaper Posted October 30, 2010 Share Posted October 30, 2010 Floydian thats an awesome example of an artistic image. Not only is it awesome, but youre not exploiting female nudity (or almost nudity, since the latest rule) in your image Well, as NDomenique stated. There is a fine line betwen down right rude porn images and erotic art. The later is under no form exploiting nudity. One's body is something to be proud of and can be part of really nice art pieces...that and the fact there are no real females in most if not all Oblivion-themed pics :tongue: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ffa1mf Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 Art, unfortunately, is in the eye of the beholder. What is art to one is trash to another. The amount or presence of nudity isn't a measurement of pornography or art. Art should evoke something in the viewer, be it emotional, intellectual or whatever. This is also why the rationalization for bad art is that the artist can simply declare that the viewer who doesn't like it is sufficiently unsophisticated or unintellignet to be unable to appreciate the artists "art". As the original post states, the issue isn't nudity or pornography, its about art and the abundance of images that consist of a grotesquely manipulated female body clad in a wholly unrealistic manner whose only purpose seems to be to evoke an ego satisfying response (wow, what a babe, I'd like to meet her) or for satisfaction of some erotic fantasy. Now thats pornography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackerrR Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Floydian, that picture is amazing! well done :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts