hoofhearted4 Posted August 8, 2011 Author Share Posted August 8, 2011 so SLI is Nvidia whereas crossfire is AMD? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 Yes thats correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoofhearted4 Posted August 8, 2011 Author Share Posted August 8, 2011 ooo, but a board thats ready for crossfire cant handle two Nvidia boards in SLI? thats dumb :tongue: soo changing in this board: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131754 my new price is $1347.34...not too shabby. and thats with monitor, keyboard, and speakers...this is a thousand dollar build without those items (considering many ppl building PCs already have those pieces..sometimes...and thats not counting Ram since i have it already) im happy with that :) i hope it doesnt change in price too much by the time im ready to build it (unless its cheaper)...besides the CPU being double since i hear bulldozer will be like $380 or something, ill pay it if its worth it, if not hello 1100T :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 (edited) Its also not coming out until next year sometimes possibly with the same release date as windows8. So are you getting win 7 pro like i mentioned its worth every penny.I suggest get the oem version :thumbsup: the last one was just a exaple. price drop. http://www.newegg.co...N82E16832116992 For any Amd phenom 64bit is highly required, especially with lots of ram. Edited August 8, 2011 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoofhearted4 Posted August 8, 2011 Author Share Posted August 8, 2011 (edited) you must not have read my last post. i get W7 Pro FREE from school. im in computer science at my local college and we get x32 and x64 bit for free as well as a bunch of other software. (reference again: msdnaa.com) also last i knew, bulldozer release date is speculated at September 19th sources:http://lenzfire.com/2011/07/amd-bulldozer-release-date-finalised-24475/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulldozer_%28processor%29 (half way down, first line under Processors)..unfortunately, the site reference for Wikipedia is in Japanese. Edited August 8, 2011 by hoofhearted4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted August 8, 2011 Share Posted August 8, 2011 (edited) I'm hoping they'll come out with the 16core cpu's as well, to me a 6 core cpu versus a 8 core cpu thats probably not going to be Socket am3+ isn't worth it in my opinion. Waits for the 16 core bulldozer cpu's :thumbsup: http://news.softpedi...st-213103.shtml I'm hoping there will be a mainstream version of it, Edited August 8, 2011 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoofhearted4 Posted August 9, 2011 Author Share Posted August 9, 2011 i have no use for 16 cores, and id assume its expensive, and i wouldnt pay it anyways. ill settle for 8 cores, and if it turns out its not worth it ill settle for the 1100t. afaik, there are only 4, 6 and 8 core versions of bulldozer (at least for the consumer market) and what do u mean it prolly wont be AM3+? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted August 9, 2011 Share Posted August 9, 2011 (edited) It was only because t was a new phenom, these new cpu's have a new name branded all over them the fx. It could be that they use some other socket other then am3+. Whenever they change the name of the cpu, its a garrentee it won't be socket am3. Remember the 6x stayed the same because it was a phenom branded cpu. its better then intel though, they change socket for every new cpu. Makes it harder to upgrade. Edited August 9, 2011 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoofhearted4 Posted August 10, 2011 Author Share Posted August 10, 2011 im confused... i thought bulldozer was AM3+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommanderCrazy Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 It is, Hoofhearted. Its AM3+, not AM3. They are different, but you can use AM3 processors on an AM3+ board, but not the other way around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now