Paxan_1 Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Ups, forgot to attach the file... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N3C14R Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 (edited) Stupid windows won't go above 7,9 my 350$ GPU is getting the same score as them 1000$ 590's and whatnot (and that 580 up there)lolWindows Experience index has always been a bias and inaccurate way to calculate performance. Your 2500k gets the same score as my 860, which is like second slowest i7 produced. The 920 being the lowest end. Edited August 5, 2011 by N3C14R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illiad86 Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 (edited) Heh, seems like everyone gets the 5.9...cursed HDDs :P Erk, really gotta clean out my C: drive...barely anything left :P http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv200/Illiana86/Untitled-2.jpg weird how it says DX10 when the card is DX11...stupid Windows.... Edited August 5, 2011 by Illiad86 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
draconix Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 7.9 isn't a bias or a glitch or a problem. Check out the help file. :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted August 5, 2011 Author Share Posted August 5, 2011 (edited) One thing i love about the Phenom 6x is its amazing power saving feature, it declocks on the fly and you can overclock on the fly as well. It declacks around 800mhz when on standby mode when in idle, once something starts using cpu it jumps back up to 3.30ghz on the fly. gpu z was i thought was reading the stats wrong but its correct. http://www.image-share.com/upload/831/77.jpg See what i mean :thumbsup: So the experience index could be reading the lower clocks, hmm i wonder if it jumps during the test, i mean it doesn't use that much cpu really. Edited August 5, 2011 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nysba Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 No, it's not reading the lower clocks... If it's even reading any. Maybe it just takes your specs and downloads the score from a website >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted August 5, 2011 Author Share Posted August 5, 2011 (edited) Hmm maybe have you tried doing it offline to test your theory, its a good chance it reads your hardware. Edited August 5, 2011 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommanderCrazy Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 (edited) Contributing.Oh btw, it seems that ALL hdd's get 5.9, as i am using a WD Velociraptor @ 10,000RPM.http://i56.tinypic.com/2yltnhd.png EDIT: Also, my GPU is DX11, not 10. Stupid windows. Edited August 5, 2011 by CommanderCrazy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted August 5, 2011 Author Share Posted August 5, 2011 (edited) Contributing.Oh btw, it seems that ALL hdd's get 5.9, as i am using a WD Velociraptor @ 10,000RPM.http://i56.tinypic.com/2yltnhd.png EDIT: Also, my GPU is DX11, not 10. Stupid windows.Nice setup almost identical to mine except the 2 extra sticks of ram :thumbsup: except hs]d space and resolution. I did a benchmark and encoded a 1080P video, games walkthrough type about 30m in duration. Took 20m to complete.:thumbsup: audio 4100 320kbps.High bitrate 4000 Edited August 6, 2011 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paxan_1 Posted August 6, 2011 Share Posted August 6, 2011 Hmmm, if i read your hdd score...., i think i need a new primary one. I'm a little surprised it's that slow in comparison to yours. :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now