Acebopata Posted June 30, 2012 Share Posted June 30, 2012 I could do better.Well? I'm waiting. Here's one idea Take 10% of the national tax, and set it aside to give to those who need expensive medical treatment that is either not covered by their insurance, or who do not have health insurance. send a man or woman, (who is not tied to politics, and who is trustworthy and honest,) for every 500 to 10000 square miles (Depending on population,) and place him or her in charge of justly distributing this money to the needy. Let him or her hire good helpers, as trustworthy as him or her, and have these insure the money is given only to those who need it and that the money is used as such. Like-wise, take 10% of the taxes in each state, and give it to those who can not afford assurance, and wish to do so. Place a honest and trustworthy man or woman in charge of this money, one for every 3-10 counties, again, to be determined by population, and likewise, let him or her hire honest and trust-worthy men and women to over see that the money is given to those who honestly need it and for the right purposes. Let this money be used for things, such as prescriptions, vaccines, and emergency treatments, as well as dental care. Place strong consequences on any who purposely misuse this money, such as to get prescription drugs to sell on the market. For everyone else who can afford it, let them buy their assurance freely, and force them not. Place necessary requirements on companies to prevent them from denying anyone due to per-conditions, and to insure they keep a fair price for their services. Let them compete on the market, but make certain they do not scam their customers. Of course, this is a plan if you want the government to help out, while not interfering with your rights. Using this method might work, but implementing it in a nation with trillions in debt, corrupt politicians, and various other problems would be the challenge, especially if avoiding tax increases, however, it can be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beriallord Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 (edited) And our cancer insurance was completely cut, Having a special cancer insurance you have to pay extra for is kinda f***ed up sounding to me. It was consisted of more than you think. Not only did it cover ALL expenses up to a 3 million dollar limit, but it also covered your salary should you get cancer and not be able to work for 1-2+ years while you undergo treatment. It used to be free but now its like $10/week. I paid for it anyway. I know that colon cancer and prostate cancer both run in my family. I had a doctor tell me that I have about a 60% chance of getting colon cancer if my father and grandfather both had it. Grandfather died from it, and my father has had colon polyps removed on 2 separate 3 year screenings. And they don't even charge me extra for the cancer insurance for being a higher risk. I could also choose the hospital I wanted to go to for cancer treatment. Edited July 1, 2012 by Beriallord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beriallord Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 (edited) OBAMACARE is 100% pure pork, designed only to line the insurance companies' pockets. We were duped! What we all NEED is a bill that makes the insurance companies FALL BACK INTO LINE. -snip- But such a bill will NEVER BE PASSED because WASHINGTON POLITICS AS USUAL is too entrenched with BIG INSURANCE COMPANY LOBBYISTS. WHY ISN'T OBAMA LISTENING????/ I actually agree with all that, minus the -snip- part. Part of the problem is if you force them too much, they will simply close their doors. And it would put private insurance companies out of business. They need to find a happy median with regulations, that won't just let them do whatever they want, but also not encourage them to go out of business. The way the regulations are currently setup is in a way where its designed to be non competitive. And this is working in favor of the insurance companies being able to hike rates on everyone. And now that you get fined for not having insurance, it only means they are going to be encouraged to start charging more for it, and not less regardless if more people enter the pool or not. More people entering the pool is only going to mean higher profits for the insurance companies and not lower rates for everyone. Edited July 1, 2012 by Beriallord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marxist ßastard Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 I actually agree with all that, minus the -snip- part. Part of the problem is if you force them too much, they will simply close their doors. And it would put private insurance companies out of business. They need to find a happy median with regulations, that won't just let them do whatever they want, but also not encourage them to go out of business.So you're saying OBAMACARE is too soft on the insurance companies, but my idea is too hard? Would you agree to something right in the middle between the two? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidus44 Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 Hugely amused today. Today is the 50th anniversary of Medicare in Canada. A special section of the newspaper today has reprinted a bunch of letters and commentaries from protesters against Medicare and its amazing how much they are like what I'm reading in this and other forums. I would think in a few years, if the system remains in the US, the arguments against changing the system will be just as passionate as they are now against it's implementation. I'm also very amused at the number of people who are posting they are moving to get out of "socialist" USA. I just hope Rush Limbaugh does move to Costa Rica and I can't wait to hear Bill O'Reilly apologize for being an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moveing Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 marharthAlso how many times do I need to post this. "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States" The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; To borrow money on the credit of the United States; To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States; To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures; To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States; To establish Post Offices and Post Roads; To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries; To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court; To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations; To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; Postoffice is mentioned. Army is mentioned. But public healthcare isn't mentioned. So, thats it. Its not in the powers of congress and thats it.But hey, a communist takeover is still a reason to celebrate for the lazy and poor as long as they think they will get something for free.America is gone. Once fought his independence it was brought back into the oldworld empire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eodx9000 Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 (edited) Does anyone think the fight is over...? How dumb can people be to think it's over and that SCOTUS Chief Justice Roberts entirely ruled in favor of the bill? The majority ruling was that it was unconstitutional on the basis of the Commerce clause that the government tried defending it with while ruling it only slightly constitutional on the basis of it imposing a tax. Ergo, he ruled on the definition of Obamacare and that the government is right to implement it - AS A TAX (which I should add is something that, constitutionally speaking anyways, must be started in the House of Representatives, not Senate), not for any other reason, defeating every argument the Obama regime had that it was anything but a tax. With the precedent John Roberts put forward, government will have to think long and hard about being able to force people out of inaction since not everything can be an argument of taxes (and Obamacare really isn't a tax according to Obama). Now it's in the GOP's hands to repeal, but this will not happen because Republicans are also owned by the same elite that own Democrats. Well, that isn't what I expected....... So, it seems the government can now legally force folks to buy a commercial product. Nice..... I wonder what's next.... Everyone has to buy a car, so the auto industry well do better? Everyone has to buy a house, so the housing market will recover?? Everyone has to buy oranges, so they will lead a healthier lifestyle? Read what I stated, John Roberts pulled a fast one on the federal government that can have lasting effects, IF the people are smart about it of course. No, the fight is far from over. This is only round one. The fight is now dependent on a smart populace. Okay, I've got a serious question: Have any of you actually read the PPACA – or even a summary of it – before declaring yourselves Internet experts on the subject? Until every single member of Congress has read the bill, there is no credibility in demanding people to read it before commenting on it. Summaries on the other hand are quite useless themselves. There's no reason whatsoever for a transparent government to write a bill anywhere longer than what the average citizen is willing to put up with casually. Edited July 2, 2012 by eodx9000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marharth Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 (edited) marharthAlso how many times do I need to post this. "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States" The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; To borrow money on the credit of the United States; To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States; To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures; To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States; To establish Post Offices and Post Roads; To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries; To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court; To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations; To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; Postoffice is mentioned. Army is mentioned. But public healthcare isn't mentioned. So, thats it. Its not in the powers of congress and thats it.But hey, a communist takeover is still a reason to celebrate for the lazy and poor as long as they think they will get something for free.America is gone. Once fought his independence it was brought back into the oldworld empire. Was it really that hard to miss "general welfare" in bold? Damn libs, standing up for the weak! Edited July 2, 2012 by marharth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwnedbyscope Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 I havent read any of the posts before this so please forgive my ignorance, but just to clear somethings up what was passed was not a bill nor a tax, it was a mandate that enacts a tax with no penalty. meaning that it is an optional tax, really meant for those who cannot buy healthcare from an insurance company. just my two cents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moveing Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Was it really that hard to miss "general welfare" in bold?That gives power to nothing. It has to be mentioned as a power of congress. If its not, its not a power of congress. Otherwise all the 14 powers would be meaningless because the first line of section 8 would give Government all the power to do whats mentioned there. You are not to dumb to get that, you don't wanna get that. Damn libs, standing up for the weak! Standing up for the weak? They don't stand up for the weak. They take from others by force to give it to those who they declair as "weak". People which live the life of kings compared to the rest of the world.What have you done lately to "stand up for the weak"? Gave them food and blankets? Social behavior comes not by force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts