Jump to content

What Did Skyrim Do Right?


AnkhAscendant

Recommended Posts

Its hard for someone else to get you point right when you don't have a point to being with.

No, it was you that never had a point. Slow down, and type better.

 

Proof

 

I find it funny that the attribute mod you linked to only has 88 endorsements.

 

One would think if people truly wanted them, or thought they were a good idea, it would have more downloads?

 

All your link has done is proven how much people detest the idea of attributes, only 88 endorsements? out of 2,00+ downloads?

 

apparently you are in the minority here when it comes to the belief that attributes are useful.

 

Indeed, even the mod author gave up on the mod.

Edited by sajuukkhar9000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You've been proven wrong multiple times, get over it. 3 sets of variables>2 sets.

Really, because it seems you have been proven wrong more when I showed, with the very numbers of the attribute system itself, how raising attributes does not add any real character diversity at all.

 

1+1+1 is not greater then 2, when at least one of those ones in a negative one.

Edited by sajuukkhar9000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've been proven wrong multiple times, get over it. 3 sets of variables>2 sets.

 

Plenty of threads on the TESF says otherwise in regards to attributes. Plenty want them back.

 

So by that logic. 3 balls weighing 3 ounces a piece have more mass than 2 bricks weighing 50 pounds a piece.

 

There's nothing here to prove mathematically, and if there was, you're doing a poor job of it.

 

We're discussing qualitative aspects, not quantitative.

 

As I previously said, your logic doesn't work here because it's purely based on one system having 3 aspects and another only having two.

 

and technically, skyrim has 3 systems too, perks, skills, and the placements of points into health, stamina, and magicka. so 3=3, so they must be the same in terms of character development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same skills, same perks, and attributes. That is more than same skills, same perks, no attributes. Apparently I am doing a poor job at explaining the most simplest math, since you guys cant seem to get it. Skyrim has three simple attribute derivatives which are nothing even close to attributes, so no, it isn't 3=3. Edited by Enatiomorph
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same skills, same perks, and attributes. That is more than same skills, same perks, no attributes. Apparently I am doing a poor job at explaining the most simplest math, since you guys cant seem to get it.

 

Obviously so.

 

but again, there are attributes in Skyrim. They're just simplified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same skills, same perks, and attributes. That is more than same skills, same perks, no attributes. Apparently I am doing a poor job at explaining the most simplest math, since you guys cant seem to get it.

 

Obviously so.

 

but again, there are attributes in Skyrim. They're just simplified.

No, there isn't. Theres stamina, health and magicka, the same three derivatives that were in Ob and Morrowind, and Dagger, etc.

Edited by Enatiomorph
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same skills, same perks, and attributes. That is more than same skills, same perks, no attributes. Apparently I am doing a poor job at explaining the most simplest math, since you guys cant seem to get it.

 

Obviously so.

 

but again, there are attributes in Skyrim. They're just simplified.

No, there isn't. Theres stamina, health and magicka, the same three things that were in Ob and Morrowind, and Dagger, etc.

 

well, you make a purely melee build, don't pour any points into magicka until level 30, then try swapping to using magicka exclusively and see how well you fare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...