Switch Posted June 25, 2004 Share Posted June 25, 2004 Tone it down a bit there ragnarok please. I'll close this if it starts turning into a "OMG TEH WARRIAR IS BETTER TAHN TEH MAGE!!!111!111" flaming thread. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Untouchable1 Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 it really doesnt matter because somewhere along the way even the burliest most rugged warrior would submit to the benefits of enchanted items. who could resist Umbra or the Ebony Mail? anyone who thinks a 'traditional' warlord would stick with bland steel or daedric weapons and armor should be snickered and sneered at upon passing an enchanter's house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_ragnarok702 Posted June 30, 2004 Author Share Posted June 30, 2004 A mage would paralyse you before you eve saw him due to ring of Invisibility CE. Then he'd cast damage healts 50 pts for 10 seconds dealing you 500 dmg. Then he'd cast it again. And again. And again. That means that sanctuary 100pts is only one thing that a mage has. Also, try combining it with 100% chameleon... :ph34r:Ok first of all the chance of succesfully paralizing my guy is like a 20% chance. There is also about a 40% chance that you could hit me with the damge spell. Second of all i have about 3000 health meaning 500 damage is not THAT great. My char also has constant effect restore health 20 points meaning i would not even take any damage from that spell. Also a spell like that would cost so much magicka to the point where you would only be able to cast it several times. And chameleon 100% only makes you invisible to NPC and creatures. If a NPC had 100% he would just looked sorta faded to the player. It would only be a matter of time before my char beat the &*%# out of the mage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Untouchable1 Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 *sighs, reluctantly accepting the fact that trying to beat any reason into this ignorant human is about as difficult as, well, beating an uber wizard with a bland orcish warrior guy* notice at NO TIME EVER did I blast the idea of an almighty bloodcraven daedric warlord... hey I've got an idea! to demonstrate what we mean, Ragnarok, lets take this to the RP forums eh? plus how the f... oh nevermind, i was gonna let loose with another verbal uzi but why waste my time on an inanimate object such as ragnarok... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeniorn Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 If you can use Royal Signet Ring (I suppose that you are using it since you have restore health 20 CE), I can sure use a ring 10 pts restore magicka CE. And BTW... Damage Health 50pts + Restore Health 20 pts = Damage Health 30 pts. What do you mean by "you wouldn't take any damage from the spell"? Also, how could you hit me if I cast Levitate 1 pts for 60 seconds and shoot you while levitating 50 feet above the ground? You think you can hit a mage that is levitating, has 100% chameleon, sanctuary 100pts, and a spell that can kill you in two shots? (I have all the spells I used as an example). Not mentioning that my mage has axe 100 heavy armor 100, full, enchanted daedric armor, and daedric battle axe wit shock dmg 20 pts when strikes, as a last resort, if you somehow manage to evade all my spells and jump high enough to hit me. Not to mention that I have ring of Invisibility CE... Which means you can't even see me. Of course, there are warriors that could beat any mage that exists, but there are also mages that can kill any fighters that exist. But one thing's sure - fighter cannot become a mage, but a mage can become a fighter. That kinda makes them a "better" class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_ragnarok702 Posted June 30, 2004 Author Share Posted June 30, 2004 i bet you 100 dollars my character could beat the poo out of yours only if there was a way to tell................... i would either relect or absorrb all your spells because i wear royal signet ring and am born under the antronach. With out spells you stand no chance. Even if you casted chameleon i could cast sight beacuse i have enough magicka and illusion to cast it plentry of times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UberBender Posted June 30, 2004 Share Posted June 30, 2004 ...i would either relect or absorrb all your spells because i wear royal signet ring... well anyone can get that ring and become practicly invinsible no matter the class Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_ragnarok702 Posted July 1, 2004 Author Share Posted July 1, 2004 not invincible to weapons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UberBender Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 if someone hit me with a weapon I could just cast santuary 100 points on myself or drain agility 100 points on you and wait for my health to regenerate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcstreet Posted July 1, 2004 Share Posted July 1, 2004 i bet you 100 dollars my character could beat the poo out of yours only if there was a way to tell................... i would either relect or absorrb all your spells because i wear royal signet ring and am born under the antronach. With out spells you stand no chance. Even if you casted chameleon i could cast sight beacuse i have enough magicka and illusion to cast it plentry of times. sorry man no disprespect...but you dont like mages or magic that much do you????but thats a bit hipocritical ,imean look at what you said you were wear...you have items fit for a mage lord! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.