sixtofive Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 it's allright, no one will force you to believe the truth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalSnafu Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 Show me any article that says that....seriously, I want to know where you heard it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrow_Diet Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 Har har har, I've found a topic after my own heart...Any way, no, there is no american article that says that they found nuclear warheads. The closest thing they probably got to a warhead is a sparkler. -_^Seriously though, there was a good reason to believe that there was WMD in Iraq, because it COULD have been true, but we (americans) should've listened to the weapon inspectors when they said that they didn't find any thing. IN FACT, it took around 8 months for the media to get word of the WMD report. Which, when you read it, sounds like some one wrote it up in five minutes. There is no WMD in Iraq. We had a good reason to enter, just not the reason the Bush Ad gave the world. He should've said, "We need to get rid of a dictator, who's with me?"All these should've's... blah.. sorry.There, I've said it. Please don't flame me for my spelling ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zmid Posted July 26, 2004 Author Share Posted July 26, 2004 There is no WMD in Iraq. We had a good reason to enter, just not the reason the Bush Ad gave the world. He should've said, "We need to get rid of a dictator, who's with me?" Bingo. Got it in one. Please don't flame me for my spelling y shud I phlaim u four yoor speeling? :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surian Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 If you can't spell a word and you know it (I"ve mispelled things by accident) then you should use 1337 5P33K. That way you can just claim it's "creative" instead of just being stupid :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peregrine Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 No, then you just look even more stupid and tempt the Hellbird into using the edit button on the REST of your post to match..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrow_Diet Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 Oh boy, we wouldn't want that.... ^_^Any who, back on subject ---------V I can't remember and I can't find what the Bush Ad had said was in Iraq <_< . Was it nukes? I can't seem to find any credible( :ph34r: ) sources that tell me what he/they actually said was there.Heh, what ever it was, I'm pretty damn sure they're not gonna find it. On a side note, ok, fine, I'll only appoligize for spelling if some one calls me on it. :bleh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImmortalSnafu Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 Well sixtofive must have lots of evidence of warheads in Iraq....Especially since he hasn't responded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixtofive Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 I originally heard the story on a radio news program, and have been looking for a documented copy of it. Here is the story that i found: http://cayankee.blogs.com/cayankee/2004/07...es_with_nu.html many are questioning whether or not this is actually true, but the main reason I believe it comes from a couple of friends of mine that are over there right now. They said that there has been signifigant pressure to try to cover this up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrow_Diet Posted July 26, 2004 Share Posted July 26, 2004 If the report were accurate officials wouldn't have to be checking it.Iraq's Interior Ministry dismissed as "stupid" a report in a local newspaper on Wednesday that said three nuclear missiles had been found near the town of Tikrit. and the doosy UPDATE: Betsy and Glen are skeptical, as I am. Dude, the guy who wrote it doesn't even think so.No Nukes. EDIT: Another thing. How long have we been holding Baghdad? and it took use how long to find these things AFTER the capture of Saddam? Bush would jump at the chance to be right, I don't see him all over this. Hey, I'M from California (now Texas) and I don't even believe this crap. I'm done flaming. May the Bird From Hell have mercy on me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.