antonkr

I like to see faces that are so seemingly familiar on these forums, although I barely most here anymore.

I am just waiting on Mugabe to go at this point.

Freedom of speech means just that, freedom of speech. Giving the government, or anyone the right to restrict on it is a terrible idea, for obvious reasons.

It works. But Skyrim doesn't I wish it was summer already!

Long distance relationships almost never end well. Friendships? Yes. Relationships... well it depends on how much you are willing to trust the other person. I would never go for it personally. This is very important also. You might not realize what you are getting into, with the mistake causing a verrrrrrrrryy bad break up.

Quite simple, or is it? 6÷2(3)

Ubisoft's DRM is absolutely awful, and like all of DRM it doesn't stop piracy at all, just annoys the paying customer.

Won't work. With our all-volunteer military we have now, we are still running short on soldiers for the field. Programs like "Stop-Loss", and extended tours of duty in warzones was the result. Our soldiers are already suffering from long, multiple deployments, and if we had fewer volunteer soldiers, and the draftee's were not to be deployed overseas.... it would only make the problem worse. Then why don't we stop deploying, minus the international US military bases we have, which is considered US territory. Well, for a time there, we had a couple wars going on..... we are down to one now.... more or less.... Quite frankly, I am of the opinion that we shouldn't have been in either country in any event. Iraq was not a threat, and we went to war based on lies, manipulation, and false information. We went to afghanistan ostensibly to get one guy.... but, seemed we enjoyed overthrowing legitimate governments so much, we wanted to do it again. Or, at least, some folks in government wanted to. The US needs to STOP playing at world police. We simply can't afford it, and honestly, we suck at it. Iraq is degenerating into a sectarian civil war..... and once we pull out of Afghanistan, it will go right back to what it was when we left..... with the addition of once again being the worlds largest exporter of opium. That's the problem. It isn't in our interests, whoever if you ask many Iraqis most would say that they are happy that America got involved, and like it better now. However this really shouldn't be our problem. We got enough of our own s*** to shovel. Back to the topic If we didn't get involved as much as we did, I think draft would be pretty damn amazing. I mean look at Switzerland, they pretty much got it right.

Won't work. With our all-volunteer military we have now, we are still running short on soldiers for the field. Programs like "Stop-Loss", and extended tours of duty in warzones was the result. Our soldiers are already suffering from long, multiple deployments, and if we had fewer volunteer soldiers, and the draftee's were not to be deployed overseas.... it would only make the problem worse. Then why don't we stop deploying, minus the international US military bases we have, which is considered US territory.

As an American, a draft into the United States military would be in the longterm, one of the best things we can do. It will teach beyond what any classroom can. All Americans will learn lifelong essential skills, such as communication, marksmanship, fitness, and most importantly leadership. A trained 'fit-for-service' type of Army would make it possible to cut down on the costs of our military right now. It can transform whiny, obese teenagers, who will be sitting their *** on welfare into adults America needs. Finer details >6 month training, including these skills, and of course skills needed to defend the Constitution of The United States of America. >Upon completing the training, and background checks, you will receive your military, current standard issue rifle. (if needed only semi-automatic) >For the next 2 years you must report to a military outpost, monthly for equipment, rifle condition check. >Yearly retraining, to adapt to new military platforms. >upon two years of service you keep all your equipment, and the rifle, provided you went to all the mandatory check ups, and after a post-service background check. Also >as a draftee you are never to be deployed outside of the United States. >There is still the usual non-draftee army for actually being deployed, just less of them

This is a very biased place to get an answer from.

Hello I happen to have ownership of a weird as hell motherboard which has 4 DDR2 slots and 2 DDR3 slots. I am using 2x2gb of DDR2 ram currently, now my question is, can I use the DDR3 slots and put an extra 2x2 ram sticks in it and use it alongside my DDR2 ram or no?

And I was there too!

Doors barricaded Rifles loaded Shotguns loaded Pistols loaded Grenades loaded Pocket ICBMs loaded Can food stocked

Is it wrong to ask for realistic looking visuals? Or are devs going to be NONONO GUYZ YOU DONT UNDERSTAND ITS ART STYLE! translated to, we are using a crappy engine that cannot do anything better since we are too poor. Art style =/= cartoony. Art style is the general direction of the game, while the engine is how the game is rendered. If the engine cannot render things properly, then you have the whole "cartoony thing". You already know TES' general art direction or art style, but you hate how it's rendered in this MMO. And frankly I don't care, it's an MMO. I don't expect much and the cost to generate that much detail will have to be factored in their budget. It shouldn't be an excuse to not push technology to it's limits. Even for an MMO.

If we are talking full on land invasion of the US Nope Never In My Lifetime An army attacking US would face a huge logistical nightmare with a gun pointed at them from any attic you can possibly see. But if that does happen, I am sure they will enjoy eating 7.62x54R.

Is it wrong to ask for realistic looking visuals? Or are devs going to be NONONO GUYZ YOU DONT UNDERSTAND ITS ART STYLE! translated to, we are using a crappy engine that cannot do anything better since we are too poor.

Have fun getting rejected a job over something you thought would be cool. Don't do it. Trust me man

Obsidian did a much better job in creating a better game then Bethesda did with 3. For once the game had actual gameplay without fake weapon accuracy shooting around your target. Yes some things were bad, but mostly it was a welcome improvement

Turn based works just fine, as for the combat speed all the devs have to do is to add options for controlling combat speed, just like they did in Fallout 1 and 2. i still fail to see the point in going backwards with a game. Turn based isometric games have no relevancy any more, there old, clunky and not to pleasing to the eye. And you are the reason for the developers to say "We want to appeal to cawadoooty audience" @Thor Simply because of the genre of Fallout. It wouldn't be any fun without some American 50s references and such. Plus more people play it in US then Canada, and US culture is more widely spread making it relate to much more people then if it was canadian. Although if you think about Justin Bieber ghoul, I would buy a Canadian-setting fallout game any day :D

Well considiring the fact that the British government bans pretty much any way to defend yourself, and you have to be 18 to purchase a plastic knife, I am not too surprised.