Jump to content

mr_siika

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mr_siika

  1. Does anyone know how I can report a stupid non-endorsement to the admins? It's just wrong that people say: there are files missing just because they are too stupid to install a mod properly. thx ms
  2. I agree. As you say, he new rating system reflects the popularity of a mod, not the quality. But then it's redundant, as the popularity is already measured by the amount of downloads.
  3. @bben46: I like the concept of different lists for different types of mods. Could not find those lists though. edit: Sorry it seems I did not read your post thoroughly enough. I liked the idea of different lists, but I can't say I find the "sorting" option helpful. Because the main problem remains: Old mods tend to have more "endorsements" than "new" mods. That's why the old rating system was fair, because every mod had a numeric value between 0 and 10, if it was 3 days or three years old. And the "top 25 from last two weeks" list is great, at least for the next 24 days :-) Will the "overall top 100" list be removed then? It would not make much sense keeping it then (especially with the new rating... but I already said that).
  4. Please don't get me wrong, but I think the new system is ridiculous and a bad idea. It disadvantages new mods over old mods. And that's a bad idea. Mods from 2006 which are not half as good as others from 2009 have, of course, much more endorsements than the newer ones. Why? Because in 2006 everyone downloaded everything they could get. Now, in 2009, the community is smaller, the mods get better and better and still most "top 100" mods are old. Great idea. I'm not sure if I should support this system any more by uploading my mods to TesNexus.
  5. I have a question. Some time ago I asked the Moderators to remove a rating from a file (Dwemer Skyship) of mine. Even though the comment/rating is now gone from the comments page, it still shows up in the ratings section. Normally it would be removed there as well, right? Guess the removal process did not work correctly. Could a moderator please change that? thanks in advance. ms
×
×
  • Create New...