kevindad1

I would support this but that first post turned me off. Sorry

Can you make it so that we can toggle was updated in a mod? As in have options whether or not you want to see which mod updated the image section, the description, etc. I just want to view what new versions of mods were uploaded. I don't care for the other stuff so I want to easily browse over what mod got updated since the NMM's check for new update feature is still broken most of the time.

Why not view by "Last updated"? Or am I misunderstanding you? I meant last updated shows that it updated either the file or the page. I want it so I can only see updated files.

Can you make it so we have the option to only view mods having updated files when viewing the "New recently" list? Seeing so many mods that only updated anything else is quite tedious.

Is there a proper way on how to follow this message? The link provided tells me how to enable mod support, manually installing mods, and uninstalling mods, but nothing about making edits to the ini for shorter loading times. So what exactly do I have to edit then?

In response to post #39915985. It's not just Fallout 4. It happened to me for New Vegas

In response to post #39675940. #39677215, #39679030 are all replies on the same post. Well I don't see the point in the website if Nexus exists. They could have just teamed up with this site and there would be no problems with modding.

In response to post #39665590. #39665740, #39665835, #39665905, #39673125, #39673695, #39679360, #39680290 are all replies on the same post. Lol.

In response to post #39675940. Does Bethesda know that Nexus exists?

In response to post #39665590. #39665740, #39665835, #39665905, #39673125 are all replies on the same post. Why would someone want to keep track of how long they use the CK? Seems like a weird complaint to me. (No offense)

In response to post #39597035. #39600400, #39600625 are all replies on the same post. "Do you know how many thousands upon thousands of man hours it takes to program enough bugs and glitches to produce a modern TES game?" Yeah, cause Bethesda is the only company in the world that made games with bugs in them. (I know you're joking, but I'm tired of seeing people make jokes similar to these)

In response to post #39602300. How would that benefit them?

In response to post #39589525. #39589815, #39590450, #39601020, #39602615 are all replies on the same post. 1. How is EA "still" getting away with it? It's more common to see people pissed at EA than at Bethesda. 2. Now I understand what you're saying about "paid mods". And now that I do know, I realize that what you said is just nonsense. You would rather use a (possibly) buggy mod that may mess up your game and/or give you crashes than the official less buggy (notice how I said less buggy) thing? Plus, it's only 5 bucks, you shouldn't really expect much.

In response to post #39585685. #39589650, #39606755 are all replies on the same post. That was from last year.

In response to post #39589525. #39589815, #39590450 are all replies on the same post. Who said that EA got away with that? Better yet, what does your reply have anything to do with what I said? (Minus the last part, that is obviously not true)