cyan49

Then thanks for improving the value of this suggestion.

Yes, I can, as always. But this was just the suggestion I voted for, and no one was talking about automating AI generated image detection. See OP's post, thanks.

So you like AI-generated thumbnails? Well I don't, so I'll answer "WHY?" in a simple way, but please understand that I'm not just talking about my preferences here.

Do you see that 2 of the 3 you showed have the AI-Generated Content tag? That's fine, and that's exactly what I and the OP want. Yes we should report these things. What if someone uses AI to make up their face for a thumbnail for their follower mod? What if someone uses AI to make a graphics overhaul mod look better than what it actually does? This also applies to some extent when users mistakenly believe that armor in an AI-generated thumbnail is an actual mod, but this example is redundant, I know. Well I've used up all my energy. I don't want to put in the effort to argue with people who don't see this as an issue, because you'll probably never agree and I'm not sure if my bad English explained the issue well enough.

Hey, can you link some examples of proper use of AI generated thumbnails here? It's easier and safer. I don't want to attack any specific mod author by publicly discussing it.

It may not matter to you, but I just want to specifically block mods with AI generated thumbnails.

That is, when a thumbnail shows something that is not part of the actual content.

I'm not the OP, but even if you've only recently tracked a mod, it's hard to find it on the Mods you're tracking page unless you remember the published date or last updated date or the exact name of the mod you're tracking. When I tracked a mod I found on the phone to download later, I had a hard time finding it again on the PC a few times.

Whether intentional or not, I feel it's puffery or clickbait. This isn't true for all mods with AI thumbnails, but yes, it can be misleading to users. Nexus' Best Practices for Mod Authors specifically recommends this when you can't get a screenshot from in-game to use as a thumbnail for your mod, although they don't mention AI.

This leads to users misinterpreting that a mod requires all those mods. It happens, I'm not lying, because it happened to me in the past. Experienced users may disagree, but this change should be in line with Nexus' policy of makes modding easy. Also, if I remember correctly, there were some feedbacks like this on the old feedback boards with many upvotes. Another related thing is that "Mods requiring this file" should exclude Translation tagged mods, because all Translation mods are accessible under "Translations" on the same mod page, I'm saying that Translation mods are listed twice unnecessarily. This causes the "Mods requiring this file" list to often swell to 100+ for popular mods, which is just inconvenient for users. Why does this mod require 100+ mods to install? This misreading happens. Same topic: For moderators, here is a link to an old popular feedback that is now unavailable, posted by Pickysaurus: https://feedback.nexusmods.com/posts/391/requirement-section-improvement

"Search comments..." is thin, pale grey text on a white background, probably enough that casual users will miss it, and it looks out of place with the current site design. Just changing the color and font, or adding the same magnifying glass icon as the quick search, would be a big improvement. Or placing it like the Add comment button, on the same line, would make sense. Sorry, this was originally my request on the old feedback board, but I can't remember if it got any response. I hope this feedback gets more priority now that Nexus is bringing back mod comment search and caring about contrast and accessibility.

Not sure. For me it popped up on the Skyrim SE game page, so I pasted in a 2,000 word love letter I'd written beforehand on a notepad. "... It's odd that you guys read the 3 on a 5 star rating as "positive" instead of "neutral". Please understand that this time I have given a "very bad" rating to emphasize that my feedback is negative, but only for this purpose." If you're curious, the survey basically asked users to rate something and then explain why. I was also asked which of Trending Mods/Popular Collections/More Mods/Media I was using (or interested? I don't remember the exact question), so I checked everything except Collections. And I was asked to report a bug, so I reported the one I remembered, but only remembered the other one after I closed it. I was also given the option to submit my discord username, but they said the survey would remain anonymous. That's all.

Luckily, I just found the Hot Jar survey and answered it, but after closing it, I remembered one thing to put in a bug report. On the mod page, including my mod, under Permissions and credits, Donation Points system, it says "Please log in to find out whether this mod is receiving Donation Points" but I am logged/signed in. The link leads to the following message: "You are already signed in." It's likely unrelated to the Mod Browsing Overhaul, but I can say with confidence that it at least happened after the site was updated.

Just reporting that the following page is not found, though I don't know if it worked before. It's in "See all" under "Notifications". https://www.nexusmods.com/games/notifications/collections

Can Nexus share a roadmap for improvements based on feedback later in a Monthly Roundup or something? I want to know what feedback catches your eye and what doesn't. I'm seeing them start to care about contrast these days. I believe I read that the option to change the default page or toggle specific content (in my case, it's Popular Collections) is planned, I'm not sure if I misread them though. I'd say twice about Popular Collections for visibility, I know it's a favorite of casual users and Nexus, but how much sense do you think it would make to have the top two Collections on permanent display there? Please just put them normally like More Mods and Media, and add the option to move them under More Mods or Media. To be clear, I don't like Collections but putting that aside, I am giving feedback on this discussion, Mod Browsing Overhaul, and this is a discussion, I would rather it be answered than ignored, even if my feedback is dismissed. My question is whether this kind of feedback was passed on to staff? (I don't mind if you answer this the way I suggested in the first line)