HomicidalGrouse

Heyyyyy, that's pretty good!

In response to post #71749438. #71760963 is also a reply to the same post. You got something against profit? People who provide a service (that you apparently find valuable in some way, evidenced by your presence here) getting paid?

ohai

Immersive Armors is a must-have mod for me. It was on my shortlist of mods I was waiting to be ported to SSE before even bothering to start a playthrough.

In response to post #64095256. " Members who are in the Supporter member group OR who consistently do not use Adblockers on Nexus Mods." Supporters don't see ads anyway. It's basically the whole point of being a supporter.

Leloo Dallas Multipass.

Anything you want.

Yet another entry.

Heeeeere's a comment!

beep beep boop

blet

Why not...

In response to post #56262141. #56262426, #56262576, #56262581, #56262936, #56263031, #56263146, #56266491, #56267106, #56267256, #56274311, #56277726 are all replies on the same post. Nothing is preventing people from continuing to not do that after the implementation of this system.

In response to post #55597599. #55598659 is also a reply to the same post. Comparing your personal distaste for a website's redesign to EA's MT implementation in a full-priced-with-DLC game is absolutely asinine...

In response to post #55569459. #55569819, #55576134, #55577769, #55583519 are all replies on the same post. Forums weren't killed by Facebook and Instagram, they were killed by Reddit. People started hating forums because they didn't want to sign up for a completely different forum every time they wanted to discuss something else. Reddit provides a forum-like platform where anyone can make a forum about pretty much anything, and nobody has to sign up for it again. They already have a reddit account, so they can join as many different forums discussing as many different topics as they wish with no extra sign-ups. No weird quirks to figure out from one forum to the next. Everything is largely consistent and you can browse around to as many different things as you want. These things aren't popular because all the normie CEOs want your info or whatever. They're popular because they're useful and convenient. People dislike them because they put on the rose-tinted glasses and let their nostalgia get the better of them.

Neato.

In response to post #55478623. #55478653, #55478708, #55478878, #55481343, #55484023, #55493693 are all replies on the same post. You still can. Above the mods list, there's a drop-down titled "refine results". Clicking it produces all of your category, keyword, etc filters. If anything, it's more functional, because now you can make all of your changes to your filter without it loading those changes after each click, allowing you to save time by applying your filter all at once. Short descriptions are supposed to be just that... Besides, there are 3 different view modes for mod pages, and two of them provide larger short description boxes. I've experienced neither of these issues. Have you submitted this as a bug in the tracker?

In response to post #55385813. #55403098, #55424833, #55429343, #55431058, #55452048, #55453283, #55453953, #55454268, #55460353, #55468303, #55478593 are all replies on the same post. Thankfully, you don't get to dictate other people's browsing habits.

In response to post #55478623. What functionality did you "lose"?

In response to post #55257103. #55257298, #55258328, #55258513, #55258928, #55259153, #55259388, #55259853, #55305193, #55330208, #55334878, #55338158, #55338403, #55338453, #55339968, #55342353, #55357393, #55364788, #55364973, #55368353, #55368878, #55369378, #55369603, #55369828, #55370763 are all replies on the same post. People who dislike things are always louder than those who like them or don't care. Especially on the internet. I'd bet money the vast majority of Nexus visitors don't even bother reading these news articles, let alone commenting on it.

In response to post #55312878. #55313528 is also a reply to the same post. No. It doesn't do any such thing. If you choose to view the new site, it'll simply switch you to to the new site. If you follow a link to the new site, it will take you to the new site. If you follow a link to the current/old site, it will take you there. There's no "auto-redirect". And why should anyone switch early? Any links they share will be broken once everything is switched and rd subdomain ceases to exist anyway, and they'd have to switch their bookmarks to the rd subdomain and then switch them back again once the new design goes replaces the old site. There are multiple reasons as to why people might not be switching to the new layout permanently, and the majority of them are both irrelevant, and in no way indicate that your distaste for the new site is some kind of majority consensus. Everyone knows the people who dislike something are always louder than both those who like it, and those who don't care. 'Tyranny of the majority' and all that...

In response to post #55305648. #55306153 is also a reply to the same post. Pretty much all links spread all over the internet lead back to the normal nexusmods domain. Of course the vast majority of people who visit the site will be using that one, and not the rd domain used to preview the new site.

In response to post #54705413. #54706873 is also a reply to the same post. In addition to what Ethreon said, news articles are 'announced' via the "Updates" button in the site menu. So even if you don't wish to scroll down to check for news, chances are it'll inform you that there's something new right at the top of the page anyway.

In response to post #54671943. #54672703, #54677478, #54678053, #54681883, #54683388, #54683578, #54686488, #54686998, #54687253, #54687418, #54687503, #54688283, #54689173, #54691103, #54691838 are all replies on the same post. @pacfish It looks the same on a 16k display because the site's content has a maximum width of 1280 pixels. A little wider than I usually use for my sites (I generally follow the 960 grid system), but not exactly uncommon. It doesn't scale to match ridiculous resolutions or aspect ratios, though the background image does. Because of the responsive nature of the site, you COULD choose to view it snapped to half the width of your screen or otherwise restrict the width of your browser window yourself if the width of the content bothers you too much. Not saying that it's ideal, but it is a way to nullify the issue on your end. I do accept the issue with ultra-wide text displays being less readable than properly wrapped paragraphs. There is plenty of documentation supporting this fact. And of course people can post their opinions and concerns. That's the entire point of this being open to everyone in the final weeks of development. That being said, I try to correct incorrect information when I see it, and I try to explain why things may not be as easy or as logical as others seem to think them to be. Sometimes, decisions have to be made. It's not always as simple as just leaving both options on the table forever just to appeal to everyone's nostalgia. There's a lot of valid criticism of this new design, as well as a lot of emotion thinly veiled as criticism. Explaining why the latter isn't feasible is perfectly valid, no matter how much certain individuals may want to completely ignore those explanations.

In response to post #54677498. #54680143, #54686903, #54687293, #54688648, #54688928, #54689253, #54689373, #54689458, #54689713, #54689868, #54689943, #54690023 are all replies on the same post. Alright, I'm going to reiterate Eli's point using different words, because I don't think you understood it. She wasn't telling you not to use images in your description. She was telling you that you shouldn't use text that is in the form of images in your description. There's a huge difference, and the reasons for this difference are important. The first being the inability for search engines to parse text that is in the form of images. Another being the inability of translators to translate text in the form of images. Another is the inability of screen-readers to be able to read text that is in the form of images. I'm having a really hard time understanding why text in the form of text and text in the form of images are somehow more or less readable for someone who has autism, as you claimed. The issue is not the layout or the use of actual images. The issue is the use of images as a way of displaying text. Believe it or not, everyone here is actually trying to help you.