Fleetstdemon

Awesome, thx for the tips on sharing pics. I took a screenshot but was trying to upload it from the PS4. I was thinking 'surely theres a way to do this' but nope. I can't wait to build my new rig lol. I have a laptop or tablet i can use somewhere around. I'm redecorating atm so it'll be a mission to find them lol. I take i can't export the load order? Need to type it out? EDIT: Not sure if it happens elsewhere, i've just started a new game.

As the title states, i'm having an issue with Skyrim SE on PS4. Having just started a new game i was walking from Riverwood to Whiterun. Once i got to the part of the path where Whiterun is revealed i was greeted with a troubling sight. Whiterun was, well, white. Whiterun, along with the terrain at the farthest distance, was nothing but a white silhouette. Everything was fine from close to middle distance, then fog started to take over from there and the textures got steadily worse from there to the horizon. Having installed one or two or 88 mods, i looked for ones i had that affected fog/weather. I had two, one giving better volumetric fog effects and a version of supreme storms. I tried disabling the fog mod 1st but it changed nothing. I then tried disabling the supreme storms mod, which i discovered had a volumetric fog .esp also, but still no change. I'm not that far in, just completed bleak falls barrow, but i'm desperately trying to avoid a restart. I've literally played around 2,000 hours (since release) on PS3, (which as anyone who was around then knows, was an... experience...) along with many thousands of hours on PC. Can you imagine how many times i've had to play through helgen!? With my PC being broken i'm forced to play on PS4 where theres no Alternate Start by Arthmoor :( I remember having this issue before. I'm hoping its not a vanilla issue i solved with mods while playing on PC. I just don't remember vanilla lod looking like that.

@Jim_UK I sincerely hope that your statement that people have no rights here was some sort of ill conceived attempt at humor. I also think there is a distinction between a privately owned vs a private site. This site is privately owned but it is freely open to the general public. In fact it is not only freely open to the public, but the public are actively encouraged to enjoy and participate in the site and community. When you open your site to the general public you are at the mercy of the public. People on the site will find themselves interacting with people whom they may dislike for any number of reasons. Such situations can and will cause conflict which will manifest in any number of ways. Some people will be civil to those they dislike while others will insult and rage. Others will use ill conceived administrative tools to ban users they dislike for reasons the banning tool was not meant for. The point is that the mod author banning tool can, therefore will, be used inappropriately. Without some form of oversight and appeal process the people who do abuse the banning system will never be found out and punished. Those who are banned unjustly will lose access to areas of the site they enjoy for no good reason. People on this site have the same rights as they do at any other time. This site being privately owned in no way exempts it from human rights laws nor civil liberty laws. Example: A mod author bans someone after they find out a mod user's sexual orientation. That said mod user has the right not to be discriminated against on the basis of sexuality on this site just as they do anywhere else. The fact that there will be no oversight on mod author bans means no recourse for the mod user and also opens up the nexus owners to prosecution for enabling discrimination on their site by failing to provide adequate oversight of their members behavior. The nexus is responsible for its users conduct, as they are only too happy to remind us in copyright infringement matters. To be clear, I am not against more tools and protection for mod authors. I am however against this implementation as it gives mod authors protection at the expense of protection for mod users, can be used as a weapon against other users against which they will have no defense and is therefore broken at its core.

In response to post #10331716. #10352651 is also a reply to the same post. Note: I am not endeavouring to offend, merely to express opinions and worries. Can you please explain what is wrong with downloading a mod, finding you don't like the implementaion/features/look/bugs, going to the authors page and expressing this and suggesting to others on the page that they may prefer a similar mod by someone else? I was under the, perhaps foolish, impression that the comments section on the file pages are there to express thoughts and opinions regarding the mod. Also not downloading the mod is not the only "right" a user has. They also have the, as you put it, right to express there thoughts, feelings, opinions, ideas, requests etc on the mod, the authors vision for the mod, the authors technical expertise, the authors image, comments, along with anything and everything to do with the mod and its author. Why? Because by creating and uploading the mod for public consumption the author gives the users these "rights". By requesting that people download their mods and by maintaining a public profile with options for public feedback, the author/s are also inviting people to comment and critique them and their mod. Not everyone is the same. Not everyone will voice an opinion in a format, tone or containing content that the author finds pleasing. That however is just tough. As long as the author is not being threatened or suffering abuse, people should be able to say whatever they want about any mod or its author, authors conduct, or any information the author has made public as the author made a concious choice to make said mod/info public and everyone has the right to express their opinion. Expressing dislike or criticisms regarding a mod or its author or suggesting that people may prefer/enjoy an alternative in no way constitutes threats or abusive behavior and certainly should not be discouraged or looked down upon. I am extremely grateful that people share the changes they've made to the game and i am aware that some of the mods can take considerable time to develop, however there seems to be a huge bias in favor of the "rights" of the authors vs the "rights" of the users on this site. Banning a user is the ultimate sanction this site has in terms of punishment. Such a strong sanction should absolutely not be in the hands of mod authors and should not even be in the hands of moderators without the opportunity to appeal to a neutral party who would be better placed to retain objectivity, or without at least some form of oversight. A high moderator workload is no excuse to devolve the power to exclude to mod authors especially in such a fashion open to abuse. I sincerely appreciate the work the moderators do, especially as volunteers, however no amount of workload can justify this decision. It would in no way be difficult to enlist the services of more honest, objective, community orientated volunteer moderators from a community of this size to ease the workload on current moderators while still preseving the buffer of objectivity, integrity and credibility that a well run community with moderators enjoys. I feel as the nexus site/s grow, there is a growing disregard for the rights, feelings and happiness of the standard users of this site, without whom there would be no community as, along with mod authors, they are the lifeblood of this site both as a business enterprise and a community, responsobility for which rests solely with the person/s who recieve an income from the site and who are responsible for site policy. Despite not being directly active in the community, i have used the nexus for a long time and have consistently recommended and defended it to countless people. The feeling i am begining to get is one i have found on other sites as they have grown. It seems to be that, and i really hope i am mistaken, individual users or even users as a whole don't really matter anymore as there's plenty more fish in the sea. That, however, also holds true from a users perspective with regards to which site they will use and community they participate in.