I think you're going to be ok, lol. I'll skip the whole discussion on the hardware. I've been a computer tech for many, many years (Windows didn't even exist when I started) and one thing I've learned is that cars and computers have one thing in common: everyone has an opinion about what's best. I totally get the anxiousness, the gamer's PTSD, and the desperation that Starfield does well... you're preaching to the choir. I got burned on NMS (and a few others) as well... I think it's "ok", but I still get irrate thinking about the $60 I burned on that game when it was first released. I've got a few thousand hours in Fallout and Skyrim myself, so I can relate to the investment in time. People like you and I, we grew up watching original showings of Star Trek, Space 1999, Star Wars, we watched Skylab get built, and we watched the first space shuttle land. We wanted all of that in our games, but all we had was Pong, Defender, and Pac-Man. In a way, folks like us have waited for a game like Starfield for longer than most of these other players have even been alive. But like I said already, I think you're going to be ok. The technology has finally caught up with us; now we can play the kind of games we've dreamt about literally our entire lives. I think it's safe to expect that Starfield will do well. First, it's a Bethesda RPG game. Even with all the bugs, mis-steps, etc, they've had in the past, I don't think Bethesda has ever actually made a 'bad' RPG. Second, they made us wait an extra 9 months just to improve the quality of the game before it was released. The game was prety much done when Microsoft walked into the picture, but they added another 9 months to cook the game and make sure it comes out right. Third, and most important, there's the mod community. All you have to do is look at Fallout or Skyrim to see that this Bethesda modding community will not accept a bad game. If something doesn't work or seems to be missing 'something', the players will fix it.... and then they'll improve it.