NOMOREKINGSINAMERICA

I don't own this game, not yet at least. But I heard a bit ago that official mod tools have been released. So I was wondering if this game has any quest mods. That would certainly incentivize me to buy it. Quest mods add massively to replayability. They are one of the reasons why I've kept playing New Vegas since the original midnight release all these years, and one of the reasons I'm starting another playthrough of it tonight. So how are things on the quest mod front? And/or the prospects for such to be coming in the future

Have you reported the mods?

Considering that repackaging mods into a Bain format so that I can install them with Wrye Bash/Mash/Flash is only a minor inconvenience I don't see how it would be worth the effort. That said if anyone out there actually wants to go to the effort to do this I won't protest it so long as you don't touch my own mods current or future, though I have a hard time imagining anyone wanting to do all that work given how many mods people have made. Though I'm uneasy about it being done without the permission of the author if they don't reply and to be honest because of that I'm kind of hoping your idea doesn't end up going forward because I don't want the drama, nothing personal. But like I said if it does happen I won't protest it unless you touch my mods or any future mods of mine, I won't give permission don't bother asking.

Right now I have an RX 480 and it plays fine, but I was considering getting an nvidia graphics card and I wanted to know if the problems I heard people were having with nvidia drivers ever got solved without having to role back to old drivers.

I see. Well thanks for the replies.

I'm trying to understand all of the permutations of what can and cannot be specified in Terms of Use. What limits there are, if any, and where. What I can and cannot legally do. And I have my own youtube channel besides, though unmonetized. So I could end up in a very similar situation.

First, thank you for the reply. Next, to what degree of writing about a mod is permission required? For a full review you already say yes. What if I just type a name of a mod, for example in a thread about one's favorite mods and I list some? Do I need permission just to type the name of a mod, for example Jayred Ice-Veins' The Power Of Dragonbone , if that wasn't my own mod would I need permission just to type out the name of it like that in a public forum like this? If not, then to what degree can I talk about a mod before permission is required? If I can type out the name of a mod without permission in the before mentioned hypothetical favorite mod thread I used as an example, then am I allowed to say why I like the mods in question without permission? Even if I only type a few sentences? What about the images section here on Nexus, am I allowed to post in game images in which I had been using mods without the permission of the makers of all of the mods I had been using? Because I've been using our images section here on Nexus for years without once asking for permission of mod makers, I've posted images on various forums as well. I don't even recall what all the mods I was using for some of them were, so getting permission now would be impractical for many of them. Am I in danger of being sued? Should I pull them all down now to preempt any such danger? I've had various versions of your unofficial patches installed when I took all of my Skyrim images, including the ones showcasing my own mods. It never occurred to me before to check for your permission. Do you want me to take them down?

My thoughts exactly. I define whether or not my own mods are successful by whether or not I like them myself. If I like it then it is a success, if I think to myself "ugh, that went all wrong" when I look at it then it wasn't a success. I make mods for myself first and foremost, I enjoy feedback and seeing others use them yes, but that is only a bonus, my prime motivation is my own enjoyment with using them. Though if I was looking seriously at trying to break into the software industry using these mods to promote myself and get my name out there as I know some have been or are then I admit I probably wouldn't have such a laid back attitude. But I'm not, my degree is in video production not software programming, so laid back it is for me.

No, I wouldn't. Why? Arthmoor, since you seem to know more about this than I, I'd like to ask you some questions. If I understand you correctly then your position is that prior to publishing a review of a product the publisher of said review must first obtain the permission of the manufacturer of the before mentioned product, yes? Apologies if I've misunderstood, this is not a subject which I know much about. For clarification of your viewpoint I'd like your opinion on a few examples. In Series 12 episode 2 of BBC's Top Gear, Chrysler refused to lend them a Dodge Challenger to review, apparently because, as Richard Hammond put it "We're always horrid about their cars". So Richard Hammond purchased a Challenger and proceeded to review it anyway against the wishes of Chrysler. In your view, was Top Gear in the wrong to do this? Another example, The youtube channel Tech Deals has done an extensive review of this PC, the same model PC I own actually. He did not obtain the permission of CyberPowerPC, or the makers of any of the components, such as Intel, prior to releasing the review. He simply purchased it off of Amazon and then did a review of it. Should he have obtained the permission of CyberPowerPC prior to publishing the review? Should he have obtained the permission of the makers of the components used to assemble it, such as Intel, or Cooler Master? One last example, this time more specific to this situation. L0st-D4md has reviewed here on Reddit, Nehrim. If he didn't obtain permission from SureAI, I don't know if he did or not, but if he didn't then your view is that he should delete the review, yes? Apologies if these are stupid questions I'm making but as I said this isn't a subject I know anything about. I'm not sure what I can and can't do. Can I talk about a mod at all if I don't have specific permission to do so? Could I potentially be banned if I wrote a review of a mod here on the forums like L0st-D4md did on Reddit? I just don't know.

Why not view by "Last updated"? Or am I misunderstanding you?

When I import a video from youtube and put in the web address of a mod to try and tag it it just says nothing selected. What am I doing wrong?