This is a little off subject but... How about adding a moderator evaluation grace period on negative endorsements to make sure that negatives are warranted and not baseless...the old system required a justification on negative and positive endorsements...now people can say whatever they want about a mod true or false and the authors must simply live with it... ...let's face it, most people don't endorse, and those who give thumbs up are typically genuine...but I've seen a lot of negative endorsements that seem to show that people either aren't reading descriptions and are posting negative endorsements pertaining to items addressed in said descriptions or they are just simply trolling... ...I feel that the below types of endorsement should especially be reviewed, and the person endorsing should be required to justify their thumbs down... "the file caused conflicts with the game or other popular files" ...as I was informed by a moderator just recently that all mods are conflicts with the original game, this shouldn't be worded this way...and who is to say that the file it conflicts with is popular or not? "after playing the file it doesn't fit in to my personal tastes or beliefs, etc." This is somewhat silly since most files (definitely not all) adequately describe what a mod is about or what it contains...people should be able to discern if the file is going to offend them by these descriptions and at the very least the images section...if it doesn't adequately describe what the mod does I move on and don't download it so then this is a non-issue...I realize that not everyone has this sort of self control, but the authors shouldn't be the ones penalized for the ignorance or impatience of others, as they spend their free time working on mods for which they receive nothing aside from the feedback users provide...I can't and won't even try to speak for everyone, but I would at least like to know that the feedback I am receiving is actually constructive, and not simply a subjective pre-written statement that may not actually reflect the user's experience so much as their expectations...