Thor. Posted August 22, 2013 Author Share Posted August 22, 2013 Lol i never believed in the the whole end of the world nonsense like that. hmm just how credible is this Documentary, seems like a hoax just like the rest of them :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beriallord Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 (edited) ROTFL - Puma Punku was built by aliens! Have any of you been to the site and actually seen what is there? If the place was built by aliens - they must have been flying in spaceships made of wood and run by coal. When you want to show "evidence" of aliens, you make a video and take pictures that only show what supports your theory. You ignore (actually hide on purpose) the massive amount of evidence that exists that disproves the alien theory and never show it. You take information that is wrong and that has been shown to be wrong and present it as "fact". If you want to believe, you never look at anything other than youtube videos that identify "ITS ALIENS!!!!!" and then believe everything that's said in the video as absolute, fully accepted and irrefutable fact. The only thing that's being proven here is that there are people who so desperately want to believe that there are aliens they will do anything and believe anything no matter how dishonest or ridiculous it is. Yet I'm not seeing any more than rambling from you and none of this evidence to the contrary. The people they claim built that site had NO WRITTEN LANGUAGE. Someone cannot enginner something on that level without a written language. There isn't another example anywhere in the world of a culture building a structure on a similar level with no written language. Edited August 23, 2013 by Beriallord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted August 23, 2013 Author Share Posted August 23, 2013 (edited) There was a bowl found with writings from two different cultures, Milesss away from the actual Puma Punku http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-QdG5KEuOmvI/T4HNQF8gFpI/AAAAAAAAB7g/p-BJ9FT7fo0/s1600/ancient.aliens.s04e06.hdtv.x264-diverge%5B%28028514%2921-28-45%5D.JPGin a different country, that had resemblance to the writing found on structures. They also claim that the structures where made of Volcanic rock, but where are the volcanoes???Lets try to debunk the debunked, cause there claim has the same amount of inconsistencies as the other theory. they seemed to not have looked around there own surrounding to see the true picture. Edited August 23, 2013 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpheliaNeoma Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 ROTFL - Puma Punku was built by aliens! Have any of you been to the site and actually seen what is there? If the place was built by aliens - they must have been flying in spaceships made of wood and run by coal. When you want to show "evidence" of aliens, you make a video and take pictures that only show what supports your theory. You ignore (actually hide on purpose) the massive amount of evidence that exists that disproves the alien theory and never show it. You take information that is wrong and that has been shown to be wrong and present it as "fact". If you want to believe, you never look at anything other than youtube videos that identify "ITS ALIENS!!!!!" and then believe everything that's said in the video as absolute, fully accepted and irrefutable fact. The only thing that's being proven here is that there are people who so desperately want to believe that there are aliens they will do anything and believe anything no matter how dishonest or ridiculous it is. Yet I'm not seeing any more than rambling from you and none of this evidence to the contrary. The people they claim built that site had NO WRITTEN LANGUAGE. Someone cannot enginner something on that level without a written language. There isn't another example anywhere in the world of a culture building a structure on a similar level with no written language. You can be knowledgeable about mathematics and measurements without knowing how to write words. You can also communicate without knowing how to write. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted August 23, 2013 Author Share Posted August 23, 2013 I found a interesting documentary, but not so a documentary on that OFU found on the bottom of the Baltic sea. It ain't a hoax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidus44 Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 ROTFL - Puma Punku was built by aliens! Have any of you been to the site and actually seen what is there? If the place was built by aliens - they must have been flying in spaceships made of wood and run by coal. When you want to show "evidence" of aliens, you make a video and take pictures that only show what supports your theory. You ignore (actually hide on purpose) the massive amount of evidence that exists that disproves the alien theory and never show it. You take information that is wrong and that has been shown to be wrong and present it as "fact". If you want to believe, you never look at anything other than youtube videos that identify "ITS ALIENS!!!!!" and then believe everything that's said in the video as absolute, fully accepted and irrefutable fact. The only thing that's being proven here is that there are people who so desperately want to believe that there are aliens they will do anything and believe anything no matter how dishonest or ridiculous it is. Yet I'm not seeing any more than rambling from you and none of this evidence to the contrary. The people they claim built that site had NO WRITTEN LANGUAGE. Someone cannot enginner something on that level without a written language. There isn't another example anywhere in the world of a culture building a structure on a similar level with no written language. I sort of wonder how much benefit there would be to providing any evidence of anything in a discussion about something that doesn't exist and to an individual who is fully convinced that what they know and understand about something is factually accurate and thus the truth. I would ask, however, how much time did you spend working there to come up with the irrefutable evidence you have posted in the form of a youtube video? Me? I only spent 8 weeks on the site in the 1990's after the earthquake and worked with real archeologists, spoke with people in the area and saw how the work at the site was done. You see, it's sort of one of my faults that I tend to believe real, physical evidence that I have seen with my own eyes and the opinion of experts rather than a youtube video made by some ufologist with a degree from Coconut College at Lobotomy University whose agenda is to "prove" aliens exist, rather than finding the truth. I'm just funny that way. However, please, feel free to believe whatever it is you want and please, definitely keep posting all the "evidence" you can find from highly respected archeological resources like "youtube" and "Aliens Are Us" or whatever. Maybe you'll be able to convince some of us "ramblers" that you actually know the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted August 23, 2013 Author Share Posted August 23, 2013 (edited) A real archeologist here What are the odds of that happening, not to mention the same topic. Okay now we have someone with actual knowledge of the archeological site, maybe we can shed some light on the subject. Maybe we can come down with the clues to the true nature of the mystery. okay smiley faces removed. Edited August 23, 2013 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisnpuppy Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 OMG real archeologist here :D What are the odds of that happening, not to mention the same topic :teehee:. Okay now we have someone with actual knowledge of the archeological site, maybe we can shed some light on the subject. :teehee: Maybe we can come down with the clues to the true nature of the mystery.Thor, hun....I think you might want to take some deep breaths. You have no reason to doubt what he tells you and if you want to disagree with or question or debate any evidence he brings to the table then do so...but don't make insinuations regarding the honestly of his personal claim that no amount of smiley faces will hide. If you want to joke around and make tongue-in-cheek comments then perhaps you should not call foul on a personal claim. I am sure you didn't mean for it to come across that way but it has. Thank you.~Lisnpuppy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted August 23, 2013 Author Share Posted August 23, 2013 (edited) Okay, though smileys don't represent actual emotion, just ones eternal thoughts of the event at hand so caps lock is not used. more USO stuff, can't deny sonar images. come on have some fun, so whose going to explain this sonar image, it does look like a crash site. Edited August 23, 2013 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rennn Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 The universe is huge. Like, hundreds of billions of galaxies, each containing hundreds of billions of stars. So, it's highly likely that the kind of life we're used to exists. But we're also pretty narrow in what we consider 'life.' We tend to think Carbon-based cells, but seeing as carbon is a (relatively) uncommon atom in the universe as a whole, and under different circumstances, cells might not be the base-unit of life on another planet. So it's even more likely that life exists in other forms. We will probably never make contact, and we will probably never be officially aware of the existence of Aliens, but it's actually more far-fetched to think that we're alone in the vast cosmos.To clarify my statement. I'm not saying that life doesn't exist out there. What I am however saying is that it is unlikely that any group of aliens have been working with world governments for the purposes of furthering any agenda. I might even go so far as to state that it is unlikely that any reports within the last 50 years have had anything to do with alien (or extra-dimensional) visitation. Not that it couldn't be the case, but rather that if it was the case that even 1% were genuine in this regard, then the Earth would have to be so frequently visited that it would be impossible to prevent some sort of contamination that would be impossible to ignore. Agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now