Simniac Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Hi. :) What is better, dual wielding weapons or a weapon and a shield? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZoMHead Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Everyone has their own version of "better". For absolute max damage, dual wielding can and will get very very OP. Personally, i never likes dual wielding at all, in any game. I just adore weapon + shield (especially a mace + shield with heavy armour, making a nice crusader build). Eventually, with fortify one handed potions and enchanted gear, you will 1-2 hit kill everything on legendary difficulty. So, it is up to you to "how far" you want you'r dual wielding to go. Game becomes very boring very quickly..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FishBiter Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I would say weapon and shield is better. Gives you more versatility with being able to attack, block, and shield bash. Dual wielding lets you attack, attack, or attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riverbanks Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Neither is better, it just depends on who your character is. A thief/assassin would want smaller, lighter weapons that are easy to conceal or throw away in a hurry, and probably wouldn't go sneaking around lugging a heavy clunky shield on their back. A knight or soldier with formal combat instruction might prefer the sword/mace and shield style of fight, blocking, circling and waiting for an opening - or they might be more agressive and parry with two swords/a sword and a dagger. A barbarian with a simplistic "kill all the things" mind might prefer to just hack and slash at everything with two war axes (if a big two-handed battleaxe is too unwieldy). Use what feels right for your character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kleinstaff Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 like someone else mentioned it all depends on the sort of charater you are playing one thing i learned is that a dual wielding character versus ;ultiple magicusers or archers usual goes down faster than a character using a dhield and wearing heavy armour but if you want maximum carnage yep dual wielding is the better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maverick827 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I find dual wielding in Skyrim to be incredibly clumsy. I prefer sword and shield. But I've also turned my game into a party-based RPG and carry 3 - 4 followers around with me, so with damage not being an issue I only really gain by going sword and shield anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheshiredragon Posted September 5, 2013 Share Posted September 5, 2013 I have tried both. This time around I decided to do dual wielding. As Maverick states, it's rather clumsy and I do find myself taking on more damage. I moved back to shield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eLucifer Posted September 5, 2013 Share Posted September 5, 2013 You can block while dual wielding by the way: http://skyrim.nexusmods.com/mods/9247/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simniac Posted September 5, 2013 Author Share Posted September 5, 2013 Neither is better, it just depends on who your character is. A thief/assassin would want smaller, lighter weapons that are easy to conceal or throw away in a hurry, and probably wouldn't go sneaking around lugging a heavy clunky shield on their back. A knight or soldier with formal combat instruction might prefer the sword/mace and shield style of fight, blocking, circling and waiting for an opening - or they might be more agressive and parry with two swords/a sword and a dagger. A barbarian with a simplistic "kill all the things" mind might prefer to just hack and slash at everything with two war axes (if a big two-handed battleaxe is too unwieldy). Use what feels right for your character.Im sorry if this is a n00b question, but how do you do circling? Is that when you circle around left/back/right or right/back/left to avoid getting hit in combat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorrionfinley Posted September 5, 2013 Share Posted September 5, 2013 Neither is better, it just depends on who your character is. A thief/assassin would want smaller, lighter weapons that are easy to conceal or throw away in a hurry, and probably wouldn't go sneaking around lugging a heavy clunky shield on their back. A knight or soldier with formal combat instruction might prefer the sword/mace and shield style of fight, blocking, circling and waiting for an opening - or they might be more agressive and parry with two swords/a sword and a dagger. A barbarian with a simplistic "kill all the things" mind might prefer to just hack and slash at everything with two war axes (if a big two-handed battleaxe is too unwieldy). Use what feels right for your character.Im sorry if this is a n00b question, but how do you do circling? Is that when you circle around left/back/right or right/back/left to avoid getting hit in combat? No it's where you block and go in circles around the enemy, like circle his body, like act like your creating a circle around that person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts