Jump to content

Slavery: The Forcible Inclusionary Policy


hanserya

Recommended Posts

Does taking a stand for inclusivity include being tolerant of people that fantasize about being slave owners? It would seem that slavery is the very antithesis of inclusivity in that slaves are effectively excluded from the human experience in totality, but then again I guess there is the potential that it would simply be seen as inclusion under duress depending on ones perspective.

 

Or, are there really so many of them that we can't afford to deliberately exclude those individuals from participation? If that's the case, then do people really just mean that they stand for inclusion up to the point that holding others accountable for exclusionary behavior will impact them negatively in some personal manner?

 

What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does taking a stand for inclusivity include being tolerant of people that fantasize about being slave owners? It would seem that slavery is the very antithesis of inclusivity in that slaves are effectively excluded from the human experience in totality, but then again I guess there is the potential that it would simply be seen as inclusion under duress depending on ones perspective.

 

Or, are there really so many of them that we can't afford to deliberately exclude those individuals from participation? If that's the case, then do people really just mean that they stand for inclusion up to the point that holding others accountable for exclusionary behavior will impact them negatively in some personal manner?

 

What do you think?

I think this post about to get deleted lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest deleted34304850

Does taking a stand for inclusivity include being tolerant of people that fantasize about being slave owners? It would seem that slavery is the very antithesis of inclusivity in that slaves are effectively excluded from the human experience in totality, but then again I guess there is the potential that it would simply be seen as inclusion under duress depending on ones perspective.

 

Or, are there really so many of them that we can't afford to deliberately exclude those individuals from participation? If that's the case, then do people really just mean that they stand for inclusion up to the point that holding others accountable for exclusionary behavior will impact them negatively in some personal manner?

 

What do you think?

i think you're an idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...