Lisnpuppy Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Physique has nothing to really do with it. I've seen women take down a 6'4'' 250 pound man down like they were a ragdoll. There are women who are martial artist experts. They have proven themselves more than capable. This is part of the social stigmas that is making it seem like women are incapable of dealing or being female is a disorder, when loads of them have proven otherwise. I can't do half the stuff that the women do at their jobs where I live, but they're still women. Being a woman doesn't make them less of a hard worker than a man. If they can do it, what's the problem? Haha, thanks for making me laugh. Sure. You've seen a 250lb man ragdolled by a girl... Did you see this in a cartoon? The only way a women could possibly compete with a man is if she were seriously juiced up, but then she would have the hormonal profile of man. Women are useless at hard physical labor. Modern people are so removed from the harsh physical reality of nature that they have no conception of how real gender differences are in these settings. We have deluded ourselves into thinking that egalitarian ideology can surpass nature. Though I have always said that there are differences in the sexes (which is fine) to say "women are useless at hard physical labor".....wow. Maybe the strongest man is always going to be physically stronger than the strongest woman...that doesn't mean that one is useless while the other is not. Well I'm afraid that gets this one closed. Majcrazam...That is extremely offensive and I would urge you to be far more politic in the future....debates thread or not.~Lisnpuppy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts