TheCalliton Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 figure out who would win a guy who is 8 feet tall or a guy who is 4 foot 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harabec Weathers Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 I voted dwarf. Primarily because Im 5'9 and Ive never gotten into a fight that I did not with. Speed and coordination are greater assests than being large :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monolithic0117 Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 Wait... this doesn't have anything to do with the post I made in the "great equalizer" thread, does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagrant0 Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 Depends entirely on the situation, and what one defines as "winning". Being tall has its share of disadvantages as well as advantages. Being short, also has its share of advantages or disadvantages. This is also kinda in the wrong section since there is nothing objective to discuss, and most everything subjective is presented without some sort of guidelines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AncientSpaceAeon Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 This is also kinda in the wrong section since there is nothing objective to discuss, and most everything subjective is presented without some sort of guidelines.I knew my polls are better ! :P :P ;D (just kidding) I chose dwarf anyway, they're too short for a giant to see, and absolutely are smart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMeister Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 Either. It's not the size of the man in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamerbird Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 Depends what weapons are readily avaliable and who the dwarf is.I mean the giant has no chance is the dwarf happens to have a ak47 with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josh900 Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 For starters the guy who's 8 feet tall more than likely suffers from pituitary gigantism. And that comes with all sorts of medical problems involving their circulatory or skeletal system causing them to be far weaker than the average person. The person who's 4 foot 9 is probably just short. And if he is a dwarf their known for being very stout people so he'd be able to take a beating far better than what the giant could handle. And with that in mind. The short person would would win in a fight very easily Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harabec Weathers Posted September 17, 2009 Share Posted September 17, 2009 Lol so why was the first topic reported lol? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCalliton Posted September 17, 2009 Author Share Posted September 17, 2009 Depends entirely on the situation, and what one defines as "winning". Being tall has its share of disadvantages as well as advantages. Being short, also has its share of advantages or disadvantages. This is also kinda in the wrong section since there is nothing objective to discuss, and most everything subjective is presented without some sort of guidelines.the point is to see what people come up with. i am basically studying how people will run with this Lol so why was the first topic reported lol?i really wish i knew... probably the lack of rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts