MonsterHunterMaster Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Call of duty 5... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaosals42 Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Call of Duty 4. I like WAW way better. I played that game briefly and really disliked it myself. The MW games are completely overrated IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaLkAwaY Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 Call of Duty 4. I like WAW way better. I played that game briefly and really disliked it myself. The MW games are completely overrated IMO. They are overrated in the sense of what you get in gaming with others. If you game with Friends they can be fun. Gaming with randoms the way IW and Acti. are making it then yes it truly sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killzone12 Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 xblades Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alithinos Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 I'll tell you all of the worst and not THE worst.They are so bad,I can't decide which is worse. 1.At N64 Carmaggedon 64 Bad controls,worse physics,bad graphics,only 6 levels,too hard,no story...Amazed even that someone actually published this thing. 2.At Gamecube Turok Evolution. After an innovative diamond <Turok 2> they made a bad sequel <Turok 3>,and then the ultimate letdown for the fans,which was Turok: Evolution.Came at a 128 bit console with worse graphics,gameplay and level design than it's prequel which came out on a 64 bit console. 3.At xbox 360 Perfect Dark Zero Perfect Dark on N64 was one of the most innovative games of it's era,and the reason Microsoft bought Rareware studio for 65.000.000 british pounds.After the sellout a large part of the development team felt betrayed and left the company,which had to hire new people.But completely different people made a completely different game,so only the name was the same.Perfect Dark Zero was shorter,with no unblockables at all,<while the original was full of it,giving it unique replay value>,less multiplayer levels <only 6 from 30+>,a completely different story that had nothing to do with the original's,less features,less game modes,less interactivity,and a different gameplay made for noobs/casuals. 4. At PC. Wolfenstein Oh boy,that was a LETDOWN ! From fast paced action,having to keep running around enemies,and need for fast reflexes they changed it and they made it moving slow and having to use iron sights to look more like Call of Duty.They destroyed the game's characteristic.What people liked in it.The game also didn't responded at the franchise's quality standards,which are:Not a single bug,not a single glitch not a single crash from the beggining. They also removed explicit content that past Wolfenstein games were known for.It didn't had experiments on humans,tortures upon living humans,or skeletons.All these were too "mean" and "bad" for their little game...At Wolfenstein 3d you had to kill Hitler <which was a real person>At Return to Castle Wolfenstein you were facing Himmler <also was a real person>At the new Wolfenstein,they didn't put any real person in the game.They actually used Himmler's face but changed his name to "Deathsed" because they just couldn't let it be "mean".They also made the WORST MULTIPLAYER mode ever exists. Only 2 weeks after the game's release there were hardly 20 people playing it online all around the world.Today,4 months later not even a single person. Despite the gameplay change,and the casualisation of the series this game was like it was developed in a rush.Completely useless "Features" were there,only for someone to can say that they actually are there.Half finished. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VindicationX Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 Wow... Why all the hate towards PacMan? It's a huge part of video game history and a revered classic. How anyone can honestly include this game as the "Worst Game Ever" is beyond me. One must consider the time period of the title in question before labeling it as such... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilneko Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 In a way, I envy those who said "Pacman" -- they've quite obviously never played a truly bad game. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonsterHunterMaster Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 I like the "old" pacman even though i was never good at it..there are a lot of modern pac-man games that dont have the "old look" anymore... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andgkj Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 The worst game I played is Breakout... really very slow game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonsterHunterMaster Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 Mobile suit gundam for ps3... :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now