Debate on evolution

[standalone09]

 

@FiftyTifty Evolutionism is basically bashing itself with statements like "yeah you know if earth created itself the electromagnetic field around it did too" So to speak Electromagnetism alone is an enigma enough for every geology professor or scientist that claims to live on a 4.5bilion year old planet. So you have much more with ignorance in common then you think. :smile:

Erm, what ya tryin' ta say here? Electromagnetism is a property of metallic mass.... no mystery there.

 

 

 

The Point is that an Electromagnet cannot start up then turn off and start up again on its own without an socket at least :wink: , ridiculously enough modern evolutionists are just trying to say that^^ the electromagnetic field somehow reversed in its past it got weaker then it got stronger etc... how can a serious adult man say this.

 

If our earth would "only" be 10000 years old then 10k years ago our earth would be something called an "magnetic star" the Sun is a star so...

 

now if it would be 52000 years old the magnetic field would be huge like that from a Pulsar Star... you see this year numbers arent much in "evolution theory measurement" ^^

 

So its impossible that our earth is older then 10k years old.

Edited April 29, 2014 by standalone09

[FiftyTifty]

Electromagnetism has nothing to do with evolution.

 

You're thinking of...What, geology?

 

I couldn't follow the rest of your gibberish. You mentioned something about the Earth being a star?

 

Well, it just so happens that the center of the Earth, past the molten core, is actually a micro-star (not a scientific term :P). Not like it matters...I'm pretty sure you're misinformed by a great deal. You're trying to disprove evolution by disproving geology. Nevermind the fact that it makes no sense, you've yet to cite where you're getting these numbers from.

 

I doubt you're getting them from a peer-reviewed, scientific institute/journal/academy/whatever. Call it a hunch, if you will.

[standalone09]

Electromagnetism has nothing to do with evolution.

 

because you cant explain it? i will write now a bit slower and more clear because you seem to have problems understanding quite simple things. :)

Edited April 29, 2014 by standalone09

[FiftyTifty]

Uh. No. It's because evolution is an explanation of how organisms develop advantageous adaptions to their environment.

 

Electromagnetism is to deal with...Well, electromagnetism.

 

It's a complete non sequitur.

[standalone09]

Look the strength of the electromagnetic field gets lower it doesnt stay the same i know the evolution theory tells us about a Magic Magnetic field that somehow goes skyrocket in terms of strength but then all of a sudden it magically drops... that isnt possible.

Edited April 29, 2014 by standalone09

[HeyYou]

We have evidence that it has changed, and is constantly shifting.

 

If the planet cannot possibly be more than 10K years old, please explain to me why we find fossils that are millions of years old on a regular basis. Or, are you going to dispute carbon dating as well?

[standalone09]

You mean the coelacanth some african fishermen caught ALIVE 100 years ago? https://www.google.at/#q=coelacanth :smile:

Edited April 29, 2014 by standalone09

[TheVampireDante]

Standalone09: I suggest you take a better tone when replying to others, as your comments have verged into being insulting.

 

If you can't reply without resulting to mild insults then this discussion will not last much longer.

[kvnchrist]

Sorry, but I haven't heard one valid argument about anything to do with creationism.

 

I heard, first the idea that the world was made and ceased to evolve according to his idea that the mountains would have eroded into nothing if the world was older than a few 1000 years. This is an absurd suggestion noting that the surface was created by the movement of the tectonic plates and the unending impact of several plates will continue to create more mountainous regions far into the future. In fact the continents were created in such a manner and several million years into the future, I don't think that the world will look the same as does today.

 

As far as the Earth being cooler, I would look at the many cool snaps that the world has gone through in the past and warmed up again. I don't think that any of these occurrences can be fully explained or anybody use this as a chance to attach their own theoretical band-aid.

 

From what I understand, the Earths magnetic disposition is do to the materials that it is made from and much of that is still molten at the core and as such is moving. Why should the magnetic sphere not fluctuate over the course of the Earths own evolution? I fail to see any reason why anyone would come up with the suggestion that the intensity would increase, since the material that creates this field has not increased since the world was formed.

 

Maybe you could enlighten us with any links to studies that would support your ideas.

[standalone09]

We are debating about science so practically this has nothing to do with religion its my right to question EVERYTHING xD even the evolution theory.

 

Now i fail to see how an electromagnetic field can become stronger then weaker then stronger again thats evolutionism fantasy. :smile:

 

i mean if you can build me an electromagnetic field that gets stronger then weaker and then again stronger without any socket or something else i would believe you of course though the point is you cant.

 

BTW: ty to the mods for reopening :smile:

Edited April 30, 2014 by standalone09