MidbossVyers Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 (edited) General Decianus on this video. He also insists that mental torture is not a thing... OK, fine, when I checked to confirm, I found that the official term is "psychological torture", but if that's what he is correcting me about, then that would be very anal of him. Edited January 30, 2016 by MidbossVyers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rethrain Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 I tend to reel away from you tube. Idiots like him flock to it. There are worse though. Yeah, he's clearly an imbecile. To be absolutely honest, reading his pile of garbage comments is psychological torture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lachdonin Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Yeah, that just... ugh. I don't like Ulfric. I don't like what he stands for, i don't like his tactics, and i don't like his voice. But that doesn't mean i will ever resort to that sort of idiocy to try and convince people that the Empire is in the right. Â Sometimes i'm disheartened that my side of the argument seems to have the biggest idiots... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPatch Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Sometimes i'm disheartened that my side of the argument seems to have the biggest idiots...Not a distinction that most people compete for. Oh, wait. Idiots. Never mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pgir001 Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Yeah, that just... ugh. I don't like Ulfric. I don't like what he stands for, i don't like his tactics, and i don't like his voice. But that doesn't mean i will ever resort to that sort of idiocy to try and convince people that the Empire is in the right. Â Sometimes i'm disheartened that my side of the argument seems to have the biggest idiots...It's only my opinion. But the problem as I see it is that neither side is particularly good for Skyrim. Both sides offer a much longer CON list than a PRO list. To me, picking sides in the Civil War is like choosing how you want Skyrim to die. They both suck to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPH1 Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Which is why I have not started the Civil War in my latest plays. Prefer to keep the military camps around for their blacksmith merchants. The war has apparently been going on for years, perhaps decades, before my/our arrival. What is the hurry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lachdonin Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 The war has apparently been going on for years, perhaps decades, before my/our arrival. What is the hurry? Nah. A Year, tops. Torygg is killed, signaling the beginning of the Civil War, in the same year Alduin returns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPatch Posted February 2, 2016 Share Posted February 2, 2016 (edited) It's only my opinion. But the problem as I see it is that neither side is particularly good for Skyrim. Both sides offer a much longer CON list than a PRO list. To me, picking sides in the Civil War is like choosing how you want Skyrim to die. They both suck to me.In presentation, entertainers (TV, movies, theater, etc.) tend to go to three environment models:Idealistic View -- stereotypes are crisp and clear, most characterizations are shallow and narrow. Grim Reality View -- focuses on the seamier and seedy interpretations, even Heroes are depicted more like Anti-heroes.Synthesis View -- deliberately blending the two other views with Good Guys being Idealistic but Bad Guys being more Grim Reality versions. It makes a stark contrast between Good and Evil. HOWEVER, just experiencing the Real World we come to recognize that there are rarely (if ever) pure Good and Evil in the world. Life is just a series of picking the least Evil of many, many choices. EVERYBODY has at least some Good points to be weighed against their Bad points. It was either brilliant or exceedingly annoying how Bethesda has balanced soooo many situations in Skyrim. Everybody and everything has at least some Good as well as some Bad. We are left to choose between sides on nearly every issue on just how we, personally, weigh the values of those Good and Bad elements. Sometimes, all you want to do is identify the Big Bad and pummel him into the dirt without hesitation or remorse, because he has NO redeeming virtues. Or to be the Biggest Bad of all by stomping all over total innocents. That's when this everything-in-the-balance approach can be annoying. Edited February 2, 2016 by CaptainPatch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidbossVyers Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Morality is relative. If you rescue a child from a tribe that practices child sacrifice, you must think yourself a hero. However, everyone, including the child whom you rescued, will consider you their version of the Anti-Christ. Only certain Chuunis actually "want" to be the Big Bad. People tend to do things that bring them joy, which are good. People tend to avoid doing things that make them lament, which are evil. Indeed, the current main antagonist in Fate/grand order is King Solomon, who is classified as lawful good, and many chaotic evil heroes whom you recruit end up being not as bad as the stories say, once you get to know them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deleted24351144User Posted March 26, 2016 Share Posted March 26, 2016 I thing the Empire is far better than Stromcloaks.You know why?Because Ulfric just think how to rule,I mean !In a save after i completed Stormcloaks missions he and Galmar just thinking to create more army and army,but on the other side Tullius just think to quell this rebelion.I am fan of the Empire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts