SergeantGrrock Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 Hmmmm. Vanilla PC game is still a mess. Talking about DLC's. Whatever. I know. I need to get over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackCompany Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 I find it hard to care. I hate that Skyrim was built from the console down. Beth's attitude is "well, we'll release it using 1998 technology and let the fanboys polish it up'. Nice. How about: - Real multi-core support?- DX11- Uh FIX THE @%&^@*^ SHADOWS!- A UI that wasn't built for thumb-tards- True 64bit/LAA enabled and optimised code? Don't get me started. DLC or not, I refuse to further $upport Beth until they get a decade. Or three. Agreed. Vanilla Skyrim was a bad joke. No Role playing. No choices. No consequence. All of which is fine - if you advertise your new, open world action title. But they didn't. They blatantly promised an RPG, with choices and consequences and then made no attempt to deliver those things. At all. Technically their entire ad campaign for Skyrim was built on false advertising. Granted I am enjoying the game again. Thanks to mods. Same old story as their previous titles. A watered-down, consolized action game for kids with no attention span and no desire to work to achieve anything. Their idea of increasing challenge is to turn everything into a damage sponge. They throw gold and loot at you. Magic items abound, even at vendors. It was like Borderlands with swords and Dragons. Fortunately mods have fixed much of that. I have a loot overhaul I made, and combat and magic overhauls as well. Its very much to personal taste - hence the unreleased nature of much of it - but it fixes a lot of these things. However, I am done. Finished. If Obsidian develops the next Fallout on, say, Unreal 3 or Id handles it on IdTech5, I will consider buying it. But future games developer by Bethesda themselves are officially off my radar. There are devs out there who still care about PC, and Bethesda isn't one. I am sick of having to make a game playable for adult audiences before I can play, despite having paid for it in full. No more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
azaltan Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 (edited) WASTELAND 2 Edited April 18, 2012 by azaltan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NordicMist Posted April 18, 2012 Share Posted April 18, 2012 However, I am done. Finished. If Obsidian develops the next Fallout on, say, Unreal 3 or Id handles it on IdTech5, I will consider buying it. But future games developer by Bethesda themselves are officially off my radar. There are devs out there who still care about PC, and Bethesda isn't one. I am sick of having to make a game playable for adult audiences before I can play, despite having paid for it in full. No more. My thoughts exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elsarian Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 (edited) Sorry to break it to you, but your recollection is not correct. Here is a link straight to what Todd said. Todd was in an interview with AUS Gammers, and mentioned what I said about DLC being fewer in number, but large in size. The man said it himself in the interview. I can provide you a direct link to a youtube video of the interview. Edited April 19, 2012 by Elsarian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorwynKelm Posted April 19, 2012 Author Share Posted April 19, 2012 Sorry to break it to you...SNIP So what? Doesn't change the fact that Beth should be fixing what's already out, not milking dollars from people for content that would only create more bugs. Simple matter is, Beth shouldn't even be handing out flyers until the fix all the bugs that STILL exist in Skyrim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thefinn Posted April 19, 2012 Share Posted April 19, 2012 Does anyone else not see how this relates to skyrim at all ?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts