What Did Skyrim Do Right?

[Enatiomorph]

3>2, it is known, Khaleesi.

 

LOL

Edited October 31, 2012 by Enatiomorph

[modder3434]

3>2, it is known, Khaleesi.

 

LOL

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibfxC9O8Fmo

 

and to get this topis back on point....

 

I like the new combat system with the perks to decap and the kill moves

[Enatiomorph]

I like smithing, but like with most things Skyrim, it's one or two steps forwards and almost as many back - since there is no degradation.

[sajuukkhar9000]

 

Then you never had an argument, since you said that all pretty much all builds maxed out attributes regardless. You just proved yourself wrong. Math has already proven you wrong and nothing you say will ever change how math works. Attributes, skills and perks is mathematically more diversity than just skills and perks. 3 is more than 2, you are aware of that, correct?

You are aware that pretty much =/= all. You do understand the difference between most and all right?

 

 

And no, having three systems =/= more diversity then two systems if one or more of the 3 systems doesn't contribute to character diversity, and indeed, makes characters more similar. You are ignoring how the attribute system actually works and just saying there are three systems thus it is more complex.

 

1 + 1 + 1 is not greater then 1 + 1 if one or more of those three 1's are negatives.

 

your math is flawed

Edited October 31, 2012 by sajuukkhar9000

[MiloHunts]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfq5kju627c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qu-qgPjEcPI&feature=related

[Enatiomorph]

 

Then you never had an argument, since you said that all pretty much all builds maxed out attributes regardless. You just proved yourself wrong. Math has already proven you wrong and nothing you say will ever change how math works. Attributes, skills and perks is mathematically more diversity than just skills and perks. 3 is more than 2, you are aware of that, correct?

You are aware that pretty much =/= all.

 

And no having more systems does not make your character more diverse.

 

having three systems =/= more diversity then two systems if one or more of the 3 systems doesn't contribute to character diversity, and indeed, makes characters more similar.

 

You are ignoring how the attribute system actually works and just saying there are three systems thus it is more complex.

 

1 + 1 + 1 is not greater then 1 + 1 is two of those three 1's are negatives.

 

your math is falwed

Actually you are ignoring how it worked, since at first you tried to say it made them all the same, then admitted that it didnt. Get your argument straight and come back, since now anything you try to say is taken with a grain of salt. Math has already proven you wrong 3>2. Attributes, skills and perks>just skills and perks. Get over it.

 

If you were to take the attributes away from Fallout, let's say, would there be more or less diversity? Common sense gives the answer, and it is less.

Edited October 31, 2012 by Enatiomorph

[modder3434]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfq5kju627c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qu-qgPjEcPI&feature=related

 

 

i just fell out of my chair laughing! :laugh:

 

well played sir! :thumbsup:

[Enatiomorph]

At least I'm talking about the game, and not spamming. When it comes to diversity, the more option you have, the more diversity you have. 3 sets of options is more than 2 sets of options.

[sajuukkhar9000]

Actually you are ignoring how it worked, since at first you tried to say it made them all the same, then admitted that it didnt. Get your argument straight and come back, since now anything you try to say is taken with a grain of salt. Math has already proven you wrong 3>2. Attributes, skills and perks>just skills and perks. Get over it.

Ugh.... I swear.

 

When raising attributes like endurance the bonuses they provide are small for each individual level, having an 80 in endurance, and an 85 in endurance really doesn't mean jack squat but a point or two of health.

 

The difference between the two characters is so minimal it might as well not exist, when I said they were all exactly the same, I do admit, it was a slight embellishment, but then again, I thought you actually had some understand of how the system worked and would get my meaning, which you apparently don't.

[Enatiomorph]

Actually you are ignoring how it worked, since at first you tried to say it made them all the same, then admitted that it didnt. Get your argument straight and come back, since now anything you try to say is taken with a grain of salt. Math has already proven you wrong 3>2. Attributes, skills and perks>just skills and perks. Get over it.

Ugh.... I swear.

 

When raising attributes like endurance the bonuses they provide are small for each individual level, having an 80 in endurance, and an 85 in endurance really doesn't mean jack squat but a point or two of health.

 

The difference between the two characters is so minimal it might as well not exist, when I said they were all exactly the same, I do admit, it was a slight embellishment, but then again, I thought you actually had some understand of how the system worked and would get my meaning, which you apparently don't.

I dont even think you know what all attributes did. Nothing is ever going to change the mathematical fact that 3 sets of options in greater than 2 sets.