MikeDavis Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 (edited) This is one of the best modders he managed to well ahem "add new custom animations and monsters".He got rewarded for this job with ban couse it was ilegal... Just take a look: Edited February 25, 2013 by MikeDavis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghosu Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 (edited) Aren't that animations of an monster, that is already ingame? Troll or something (since all imported creatures do the same) - haven't played the game quite a while so my memory is fading. Replacing an exisiting creature is no big deal (especially if you don't have to model/texture it) - and of course you get banned, it's a simple rule not to rip content. EDIT: Though i guess you can export DA:O anmations as well (like the 3D mesh) and once you have it in 3DsMax you can import it to Skyrim...would be of interest if they are added as new animations, but i guess this is just a replacer. Edited February 25, 2013 by ghosu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeDavis Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 (edited) Look at that headbutt and the jump double fist attack it apears new to me. I Check the real dragon age orgins ogre in a movie and does the same animations. I havent played the game for a big while too so i can be wrong. Edited February 25, 2013 by MikeDavis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NemesisTheWarlock Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Shame he didn't come up with original content to go along with the obvious skill, what a pity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnaiSiaion Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 well, popularity has never been a good measure of anything since the dawn of time.Well, personally I've always found it to be an excellent measure of what the majority like :wink: Popularity tells you how many people 1/ know about the work and 2/ like it just enough to download/commend/upvote/award it. There are many awesome bands no one knows about. Does this mean they suck? Fewer people appreciate Vivaldi than Britney Spears even though they often buy expensive hardware to listen to it. Does this mean Britney Spears is better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NemesisTheWarlock Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 well, popularity has never been a good measure of anything since the dawn of time.Well, personally I've always found it to be an excellent measure of what the majority like :wink: Popularity tells you how many people 1/ know about the work and 2/ like it just enough to download/commend/upvote/award it. There are many awesome bands no one knows about. Does this mean they suck? Fewer people appreciate Vivaldi than Britney Spears even though they often buy expensive hardware to listen to it. Does this mean Britney Spears is better?Not my point at all, it was just meant to be a light hearted throw away comment. :)I was merely saying that popularity indicates what more people like currently, not whether it's any good or not. I can assure you that I have more Vivaldi than Britney Spears in my music collection, but I couldn't argue that Vivaldi is more popular than her, certainly not at the moment anyway, better is a simple matter of fact, but not more popular.For example, right now I'm listening to Devil Sold His Soul, one of the finest bands out there imho, but I expect that no one reading this has ever even heard of them :devil: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts