In theory, under your proposition - they both stay on the site. As I've asked before - how do you define the rules. Horse moved to offensive. Cat is not. Why not both? How do you explain that to the 2 authors. How do you explain to me the rules that moved my horse mod to an offensive click wall, and the exploding cats mod was not. Bear in mind, again hypothetically, but if someone were to be intent on endorsements and praise for a mod, how do you explain the rules that define why they are "targeted". I'm ASKING HOW, if there is no "considerable debate" about the cat mod - does it get moved to offensive? A fair standard is not being applied if you base it on "considerable debate" in this example. The squeaky wheel is getting the grease. Making an offensive catagory just means essentially every mod up'd to this site must yet pass through another filter. One that, til it is distinctly defined, is ruled by opinion. Note: Please, bear in mind - I don't like stuff being outright removed either. My wife is heavy into history, and actually does alot of photographic catalog'n for historical battles/artifacts/etc. Some stuff I know will be removed, but has historical relevence to me, I admit I download instantly for personal use, editing, etc. But under the same reasons, it is why I don't bother uploading all the other content I've made using the photos I have access to. Sad I know, but I'd rather not deal with the pitchforks.