Jump to content

zaty1

Members
  • Posts

    108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Nexus Mods Profile

About zaty1

Profile Fields

  • Country
    None
  • Currently Playing
    skyrim, terraria,borderlands2, bf3, d3, minecraft
  • Favourite Game
    tf2

zaty1's Achievements

Enthusiast

Enthusiast (6/14)

  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In
  • First Post
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Not original author - if I vaguely remember the last time - it was sourcing other peoples' textures/photos without permission... not necessarily.. a mod thief..
  2. "Texture thief" would get the mod pulled no matter what.
  3. I agree. I still have... can't even remember the name. The one for fo3 / megaton bar. I liked that one. Quick search - there it is... http://www.nexusmods.com/fallout3/mods/1990/?
  4. You've looked at this? http://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/1822/?
  5. Well, in theory - depending on what you use to stream.. it could sort of already be done. A few years ago I used to stream/save stuff - free music broadcasts online/etc. The program would just stream/download it to a single file - and I would play from that. So you'd start your program/stream in the background - nosound/don't play - and just have it redirected to the location for the radio station... and you'd fire up the radio station ingame and it would just start from there... in theory anyways. Might throw some errors about file being in use or something else - not sure.
  6. I had better success tinkering with prerendered frames 1 or turning triple buffer off while using vsync. While using a frame limiter - I also had better results using a cap of 58/59 vs 60. Some other things to mess around with.. if anything - ymmv.
  7. I'd keep making it. It may not be an issue now, but in the future - you'll also see modders fade/disappear or end support based on Bethesda updates, lack of interest, real life interference, etc. Actual file replacements might not need such upkeep - but still, everyone enjoys variety - well, I know I do atleast. :)
  8. I thought about this the first time he blocked a door. Then I wondered - does that remove his ability to also block people from coming after me? Will they run right through him?
  9. @ModofDuty - I can barely respond to you without derailing this topic and getting myself in trouble. So, here is more info than you need to negatively stereotype me. I'm an uncle to 6 children under 10. I have 3 brothers, I am the oldest, the youngest born when I was almost 16. I have done 1000's of hours of volunteer service work. I have no children. I have 2 cats - if that counts. If I had a child, I would protect it til my dying breath. Please, tell me that you know what goes on in my head. Are we still functioning on fact? or opinion? Are we functioning on a "possibility" now? That something may be used inappropriately? So I pose you a few questions-- Do we remove all guns mods from this site because I "might" use one to shoot a child in the face ingame? (WHOA) Would you let me, a stranger, buy your whole family icecream randomly one night? Do I really need to state a reason? For sake of argument, I don't tell you - my child was stillborn this day. Would you call the cops on me if your child ran into my frame as I snapped a picture of the sunset? How about if I was photopgraphing my nieces and nephews? "I am not trying to police peoples' thoughts. My argument is that removing and banning mods that can have the possibility of atrocious uses involving children should be implemented" Now, we want to put a measured definition on "possibility"? Seriously? My response pages ago stands - we will sit here and argue about hypocrisy, irony, and opinion. I'm willing to discuss logically - not emotionally. Start a new thread about the removal of kid oriented mods if that is your real position. This thread was about attempting to get an offensive tag for possibly offensive content. Edit- To the mods that constantly need to come check on this - I'm sorry.
  10. I understand your stance. But now, we are asking them to be thought police? Judiciously removing anything that can be twisted in a wrong way? And we weren't supposed to bring thought control into this conversation? I knew I shouldn't have bothered posting. Good day, ma'am.
  11. The Nexus is pretty tight on the ToS with their rules/content limitations. I doubt we will see pedophilia acceptable here anytime soon - ie. Never. Ever. To the reverse end of the spectrum though - how long til the Nexus is full of nothing but cheery (offensive) puppies (offensive) playing in rainbow glitter (offensive)? This is like debating what else should be outright banned from the ToS. Are killable children offensive - a fact? or opinion? What about killable..... adults? Killable... life? How do you define - offensive?
  12. Nah, I'm out. I honestly feel like I'm getting trolled now. Goodluck sir.
  13. In theory, under your proposition - they both stay on the site. As I've asked before - how do you define the rules. Horse moved to offensive. Cat is not. Why not both? How do you explain that to the 2 authors. How do you explain to me the rules that moved my horse mod to an offensive click wall, and the exploding cats mod was not. Bear in mind, again hypothetically, but if someone were to be intent on endorsements and praise for a mod, how do you explain the rules that define why they are "targeted". I'm ASKING HOW, if there is no "considerable debate" about the cat mod - does it get moved to offensive? A fair standard is not being applied if you base it on "considerable debate" in this example. The squeaky wheel is getting the grease. Making an offensive catagory just means essentially every mod up'd to this site must yet pass through another filter. One that, til it is distinctly defined, is ruled by opinion. Note: Please, bear in mind - I don't like stuff being outright removed either. My wife is heavy into history, and actually does alot of photographic catalog'n for historical battles/artifacts/etc. Some stuff I know will be removed, but has historical relevence to me, I admit I download instantly for personal use, editing, etc. But under the same reasons, it is why I don't bother uploading all the other content I've made using the photos I have access to. Sad I know, but I'd rather not deal with the pitchforks.
  14. I don't think I'm fully explaining what I mean and you might be taking my words literal and not the implied ideas behind them. This is my last approach. I make an exploding horse mod(MLP). It is gory - people find it offensive - Everyone loves MLP. It gets moved to offensive catagory because they huff and puff. You make exploding cat mod(HelloKitty). It is gory - people don't care. Everyone hates cats. Why? Opinion. (and an oddly weird set of beliefs in this example) I know my examples are silly - and all the stuff that is undefined will pop up, and quite possibly be silly. So how do you apply undefined rules? The tags are pretty factual, and offensive is hard to define - cut and dry. But, why does it need to be tagged anything. It has been a long time since I created my account. I could have easily accepted in the agreement that I may see potentially offensive content. Then what? What about clumping it with adult content/consent? If everyone truly did follow the rules in the ToS pertaining to file and imagedatabase comments - we wouldn't even know that anything offended anyone. But, hey - way different topic. Or, is it?
  15. @sherameyn - Actually I was using the rainbows - but knowing my wife's friends... meat definitely is offensive too... :(
×
×
  • Create New...