Deleted55545892User

Come to think of it, I've only been to one forum that had a like feature. Maybe I don't get around enough. It seems more common on news (comment sections) or media sites... in which case it makes more sense. Since the purpose of those "likes" tends to bump a well liked statement to the top.

Everyone has likes or dislikes. It's just human. There's nothing wrong with that (except when it comes to hurting people themselves..like some level of viciousness that hits at people's cores or something. This is not what we're talking about, I hope). But having an opinion on media or art is a good thing. And in many ways, it's PART of the experience of sharing art and partly fun.. to actually have those arguments. It EVEN fuels further art. I've come up with music that was partly borne out of being dissatisified. Entire genres have, in fact. Punk wouldn't even exist, for example, if Patti Smith and the Ramones and Iggy Pop were so happy-go-lucky about disco and 10 minute guitar solos. Their own music came out of being pissed off at the decadence happening to music in their time (both with companies and bands). And some of the greatest film directors were once critics.. or came out of film schools that did a lot of criticism.

Funny, I'm running Intel with Vega.. you're like the opposite. Although I'm considering moving to Ryzen as well. Outside of size, you're not going to notice upgrading the Evo much... if at all. edit: Err.. or did you already buy a Crucial? Oh well.. Still good to have more size.

That's PS3. It sucked, admittedly.. but it had nothing to do with dirty edits. But something wonky with the executable. It partly was save bloat, if I recall? It was just flat terrible. Bethesda patched that version a million times, and it never got to any stable condition. The biggest issue they tackled was the FPS drops and lagging. Sorry for speaking too much out of turn then.. I actually have a PS3 disc lying around somewhere, but it's still in shrinkwrap lol. Never got around to it. Generally speaking though, it seems they've made their way on many platforms and people seemed to play the vanilla game long enough on them.

I do that often. I guess I'm always leaving room for improvement. Nothing deserves all of my praise. Well, very few things do. Speaking of, I hate the many places have cowered from the star system. Netflix and YouTube in particular (Netflix particularly pisses me off, because they're protecting the feelings of professionals.. rather than YouTube protecting mostly amateurs). I hear that Netflix is now going to get rid of reviews entirely. They were so much better before they got involved in creating their own content. Now they're actively manipulative.

I can't bring myself to do that. It's really nothing to create some of the smaller mods. In fact, I think most people should and can do it. Most of the time, I'm just changing an entry to a different number. Voila! New gameplay. That's more to the Creation Kit's (and some other modern tools for other games) credit, rather than me. It's far more impressive if someone did that, say... thousands of times to thousands of entries (unofficial patches) or created a tool that lets players dynamically alter entries on the fly (MCM config options).

There's one on the beth.net site called "Marry Me Serana", but not sure how it works. I use a private port of Marriable Serana from LE. It works, but I can't give you copy myself. You'll have to learn how to port yourself. The author originally planned an official SE version, but went AWOL and no one has heard from him since.

This strategy makes sense to me for the Japanese. It helps them sell their electronic products in general. I can't fault them for trying that. It never made sense to me for Microsoft..who practically owns two platforms. It annoys me to no end (as you saw from my rant above). In fact, I'm reinstalling windows as we speak, and updating a few things from the App store. What sucks is a lot of the stuff shown on there is for the Xbox and won't run on PC. Like the Halo stuff. Or Sunset Overdrive. Those would do great on a PC (Halo was released way back when, but none of the sequels).

*pulls an arrow out of his quiver" :cool: Sorry, couldn't resist. ^^ Of course tastes are different. There's just one thing I disagree with: Neither Vivid Weathers nor any other weather mod costs much performance. None of the different weather mods does. In fact, it's the ENB presets most people use together with their favourite weather and lighting mods, that really take a hit on performance. Simply using a weather mod is fine. BTW, if you don't like a colorful look, NAT might be for you. Or Aequinoctium. Both rather subtle, "naturalistic" weather mods. ^^ Well, I'm looking for literal Oldrim looks.. rather than approximation. I've been testing two mods.. "No More Mario Sky" (lol) and "Skyrim Legendary Weathers". Both of them copy the imagespaces from the old game, but do it a bit differently. Skyrim Legendary Weathers is cool, but completely turns off Godrays. I want them back.. but keeping the settings at default is also too intense with those colors. @Devious780 : Cool.. Have fun :)

I wouldn't suggest messing with the FPS, since the physics are tied to it. Without it tied down, all kinds of wonky things happen.. carriages doing cartwheels, mammoths jumping 500 ft in the air. Unless you like that sort of thing :P But if you're still only getting 20 frames, you wouldn't see it. And yeah, 20 frames is bad. Not sure what could be causing it. You might be better off just letting the Skyrim launcher reset things to their defaults. Press "Ultra" or "High" on there and see what your framerate is like afterwards.

In the big picture, it doesn't matter to me.. since consoles are going to drag down my PC experience no matter what. I just have to live with it and be happy to just half-way improve things on PC. I don't feel like I'm at that much of an advantage over console users. Devs will always give consoles priority and cut down features in the base version of their games that ends up affecting PCs. And no amount of modding can truly improve it. For example, Skyrim can't truly have open city spaces. Sure, you can have an Open Cities mod, but the damage is already done when the default wasn't built that way. Modding an open city causes all kinds of compatibility issues, since it renames the city spaces to the "Skyrim" worldspace. And few want to patch every individual mod to rename spaces the way Open Cities does. If the game had already been built with open spaces in mind, this would be a non-issue. You could say this for all cells and anything requiring a loading screen. If this was a PC only game, little of this would have been necessary. Not to mention that these cities are so small to begin with.. They're like "symbolic" cities that belong in some Lego toy set. They don't resemble cities at all. And no amount of modding can expand the space. You can only make it more detailed.. but you can't make Whiterun 3, 4... 10 times the size. Not without breaking everything outside.. and then having to expand the whole world itself. And even then, you need special mods to open borders and expand those spaces. No mere plugin will do it. Some things are much easier to improve.. like individual models, textures, and such. But any kind of design decision that was system wide can never truly be improved. The only way out of this is if Microsoft realizes they've already lost the console war and totally devote their time to recreating a slick gaming experience for PC users. Rather than try to give people a "taste" of what PC gaming is like, they need to bring people to actual PCs instead. They will eventually lose the Xbox, but unlike Sony, they have a whole other platform here to take advantage of. Once (and if) they decide to truly back it, we'll see more PC games not taking so much crappy hardware into consideration. On a sidenote, I'd even say this is all having detrimental effects on the gaming world in less obvious ways: Rather than wowing gamers with more and more depth and breadth, game companies focus on small crap to lure people in. The kind of junk found in loot boxes, like weapon variety, different clothing and armor meshes and such. They don't seem either able or willing to enrich their gaming worlds anymore than with this small stuff. And flashiness in games is relegated to just more "bells and whistles". Things that don't push a system very much.. like DoF, lighting, spell effects, etc.. If we are to truly experience "next gen gaming", everything would be much BIGGER. Not just all of this small stuff looking prettier. This is a distraction, to make us think things are improving. They are not.

I've never used RLO, so don't know how efficient it is. Nor Vivid Weathers. Those two would cost you, but I don't really see any other mods you have to that would overly stress things. Maybe Magical College of Winterhold, but I doubt it.. since it's just limited to the College. You should stay away from heavy texture mods though. You should be able to get away with that Realistic Water mod you already have. If not, you can set the options to Normal size textures instead of High during install. Maybe do the same with the Enhanced Blood, but I doubt you'd even need to do that. What's your FPS? Because you're going to be limited to 60 anyways. It's hard to see why you can't already get that. I had a 1060 once and I had room to spare on that. So I'd imagine a 1050 would at least get to 60. TL;DR -------- At the risk of getting shot, I'd say to drop Vivid Weathers anyhow. It's junk. It had some appeal on LE, but I honestly don't see why it's still popular on SE. The default game already changed it's weather to that over saturated look that was so popular with some ENBs and Vivid on LE. It pisses me off that mods like that convinced Bethesda themselves to cave in and make their own crappy imagespaces. They had a good thing going with the Legendary weather look (and their concept art before that). It was deliberately blue and lacking some color.. JUST LIKE all winter cinematography. If Game of Thrones adopted the type of gaudy motifs and colors ENB users like, that show would be laughed at. "Winter is Coming" would have no meaning. But only in Skyrim modding world, is it praised. Like everyone wants to play Skyrim, reshaped to look like Julie Andrews in the Sound of Music.. dancing in a field of colorful lilies. Ugh. /rant :tongue: In short, since SE's default look already resembles Vivid, you're just needlessly taxing the system for a slightly different and equally crappy oversaturated look.

That's PS3. It sucked, admittedly.. but it had nothing to do with dirty edits. But something wonky with the executable. It partly was save bloat, if I recall?

Vanilla is fine on it's own. These games have run as expected for years, on multiple platforms. It's just that those dirty edits can be problematic with mods that make different references to things. It's not like Bethesda themselves have to take mods into account. Their games run fine as they delivered them. But cleaning them is for OUR benefit, after the fact of having a library of mod choices. Besides all that, Skyrim is the only game's ESMs that I clean. I leave Oblivion and Fallout alone.... because no one is even clear on what's worth cleaning or not. I don't think there's consensus.

I stand by this opinion, because I see how many people are in the rest of the world's environments. They don't put up with advertising and tracking with phone, mail, hate it when it's excessive in their media/TV, hate it spreading too much in their property/neighborhoods, etc.. The average person doesn't even want to interact at a damn shoe store, unless they first ask for assistance. The idea that people actually want all of this customized and tailor made for them (as internet ads function) is nonsense. That happened.....never. edit: OK, not true. The people asking for this in their lives are like housewives who hire interior designers... and then spill their guts for some reason, and tell their life stories. Still a miniscule segment of the population.