myrmaad

Dariusy banned. by request. Dariusy shall now be known as frenchmods.

Gelunis banned. Pirate, multi account abuser. Reference post

Cirofost banned. Trolling a file thread Reference post

CocaNuka banned. Flaming and trolling all at once on a file thread. Reference post

Alt account: Keisear banned along with the IP addy.

When you have a prototype to release, by all means, make a new thread, but there is too much bickering on this one. Closed.

Kennysan banned. Obvious pirate is obvious. Reference report

clown007 banned. Spammer. Nice try, Clown.

Fallout 3 disk does not require Steam, but Fallout New Vegas on Disk absolutely does.

burstlimit banned. Bragging about piracy. We have no use for you here, just go away. Reference post

Your unban request was received and after consideration we have agreed to allow your reinstatement. Although your entire appeal impacted our decision process, for me, personally, the most influential portion of your request was your opening statement: Protect your membership in the future, and welcome back.

Your unban request has been accepted. In future I advise you protect your membership.

Your unban request has been accepted. In future protect your membership.

r619 banned. Questioning staff action in the forums, supporting a troll, being a troll. READ THE TERMS OF SERVICE.

xX JonthE Xx Banned from chat for trolling staff, language, and being an all around chat brat. You had quite a few warnings, there will be no more.

the object to my left is my laptop. Battery life : 30 minutes : Perhaps I can Tweet for help!

edwinftw banned. Admitted piracy in chat Reference post

griggrig banned. Piracy of Skyrim Reference post

@stemin, you still didn't read the Terms Of Service I linked for you did you? The Terms of Service is where we prohibit expressing your distaste for a mod, (and provide that portion of my answer) Going on a mod release thread just to say you don't like the mod is not allowed, let me show you what comments are allowed: "from the Terms of Service regarding commenting rules," I mentioned previously: You are absolutely allowed to say I like this mod, but I'd like it better if it was not a replacer (feature request); but if you say, I don't like this mod because it's a replacer, well you're likely to be banned. The Terms are pretty darn clear. Anyway, Arthmoor, I would be completely amenable to authors being able to hide comments from all viewers except staff. I think the real issue here is peacekeeping. If there is no report, there is no evidence. We have days when we get a lot of reports but I can go through 30 or so in usually less than an hour, and we have plenty of staff nowadays. However, in the new Nexus 2.0 perhaps an author hide button that creates an auto report associated with the hide action would be the way to go. That way we can review if a problem brews. But I have to say the system now works pretty well, the reports keep us in tune with the pulse of the nexus, if you will. This is a very good thing, in my view. We can see personality conflicts brewing, we can see potential conflicts, accusations of stolen content can be routed out early and nipped in the bud before they cause real conflicts. I've seen this time and again. It applies to image share too, where a potential argument after some small intervention ended up creating a much more friendly and understanding atmosphere, because we were proactive and started a dialogue.

yodrich1 banned. Chat brat, can\'t follow the rules.

I usually look for the readme at the readme tab. It would be great if your Description is not the Readme (which I think is fine) then it might be a good idea to note in the description to see the Readme on the readme tab. However I would not have minded cleaning those idiot comments off that thread and this is why: once one idiot makes a nonsensical point like that, it seems like the lemmings like to jump on the nonsense bandwagon without ever thinking things through. @Stemin: if you are seriously going to make that argument, I'll quote you: .. it just proves to me that you either have not read the Terms of Service regarding commenting rules, or you failed to comprehend what you read. For example, we have someone today making a false accusation that a modder planted a game breaking virus in her mod, an insidious little virus it is too, because it has only detonated in one of 4000 plus downloads. :rolleyes: Even if there is a rare harmless comment that a modder has asked to have removed for their own reasons, what harm is there in deleting it. The mod page is the Modder's area, imagine it if you will as a booth at a convention. Someone walks by and sticks a yellow sticker on the table, the modder doesn't think should belong there, where he or she is presenting their wares to the world. It may even confuse people who associate the yellow sticker with something completely different. I come along and disinfect and remove the sticker. Problem solved.

Cmenaasheim banned. Admitted piracy of Skyrim in chat

Locked by Staff. Console modding is not discussed here.

Strike one for flaming, strike two for personal attack. Reference post