Jump to content

Do Aliens Exist: The Great Debate


Thor.

  

21 members have voted

  1. 1. Do aliens and Extraterrestrial life exist

    • Do aliens exist
      18
    • or do they not exist
      1
    • Do you beleive they visited earth
      6
    • or have they not visited earth.
      9


Recommended Posts

If you want life that resembles our own, yet we don't consider to be aliens, but alien like just do a search term. just finding another intelligent being on earth might change the way people think about themselves or the human race as a whole.

 

if you think this is ridiculous i have doubts about this finding myself, but the news was pasted all over the tv at one time, i still remember it to this day.

 

there is a 2hour long discloser that was aired on Discovery last may.

 

Intelligence level

Edited by Thor.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you want life that resembles our own, yet we don't consider to be aliens

Except it's the same exact crap... Blurry, brief images, still photos that are "enhanced", things that can be fakes... Ultimately uploaded to youtube by the local tin-hat wearing idiot who can't help but also include spooky/mysterious audio sounds, excessive notations, or unrelated pictures. Sure, the tin-hat crowd eats that stuff up, but for everyone else it just looks like a joke. As for the Discovery Channel... their credibility went out the window once they started fishing for ratings. Ancient Aliens, Monsterquest, all a bunch of dramatized crap with only a few hints of any value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Creeptastic the sound they make is creepy.

 

 

the actual 2hour documentary

First off, sound is one of the easiest things to hoax since anyone familiar with a sound editing program can take some source sound and modify it in such a way that it "sounds" like something unusual, mysterious, or creepy. Badly tuned acoustic equipment can also end up yielding those results. As for testing for linguistic signatures, that can be faked just by using a source audio that already has an element of language, like bird or whale calls.

 

Second, adding CG, actor reinactments with props, background noises, ect is not science. Animal Planet even had to go and pull the documentary and release a retraction statement over the generally poor quality in how facts were presented. Any truth which might have existed was totally crapped on by the need to speculate and theorize from the very limited amount of reports. And unfortunately, due to the way that the internet works... As soon as anything like this is put out there, there are handfuls of people out there who want to get attention by staging hoaxes, troll videos, doctoring photos, or outlining reasons as to why some group is trying to do a coverup so that if there was any corroborating evidence, it would only end up being buried under the heaps and heaps of bulls***.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vagrant is right. The auto world are like any sort of fanboys; when something big is coming they get super excited about any tidbit of info. Some prankster on Youtube managed to get over 3,000,000 hits simply by using a sound editing program to take a normal car engine and accelerate it to double speed. He actually managed to convince almost five million astute, knowledgeable people it was a real spy recording of next year's Renault Formula One car.

 

http://i3.ytimg.com/vi/pSUus85f6pM/0.jpg

The web is full of "cryptids" which are really just composite images. Hell, I've ever made a few in photoshop. See my sig? it's a composite of 3 images that's then had it's resolution dropped down by two-thirds to meet Nexus signiature regs.

Edited by Vindekarr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay :devil: , looks like a i have a challenge ahead. More compelling evidence coming.

Challenge excepted.

 

-------------

place holder youtube, your views will change. The nexus has a limit on Youtube links so some of it may be in link form.

Edited by Thor.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've got your work cut out for you there then, youtube just seems to host home videos of people who either made or were duped by hoaxes. I haven't seen a single piece of footage that has had me 100% convinced so far because as vagrant pointed out it always (conveniently) visually obscured to the point that you have to really squint at an "extraterrestrial" object until your eyes bleed before it looks semi-convincing, or it's close up and really obviously doctored.

 

It really grinds my gears when footage is presented in documentaries and they feel compelled to zoom in on an object until it's literally a mass of pixels to the point that it's no longer discernible as anything at all, and these are people who are supposed to scientists or ufologists but they don't seem to understand that zooming in on a low res image doesn't exaggerate anything, but instead just annoys me :facepalm:

 

I do believe there is alien life in our universe, whether it's here on earth or not is yet to be seen and WILL have to be witnessed by me first-hand until I am convinced instead of watching a guy being interviewed who "swears to god, his life, and his family" but I still 99% believe he a lying attention-seeking time waster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay :devil: , looks like a i have a challenge ahead. More compelling evidence coming.

 

Challenge excepted.

 

-------------

place holder youtube, your views will change. The nexus has a limit on Youtube links so some of it may be in link form.

I'll even give you some help with that.

 

http://people.csail.mit.edu/mrub/vidmag/

 

If you can find evidence of a working circulatory, muscular, or respiration system in instances where body proportions are beyond normal human range, then we'll have something to discuss. Keep in mind, you will probably need a reasonably high quality video to get reliable results with that program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still random alien stuffs coming, you be the judge.

 

 

Worthless crap. The same exact rubbish that people have been inspired by and hoaxed themselves. Absolutely nothing of value. Even if one were to account for differences in species and within a species, there is just too much biological inconsistency to render any of it meaningful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...