Jump to content

WebP Image Quality Issues


zed140

Recommended Posts

On 8/21/2024 at 4:11 AM, Pickysaurus said:

We've reverted to WebP 90% quality for now, but we will continue testing AVIF at some point in the next few weeks (the developers working on this are on annual leave). 

FYI, something's up with the reverted quality for older uploads. An example from my mod:

Hopefully the AVIF update works out. Thanks for the update!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, megaman2k said:

FYI, something's up with the reverted quality for older uploads. An example from my mod:

Hopefully the AVIF update works out. Thanks for the update!

I see, the old upload is slightly blurred -- especially with details like the guy's arm hair in the middle.

EDIT: It's also less than half the file size, ~70 KB vs ~176 KB.

Edited by AaronOfMpls
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have to add the report that webp has completely annihilated the quality of all the images I've uploaded that were specifically made to showcase dithering and the quality of my texture work. It's straight up gross.

I get it that you guys need to cut bandwidth costs but webp was not an upgrade to jpeg back then, and it's not an upgrade today, it's a side-grade with serious drawbacks and several edge cases with clearly worse quality.

Please do not bother with lossy webp. Either ensure the pngs are fully optimized, or jump all the way to jxl or avif like what seems to be in the works. You can also use lossless webp to replace png right now, as it provides about 10-20% size reduction while remaining lossless.

I'd like to suggest jxl because it's an order of magnitude faster to encode than avif at equivalent quality settings, however we're waiting for google to either get smacked by the EU or yield to the pressure of the rest of the industry.

Edited by daniilmaks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

could there be a compromise where the first 5 images of a mod are not subject to this really harsh compression? i understand the primary concern is page load speed, but for graphically oriented mods where you wanna showcase fidelity, you're gonna have to start linking to external galleries or embeds, where fine detail grain won't become banding or completely blurred

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...