The future technology

[Deleted54170User]

Thor.

 

One of the many pictures in the following link really gave me a sense your post with the interview had more validity. Putting any of the pictures in your first post as a lead picture with the interview following the picture would have encouraged my interest more prior to seeing the interview. The pictures at that link speak volume's just looking at them.

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=bosnian+pyramid&rlz=1C1SFXN_enUS499US499&espv=2&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=abbyU6zcF4KIogSxhoGIAg&ved=0CCgQsAQ&biw=1585&bih=820

 

While I watched and listened to the interview I had no questions about the 2 people being interviewed. After the interview was over I wanted their credentials validated.

 

Out of curiosity I wanted to validate their credentials and get their dig leader Semir Osmanagić to validate that they worked for him. What organization did Semir have copies of his journal sent to for examination about the dig and progress reports on the findings?

 

Does everyone on a dig site sign into a book and have their daily record of activities kept up and recent while they work at the dig?

[Deleted54170User]

It's just weird how all people can see with their own eyes, feel, smell, tastes and hear, and yet, a bunch of people who have been praised for their own endeavors after years of attending a scholastic organization are the only people whom with the rest of the people are supposed to believe in when a discovery is made. All of us are supposedly supposed to be in awe of them because of their diplomas, degrees, and Phd's.

 

I'm thinking we should show them respect for their diligent endeavors for discoveries, improvements, and careful techniques. But if they act like children when someone else, not so educated, finds a fine object of interest to all in the field instead of going to the aid and assisting in the authentication; there's something odd about them when they sound out like brats crying because they did not find it first.

[Thor.]

I would guess they have a website with some of their credentials. I dug into it myself questioning the authenticity of these pyramids, i did a background check, but never believe what mainstream says. Its as they said before, they even got to show the evidence of their finding yet the mainstream dismissed it without facts of why. just did without explanation or reason, the murder didn't happen. Or come up with bogus explanations even a child could see through.

Edited August 19, 2014 by Thor.

[Deleted54170User]

It is your trail of leads of each and every step you've taken to reach this realization that will bring to light, to your delight, what present awaits you when you add the final piece of your research. For within you are the desires to your own answer to your growing puzzle.

 

You will solve a mystery in your own way, via your own research, and you will be the wiser for it.

 

Put all your leads in line the way you followed them. Post them in the order of date and time you found interest and discovered them. Your posts will bring to light in your imagination what it is you found. A picture.

 

The big picture you will see and you will know irrefutably what you've found. When you've spent the total value of your own self worth, not money, all that was unclear will be made clear.

[Thor.]

I wish i had the same poetic wording as you :tongue:, but i can only imagine what might happen if this can't be debunked by mainstream, and it gets that big press release. How would the mainstream media think of the world then.

 

I mean its like covering up the pyramids of Egypt in plain sight. with a bustling city next door, open to the public.

Edited August 19, 2014 by Thor.

[Vagrant0]

On one hand, it could be that experts have actually seen the site, taken a look around, come to conclusions that it was natural, tried to present evidence of this to them, and they refuse to accept this evidence. It's just like flat or hollow Earth groups. Despite overwhelming evidence against their beliefs on the matter, that evidence that these groups cling to and which has not been reasonably explained justifies it in their own mind.

 

On the other hand, people who are in higher levels of academia are probably quite happy with having the world viewed in the way that they learned and have taught. Having anyone come around and bring up evidence to challenge long-standing beliefs, much less let someone with fewer credentials get the credit for it, ends up being something that questions their validity and is an assault to who they are. Naturally, it is unlikely that these people would get fair treatment even if there were not people actively out there committing hoaxes for sake of fame and a quick buck.

 

At the end of the day, neither side is willing to budge much.

[Thor.]

They mentioned that in the interview, the archeologists out right denied it.

 

I suggest you watch that video i linked.

Edited August 19, 2014 by Thor.

[Maharg67]

The colonization of the moon is necessary for more than reasons of it being more difficult or easier than colonizing Mars:

 

Luna (the Moon) is the 'high ground' above Terra (the Earth). Who ever gets to dominate Luna can militarily dominate Terra.

 

The main reasons colonization is needed on Luna are:

 

to stop any one power dominating the home world from high orbit

 

to be able to study Terra from its moon and to better study the other planets, including Mars, and also the stars.

 

Because it is simply easier to travel to Luna, and back, than it is to Mars. Time wise it is an amazing difference. It is odd how so many people down play the difference as if going to the local store is the same as traveling to the other side of a large nation.

 

As yet we know very little about Luna. Our geographical, geological, and other studies of it have just begun. Luna has been struck by many meteors, and meteorites, than has Terra. They are a big source of metals on the Earth so why not on the Moon.

The only real way we will understand the real potential of Luna will be to colonize it.

 

We can use Luna to construct, assemble, a larger and more effective ship to travel to Mars.

 

As for the Martian Moons, the lesser density of them means digging out space for underground colonies will be easier. They will also be great platforms for better studying Mars, from orbit, the rest of the solar system and the stars.

 

Mars has lower gravity than Terra but that still means it will be much harder to get back up into space from its surface than it will be to leave Luna. I once observed somebody's artwork with Eagle One like craft blasting off from the Martian surface; this would never be viable.

 

Going to Luna and going to Mars are very different propositions and people need to be careful about making easy comparisons between the two.

[Thor.]

This is more viable then anything landing or taking off from atmosphere then Nasa is planning, Nasa could do the rest with QVPT drive.

 

 

Of course this is all mainstream planning, who knows what they are up to

Edited August 19, 2014 by Thor.

[Deleted54170User]

One other probable reason is the people of the Archaeology group may not be getting interviewed. It is likely the interviewers of the media haven't reached and interviewed the real honest to goodness bunch.

 

Most of the honest to goodness bunch may be out in the field out of reach. The news person may not have found enough money in petty cash and/or could not to get enough money from their Editor to go seek out the Archaeologists and speak with the Archaeologists of import.

 

The true Archaeologists may not have had the time and many not have even been interviewed by the media.

 

Let me think? If Indiana Jones were on an expedition and the school paper at his University received a bunch of requests to interview him, and his bosses gave no comment, it might be like the time a guy drew a sea serpent and printed it telling a story about how it killed a bunch of sailors.

 

Oh! What sensationalism!

 

Newspaper and news media people have been known to do anything to get the attention of fans who read their articles and that watch their shows.

 

Hmm?