Vagrant0 Posted July 18, 2010 Share Posted July 18, 2010 Perhaps removing them from the latest pictures? Otherwise they are necessary for adult mods to describe what they do. It's not that they are art or porn, it's that people cry for screenies in order to know what the mod does. Especially cosmetic mods which make up most of the adult section anyways. I suppose required censoring would clear this mess of a debate up, but someone would debate against it.For the Hundredth time... MODS ARE NOT NOW, NOR WILL EVER BE AFFECTED BY THE RULE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, SHAPE, OR FORM. It's rather easy to tell if an image containing nudity for a mod is intended to show off the texture/ect of the mod, or if it's just there for someone's jollies. If you need to show an image of a woman being brutally penetrated by two guys to show off your hair mod, you clearly need better judgment skills, and it would have been removed even before the rule change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surenas Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 Perhaps removing them from the latest pictures? Otherwise they are necessary for adult mods to describe what they do. It's not that they are art or porn, it's that people cry for screenies in order to know what the mod does. Especially cosmetic mods which make up most of the adult section anyways. I suppose required censoring would clear this mess of a debate up, but someone would debate against it.For the Hundredth time... MODS ARE NOT NOW, NOR WILL EVER BE AFFECTED BY THE RULE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, SHAPE, OR FORM. It's rather easy to tell if an image containing nudity for a mod is intended to show off the texture/ect of the mod, or if it's just there for someone's jollies. If you need to show an image of a woman being brutally penetrated by two guys to show off your hair mod, you clearly need better judgment skills, and it would have been removed even before the rule change. I hope that this free zone does not include user uploaded nude images as add-ons to the mod descriptions, for otherwise everything I've read up to now would reveal itself as being rather too-too. And that'd be awkward... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagrant0 Posted July 19, 2010 Share Posted July 19, 2010 I hope that this free zone does not include user uploaded nude images as add-ons to the mod descriptions, for otherwise everything I've read up to now would reveal itself as being rather too-too. And that'd be awkward...Well, why would you need to upload a sex scene, to help fill in the description of a hair mod? The mod in question is not an adult mod, and the scene in question both fails to show off the content of the mod, and seems like a generally bad measure of judgment. There is a difference between nudity for the sake providing an example of the mod content, and gratuitous nudity simply for the sake of nudity. It would be handled no differently than how other images unrelated to the mod content would be handled. It was only mentioned because, as you well know, there are those out there who would deliberately upload a slightly adjusted skintone mod just so that they can upload their sex and bondage images to that mod in an effort to get around the image share restrictions. Such images, although containing the content of the mod, would likely result in the mod being hidden from view and the user in question warned and instructed to upload more suitable images. It is however worth mentioning that so far, such instances have been rare, and most mods and images uploaded to mods have content which is fitting and suitable for that mod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
species5478 Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 I don't see anything wrong with nude imagery, mods, etc. Other things are more offensive to my sensibilities. Killing, is one example. I think mods or images that include violence, blood and gore, are more offensive than those that portray sexual acts or themes. Sex, and depictions of sexual acts are human notations of pleasure and procreation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surenas Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 @ Vagrant0 It was just a friendly reminder to an imo extant backdoor and a possible return of the old problem on a new front... :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myrmaad Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 I don't see anything wrong with nude imagery, mods, etc. Other things are more offensive to my sensibilities. Killing, is one example. I think mods or images that include violence, blood and gore, are more offensive than those that portray sexual acts or themes. Sex, and depictions of sexual acts are human notations of pleasure and procreation. And at one time the majority probably agreed with you, until the imagery became a representation of the violent, misogynist, disrespectful objectification of women. Loving kindness is always beautiful, respect is always pleasantly received, but most of those images were quite literally abusive in the disrespectful depiction of women as whores. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimboUK Posted July 20, 2010 Share Posted July 20, 2010 I don't see anything wrong with nude imagery, mods, etc. Other things are more offensive to my sensibilities. Killing, is one example. I think mods or images that include violence, blood and gore, are more offensive than those that portray sexual acts or themes. Sex, and depictions of sexual acts are human notations of pleasure and procreation. And at one time the majority probably agreed with you, until the imagery became a representation of the violent, misogynist, disrespectful objectification of women. Loving kindness is always beautiful, respect is always pleasantly received, but most of those images were quite literally abusive in the disrespectful depiction of women as whores. It got worse then that, there were one or two depicting children in sexual acts or inappropriate poses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
species5478 Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 I don't see anything wrong with nude imagery, mods, etc. Other things are more offensive to my sensibilities. Killing, is one example. I think mods or images that include violence, blood and gore, are more offensive than those that portray sexual acts or themes. Sex, and depictions of sexual acts are human notations of pleasure and procreation. And at one time the majority probably agreed with you, until the imagery became a representation of the violent, misogynist, disrespectful objectification of women. Loving kindness is always beautiful, respect is always pleasantly received, but most of those images were quite literally abusive in the disrespectful depiction of women as whores. It got worse then that, there were one or two depicting children in sexual acts or inappropriate poses. Well, yeah. I agree wholeheartedly. Extreme sexual acts, and depictions of acts like child porn, rape, bestiality, necrophilia, etc., is not only unacceptable, but mentally perverse and highlights a malfunction of the soul. I endorse love making, and the type of nudity one might find in an art gallery. Not to keep bringing this up, but not all violence is bad either. Boxing is violent, but it's a sport. Whereas the torture and mutilation of an innocent person is perversely extreme. So I'm against extreme imagery that abuses people and animals in any way. if someone is trying to upload child pornography on a site like this, I would assume this person is trying to get in contact with either a child, or a like minded person to share content with. I'd love it if there was a way to report this person to the authorities because chances are, they're a sex offender in real life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobCoPublicReassurance Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 I am just irritated by the fact that people have some obsession with uploading pictures of half-naked/naked unnaturally-large-breasted girls doing erotic things in EVERY FRICKING MOD. Any good house mod, weapon mod, gameplay mod, or most other kinds of mods has these pictures. I mean, do I need to see a half-naked, creepily large-breasted, leering anime-style girl every time I look at the pictures of Ancient Towers and the like? I don't need or want her to understand the quality and function of the mod. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surenas Posted July 21, 2010 Share Posted July 21, 2010 Guess we’ve never talked about GIRLS - or we spell the term totally different for some time past. Moreover, we shouldn't repeat the strange actions of former smokers now, that is - to mutate into mad dogs at holy war, for that really looks more than just irritating. New rules are established and already soon we'll know if they come up to expectations or not. http://www.abload.de/img/anne9hol.gifinside Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts