JimboUK Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 It's something they don't take seriously, FO3s dialogue was atrocious, NPCs came across as one-dimensional tropes with mental problems, FO4s isn't as bad and there are a few memorable characters, characters that are memorable for the right reasons, unlike FO3s who were memorable for all the wrong reasons. The guy who wrote FO3 got an award for it, that's like giving Uwe Boll an Oscar. FO4 isn't a bad game by any stretch of the imagination, it's just lacking when it comes to being an RPG. They want it back because fo3 offered choices. While not the best writing of all time, it offered RPG value for different moral instead of limiting to one character trope. This the main problem for many with fo4. While MQ were lame, side quests were cool. Now they are not. With FO3 you could wander around and do your thing at your own speed, you could also avoid fighting, FO4 throws fights at you non-stop, things even come out of the ground. Please don't get me wrong, I like FO3, I have many 100's of hours clocked up, as for FO4, guess which one of these two I'm bored with.... http://puu.sh/liXJE/8ca7ac9d48.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boombro Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 That....is... new vagas.Are you sleepy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimboUK Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 That....is... new vagas.Are you sleepy? I know what it is, I'm comparing it to FO4, my FO3 is the old GLWL DVD so I don't have the numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boombro Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 For me, I'm going back to Skyrim earlier than I though.I hope the next TES won't be like this. That would be horrible. Those are my favorite. Oh god. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginnyfizz Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Everything you guys said...plus graphics that are actually worse than FO3. I just cannot believe how bad they are. Guess I have been spoiled by Witcher 3 and Skyrim. Yes I like nice graphics. My eyesight is pretty poor so I need decent graphics to see what I'm doing, even with meh contacts or specs on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boombro Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 (edited) graphics that are actually worse than FO3, Guess I have been spoiled by Witcher 3 and Skyrim.Okay, they are not as bad. http://kotaku.com/fallout-3-vs-fallout-4-in-screenshots-1712122808 But they are not what a game from 2013 should look like anyways. And get better glasses for god sake. Edited November 12, 2015 by Boombro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginnyfizz Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 They have Prada frames and Essilor lenses, so they don't come much better. Problem is when you get to my age and have been short sighted all your life, then start to get the middle aged sight issue with near objects, it's over to the contacts PLUS reading glasses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boombro Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Oh sorry, you look younger.I guess you have to get used to it or play TW3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayglo98 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 Graphics worse than (vanilla) FO3 ? That is just trolling non-sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts