Jump to content

Who are you voting for?


kvnchrist

Recommended Posts

 

 

 

Is nature the Earth in your opinion's?

 

 

Could the frenzy during occasions of ritual madness we experience in different ways when we are at different ages, 5 to 12; 13 to 20, and so on, be because of the Earth's seasonal changes?

 

I'd say, for me, nature just accounts for the way things are. Physics, mathematics, life, dreams, whatever...

 

And yeah I'd say even if you don't believe in a 'higher power' there are larger forces at work that likely affect us in ways we are perhaps unaware (moon, gravity, light, temperature)... Which goes back to the 'common consciousness' thing again.

 

 

Common consciousness?

 

Which does that relate to best, "the collective conscience" or "the collective conscious?

 

 

I suppose a conscience is perhaps a retrospective view of the conscious.

 

Politicians have obviously become very good at removing themselves from, or, completely ignoring the collective conscience.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 439
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

 

 

Is nature the Earth in your opinion's?

 

 

Could the frenzy during occasions of ritual madness we experience in different ways when we are at different ages, 5 to 12; 13 to 20, and so on, be because of the Earth's seasonal changes?

 

I'd say, for me, nature just accounts for the way things are. Physics, mathematics, life, dreams, whatever...

 

And yeah I'd say even if you don't believe in a 'higher power' there are larger forces at work that likely affect us in ways we are perhaps unaware (moon, gravity, light, temperature)... Which goes back to the 'common consciousness' thing again.

 

 

Common consciousness?

 

Which does that relate to best, "the collective conscience" or "the collective conscious?

 

 

I suppose a conscience is perhaps a retrospective view of the conscious.

 

 

In your opinion then, is there such a thing as a completely good conscience while a person is conscious?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

Is nature the Earth in your opinion's?

 

 

Could the frenzy during occasions of ritual madness we experience in different ways when we are at different ages, 5 to 12; 13 to 20, and so on, be because of the Earth's seasonal changes?

 

I'd say, for me, nature just accounts for the way things are. Physics, mathematics, life, dreams, whatever...

 

And yeah I'd say even if you don't believe in a 'higher power' there are larger forces at work that likely affect us in ways we are perhaps unaware (moon, gravity, light, temperature)... Which goes back to the 'common consciousness' thing again.

 

 

Common consciousness?

 

Which does that relate to best, "the collective conscience" or "the collective conscious?

 

 

I suppose a conscience is perhaps a retrospective view of the conscious.

 

Politicians have obviously become very good at removing themselves from, or, completely ignoring the collective conscience.......

 

 

Are you suggesting none of them really has campaigned outside their home theater where they've been making believe they were in other states campaigning so they could say they did and say they won a lot of votes there?

 

When in truth they are so scared to go outside their private family and all, so afraid that some stranger, probably an old man or old woman who love them, not real relatives of theirs, might cough in the room sending germs flying.

 

Oh! God! They might contract something from someone, who got snot on their clothes from the coughing couple with old age disease and die from natural causes. :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

Is nature the Earth in your opinion's?

 

 

Could the frenzy during occasions of ritual madness we experience in different ways when we are at different ages, 5 to 12; 13 to 20, and so on, be because of the Earth's seasonal changes?

 

I'd say, for me, nature just accounts for the way things are. Physics, mathematics, life, dreams, whatever...

 

And yeah I'd say even if you don't believe in a 'higher power' there are larger forces at work that likely affect us in ways we are perhaps unaware (moon, gravity, light, temperature)... Which goes back to the 'common consciousness' thing again.

 

 

Common consciousness?

 

Which does that relate to best, "the collective conscience" or "the collective conscious?

 

 

I suppose a conscience is perhaps a retrospective view of the conscious.

 

 

In your opinion then, is there such a thing as a completely good conscience while a person is conscious?

 

 

I'm not sure I believe in objective morals, but rather more in karma or a sort of balance.

 

So I would say yes and no. It depends which way you want to look at it, but then how you 'see' it may not be how it all works out...

 

As for politicians and those in the 'upper hemispheres' of our society, well they live in a different perspective of the world so their common sense will be different to most of us. But then things can change very quickly, look at Snowden, the US election drama, or the Panama Papers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is nature the Earth in your opinion's?

 

 

Could the frenzy during occasions of ritual madness we experience in different ways when we are at different ages, 5 to 12; 13 to 20, and so on, be because of the Earth's seasonal changes?

 

I'd say, for me, nature just accounts for the way things are. Physics, mathematics, life, dreams, whatever...

 

And yeah I'd say even if you don't believe in a 'higher power' there are larger forces at work that likely affect us in ways we are perhaps unaware (moon, gravity, light, temperature)... Which goes back to the 'common consciousness' thing again.

 

 

Common consciousness?

 

Which does that relate to best, "the collective conscience" or "the collective conscious?

 

 

I suppose a conscience is perhaps a retrospective view of the conscious.

 

 

In your opinion then, is there such a thing as a completely good conscience while a person is conscious?

 

 

I'm not sure I believe in objective morals, but rather more in karma or a sort of balance.

 

 

So I would say yes and no. It depends which way you want to look at it, but then how you 'see' it may not be how it all works out...

 

As for politicians and those in the 'upper hemispheres' of our society, well they live in a different perspective of the world so their common sense will be different to most of us. But then things can change very quickly, look at Snowden, the US election drama, or the Panama Papers...

 

 

 

In your opinion what are some of the differences between a royal, even a newborn of any class, baby's common sense and say, a full grown man's common sense who is a king?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is nature the Earth in your opinion's?

 

 

Could the frenzy during occasions of ritual madness we experience in different ways when we are at different ages, 5 to 12; 13 to 20, and so on, be because of the Earth's seasonal changes?

 

I'd say, for me, nature just accounts for the way things are. Physics, mathematics, life, dreams, whatever...

 

And yeah I'd say even if you don't believe in a 'higher power' there are larger forces at work that likely affect us in ways we are perhaps unaware (moon, gravity, light, temperature)... Which goes back to the 'common consciousness' thing again.

 

 

Common consciousness?

 

Which does that relate to best, "the collective conscience" or "the collective conscious?

 

 

I suppose a conscience is perhaps a retrospective view of the conscious.

 

 

In your opinion then, is there such a thing as a completely good conscience while a person is conscious?

 

 

I'm not sure I believe in objective morals, but rather more in karma or a sort of balance.

 

 

So I would say yes and no. It depends which way you want to look at it, but then how you 'see' it may not be how it all works out...

 

As for politicians and those in the 'upper hemispheres' of our society, well they live in a different perspective of the world so their common sense will be different to most of us. But then things can change very quickly, look at Snowden, the US election drama, or the Panama Papers...

 

 

 

In your opinion what are some of the differences between a royal, even a newborn of any class, baby's common sense and say, a full grown man's common sense who is a king?

 

 

Not entirely sure I understand the question, but I would say it totally depends on the situation and the person. Some kids have lots of problems but achieve a lot, some have lots of advantages and get in lots of trouble. Some kings, queens and heads of state are loved by their people, some are not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is nature the Earth in your opinion's?

 

 

Could the frenzy during occasions of ritual madness we experience in different ways when we are at different ages, 5 to 12; 13 to 20, and so on, be because of the Earth's seasonal changes?

 

I'd say, for me, nature just accounts for the way things are. Physics, mathematics, life, dreams, whatever...

 

And yeah I'd say even if you don't believe in a 'higher power' there are larger forces at work that likely affect us in ways we are perhaps unaware (moon, gravity, light, temperature)... Which goes back to the 'common consciousness' thing again.

 

 

Common consciousness?

 

Which does that relate to best, "the collective conscience" or "the collective conscious?

 

 

I suppose a conscience is perhaps a retrospective view of the conscious.

 

 

In your opinion then, is there such a thing as a completely good conscience while a person is conscious?

 

 

I'm not sure I believe in objective morals, but rather more in karma or a sort of balance.

 

 

So I would say yes and no. It depends which way you want to look at it, but then how you 'see' it may not be how it all works out...

 

As for politicians and those in the 'upper hemispheres' of our society, well they live in a different perspective of the world so their common sense will be different to most of us. But then things can change very quickly, look at Snowden, the US election drama, or the Panama Papers...

 

 

 

In your opinion what are some of the differences between a royal, even a newborn of any class, baby's common sense and say, a full grown man's common sense who is a king?

 

 

Not entirely sure I understand the question, but I would say it totally depends on the situation and the person. Some kids have lots of problems but achieve a lot, some have lots of advantages and get in lots of trouble. Some kings, queens and heads of state are loved by their people, some are not.

 

 

I asked you to give some examples of the difference of common sense in a child compared to an adult. In your opinion there are differences in situations and common sense applied therein.

 

I did not require an answer involving any situations.

 

Reread the question. Do you see any implication given therein asking you to define anything except common sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is nature the Earth in your opinion's?

 

 

Could the frenzy during occasions of ritual madness we experience in different ways when we are at different ages, 5 to 12; 13 to 20, and so on, be because of the Earth's seasonal changes?

 

I'd say, for me, nature just accounts for the way things are. Physics, mathematics, life, dreams, whatever...

 

And yeah I'd say even if you don't believe in a 'higher power' there are larger forces at work that likely affect us in ways we are perhaps unaware (moon, gravity, light, temperature)... Which goes back to the 'common consciousness' thing again.

 

 

Common consciousness?

 

Which does that relate to best, "the collective conscience" or "the collective conscious?

 

 

I suppose a conscience is perhaps a retrospective view of the conscious.

 

 

In your opinion then, is there such a thing as a completely good conscience while a person is conscious?

 

 

I'm not sure I believe in objective morals, but rather more in karma or a sort of balance.

 

 

So I would say yes and no. It depends which way you want to look at it, but then how you 'see' it may not be how it all works out...

 

As for politicians and those in the 'upper hemispheres' of our society, well they live in a different perspective of the world so their common sense will be different to most of us. But then things can change very quickly, look at Snowden, the US election drama, or the Panama Papers...

 

 

 

In your opinion what are some of the differences between a royal, even a newborn of any class, baby's common sense and say, a full grown man's common sense who is a king?

 

 

Not entirely sure I understand the question, but I would say it totally depends on the situation and the person. Some kids have lots of problems but achieve a lot, some have lots of advantages and get in lots of trouble. Some kings, queens and heads of state are loved by their people, some are not.

 

 

I asked you to give some examples of the difference of common sense in a child compared to an adult. In your opinion there are differences in situations and common sense applied therein.

 

I did not require an answer involving any situations.

 

Reread the question. Do you see any implication given therein asking you to define anything except common sense?

 

 

Wasn't sure if you were asking about just kings or not. Either way I would give the same answer anyway.

 

To perhaps put it another way, I think that things simply get more complex the more aware of the complexities we become. For example, if a baby puts their hand on a hotplate it hurts, they scream. The adult does the same thing, it hurts, they scream, and then they start asking questions as to why it hurts, 'how could I be so stupid?', could there be a way to make hotplates not burn you?

 

It's like the wooden chair I referred to before. The chair in its original form and the splintered broken chair. It is the 'same' chair, only becoming more complex. This principle seems to permeate the universe - the most complex of structures are made of ever simpler parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is nature the Earth in your opinion's?

 

 

Could the frenzy during occasions of ritual madness we experience in different ways when we are at different ages, 5 to 12; 13 to 20, and so on, be because of the Earth's seasonal changes?

 

I'd say, for me, nature just accounts for the way things are. Physics, mathematics, life, dreams, whatever...

 

And yeah I'd say even if you don't believe in a 'higher power' there are larger forces at work that likely affect us in ways we are perhaps unaware (moon, gravity, light, temperature)... Which goes back to the 'common consciousness' thing again.

 

 

Common consciousness?

 

Which does that relate to best, "the collective conscience" or "the collective conscious?

 

 

I suppose a conscience is perhaps a retrospective view of the conscious.

 

 

In your opinion then, is there such a thing as a completely good conscience while a person is conscious?

 

 

I'm not sure I believe in objective morals, but rather more in karma or a sort of balance.

 

 

So I would say yes and no. It depends which way you want to look at it, but then how you 'see' it may not be how it all works out...

 

As for politicians and those in the 'upper hemispheres' of our society, well they live in a different perspective of the world so their common sense will be different to most of us. But then things can change very quickly, look at Snowden, the US election drama, or the Panama Papers...

 

 

 

In your opinion what are some of the differences between a royal, even a newborn of any class, baby's common sense and say, a full grown man's common sense who is a king?

 

 

Not entirely sure I understand the question, but I would say it totally depends on the situation and the person. Some kids have lots of problems but achieve a lot, some have lots of advantages and get in lots of trouble. Some kings, queens and heads of state are loved by their people, some are not.

 

 

I asked you to give some examples of the difference of common sense in a child compared to an adult. In your opinion there are differences in situations and common sense applied therein.

 

I did not require an answer involving any situations.

 

Reread the question. Do you see any implication given therein asking you to define anything except common sense?

 

 

Wasn't sure if you were asking about just kings or not. Either way I would give the same answer anyway.

 

To perhaps put it another way, I think that things simply get more complex the more aware of the complexities we become. For example, if a baby puts their hand on a hotplate it hurts, they scream. The adult does the same thing, it hurts, they scream, and then they start asking questions as to why it hurts, 'how could I be so stupid?', could there be a way to make hotplates not burn you?

 

It's like the wooden chair I referred to before. The chair in its original form and the splintered broken chair. It is the 'same' chair, only becoming more complex. This principle seems to permeate the universe - the most complex of structures are made of ever simpler parts.

 

 

In my opinion the answer to my question is, "No." There is no difference, age doesn't matter, common sense is the same, only our experiences are different!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...