Jump to content

When will this insanity end. Another CP site found!


kvnchrist

Recommended Posts

I think part of the problem here is, when folks are referring to pedo's, they reference CONVICTED peds..... those that have actually taken some action in pursuit of their desire. I think we can all agree this is a bad thing?

 

For those that "just look at pictures", and do whatever..... ya gotta keep in mind, someone has to MAKE those pictures..... I haven't met a little girl yet, that has told me she wants to be a porn star before she hits puberty.....

 

For my part, ANYONE that would take sexual advantage of a child, deserves to be taken out of circulation. Permanently. Be it prison, or a hole in the ground. End Of Problem.

 

That's exactly my point right from the start. I was never defending the sex offenders, I was defending those who aren't sexual offenders. Not even all pedophiles look at pictures of naked children. Some people around here seem to think that all pedophiles are sex offenders.

 

Did I say that all pedophiles are abusers. You don't need to have scientific proof to know that not all pedophiles are abusers. All you need to do is look at google how many people who are in jail, right now, for getting caught with pictures of little girls to see that. These people don't act upon their urges, but they certainly become they audience that gives those who do make child pornography an incentive to make more of these videos.

 

Look at the child modeling industry, for instance. It is a booming industry, that makes millions of dollars

 

webe web

 

Then what exactly was the problem? And looking at pictures of little children is definitely acting on your urges. Look at my reply to HeyYou just above here. I've been saying all along that not all pedophiles are sexual offenders, and that includes looking at pictures of little children.

 

Also, not all pedophiles even support the child modelling industry. You can't blame it's existence on pedophiles. The biggest abuse that occurs in the child modelling industry is the parents who abuse their children by putting them through that in the first place.

 

I blame child modeling on the parents. Why anyone would subject a child to that kind of environment/pressure is absolutely beyond me. I think that should be considered child abuse as well..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think part of the problem here is, when folks are referring to pedo's, they reference CONVICTED peds..... those that have actually taken some action in pursuit of their desire. I think we can all agree this is a bad thing?

 

For those that "just look at pictures", and do whatever..... ya gotta keep in mind, someone has to MAKE those pictures..... I haven't met a little girl yet, that has told me she wants to be a porn star before she hits puberty.....

 

For my part, ANYONE that would take sexual advantage of a child, deserves to be taken out of circulation. Permanently. Be it prison, or a hole in the ground. End Of Problem.

 

That's exactly my point right from the start. I was never defending the sex offenders, I was defending those who aren't sexual offenders. Not even all pedophiles look at pictures of naked children. Some people around here seem to think that all pedophiles are sex offenders.

 

Did I say that all pedophiles are abusers. You don't need to have scientific proof to know that not all pedophiles are abusers. All you need to do is look at google how many people who are in jail, right now, for getting caught with pictures of little girls to see that. These people don't act upon their urges, but they certainly become they audience that gives those who do make child pornography an incentive to make more of these videos.

 

Look at the child modeling industry, for instance. It is a booming industry, that makes millions of dollars

 

webe web

 

Then what exactly was the problem? And looking at pictures of little children is definitely acting on your urges. Look at my reply to HeyYou just above here. I've been saying all along that not all pedophiles are sexual offenders, and that includes looking at pictures of little children.

 

Also, not all pedophiles even support the child modelling industry. You can't blame it's existence on pedophiles. The biggest abuse that occurs in the child modelling industry is the parents who abuse their children by putting them through that in the first place.

 

 

In your response to heyyou you reference people who call themselves pedophiles who don't act upon it. The very though that little girls are attractive is an act. Please don't tell me that these people don't act upon this mindset. That they don't peer at every little girl and have fantasies about them. To say so would give you an incite that no one has, other than the individual themselves

 

It is they desire for these pictures that creates the need for these web sites. What do you mean you can't blame the existence of the industry on pedophiles. Who do you think supports it. The Church Lady

 

 

http://i54.tinypic.com/16kx1d5.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I fully agree with you on that. I wish they'd stomp down on it entirely. From the few documentaries I've seen on it so far, it is certainly not in the children's best interest to put them through what they are being put through. That's no way for a child to grow up.

 

In your response to heyyou you reference people who call themselves pedophiles who don't act upon it. The very though that little girls are attractive is an act. Please don't tell me that these people don't act upon this mindset. That they don't peer at every little girl and have fantasies about them. To say so would give you an incite that no one has, other than the individual themselves

 

It is they desire for these pictures that creates the need for these web sites. What do you mean you can't blame the existence of the industry on pedophiles. Who do you think supports it. The Church Lady

 

*Very deep and exasperated sigh*

 

I've covered this all very extensively in previous posts. I'm NOT going through it again. You can reread my previous posts, if you want, but I'm not explaining it again.

 

Also, here's an example of the logic you're employing:

 

You once thought your sister looks attractive. This means you acted on it! You committed incest!

 

Attraction to a child is not a crime, neither is feeling an attraction 'acting on it'. Spreading child pornography and sexually harming a child is a crime.

 

But really now, it's 22:30 here where I'm at. I've been reiterating everything over, and over all day long. I'm tired. I'm really not in the mood to even argue with you anymore, because you simply miss the point of it all. If the entire audience and supporters for child modelling consists of pedophiles, we've got a pedophile epidemic on our hands. Bring your flamethrower. Anyways, I'm going to bed now.

 

Good night.

Edited by Halororor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I fully agree with you on that. I wish they'd stomp down on it entirely. From the few documentaries I've seen on it so far, it is certainly not in the children's best interest to put them through what they are being put through. That's no way for a child to grow up.

 

In your response to heyyou you reference people who call themselves pedophiles who don't act upon it. The very though that little girls are attractive is an act. Please don't tell me that these people don't act upon this mindset. That they don't peer at every little girl and have fantasies about them. To say so would give you an incite that no one has, other than the individual themselves

 

It is they desire for these pictures that creates the need for these web sites. What do you mean you can't blame the existence of the industry on pedophiles. Who do you think supports it. The Church Lady

 

*Very deep and exasperated sigh*

 

I've covered this all very extensively in previous posts. I'm NOT going through it again. You can reread my previous posts, if you want, but I'm not explaining it again.

 

Also, here's an example of the logic you're employing:

 

You once thought your sister looks attractive. This means you acted on it! You committed incest!

 

Attraction to a child is not a crime, neither is feeling an attraction 'acting on it'. Spreading child pornography and sexually harming a child is a crime.

 

But really now, it's 22:30 here where I'm at. I've been reiterating everything over, and over all day long. I'm tired. I'm really not in the mood to even argue with you anymore, because you simply miss the point of it all. I'm going to ed now.

 

Good night.

 

 

I don't care how dramatic you put things with your *Very deep and exasperated sigh* You want to try out for a soap opera this isn't the place for it

 

When you are apart of the target audience that makes making these site a viable option for people making money, then you become part of the problem. My issue with you is how you portray them. You see all of this as something that can be cured. A little talk and it subsides, as if it was a cold or a flu.

 

We do have an epidemic on our hands. To make light of that shows just how detached you are from this, but from all I've read, you've made that abundantly clear.

 

I've never missed any of your so-called points. I disagreed with them. You making it sound like I did is simple arrogance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lucky for me, Iron Man 2 came on TV soon after my last post, so I'm still awake to respond. I'll indulge you one last time.

 

When you are apart of the target audience that makes making these site a viable option for people making money, then you become part of the problem. My issue with you is how you portray them. You see all of this as something that can be cured. A little talk and it subsides, as if it was a cold or a flu.

 

I've. covered. this. before. Seriously, I'm not doing it again. Read my previous posts and stop making insinuations about it. Only then will you see I never said a good little old chat will cure them of pedophilia. Hell, am I posting in martian or something?

 

We do have an epidemic on our hands. To make light of that shows just how detached you are from this, but from all I've read, you've made that abundantly clear.

 

To claim that the entire target audience of child modelling companies are pedophiles is just, well, silly. Sure, a lot of pedophiles probably keep an eye on it, but they probably don't even make out a tiny fraction of that. There's more to child modelling than a quick fapfapfap. :/ And no, I'm also NOT getting into the motivations behind child modelling.

 

I've never missed any of your so-called points.

 

If you didn't miss them, you ignored them, because you keep bringing up stuff that I've covered over, and over, and over.

 

And now I'm really going to bed. I'm not going to respond to you any further, because the argument is just running in circles right now, and it's going to continue doing so because we're just arguing past each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(mode=sarcasm//type=dark=begin)

 

To molest and rape children is a crime.

 

To be a bad parent, overfeed them so they die young from diabetes, is not a crime.

To be a bad parent, give them loads of sh.t, but no love, so they commit suicide later on, is not a crime.

To teach children (young girls) that the ideal weight is 75 lb, so you can count their bones, so they will suffer from anorexia, is not a crime

 

(mode=end sarcasm)

 

JC, how the world is black and white for many of you. No room for people with disorders. Kill them, jail them, knock them down you say. That will sure remove the symptoms, but not the desease. Isn´t it just another pachtwork to continue that way? How about accepting that we acctually are dealing with some sick people, and we could help them? We could have some research, perhaps some medicine that helped. Good for the pedophiles, good for the little children, good for all of us. Halohoror I read all your post, and agree with you. Kudos for your courage. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, yeah, sure. There is a "cure" for pedophiles. Just like there is a cure for gays. Or serial killers, or sociopaths. Etc. We don't have the faintest idea just what "makes" a pedo what he is. Nor do I expect that we will know for quite some time, if ever. There is research going on now, mapping the brain, and attempting to discover just what does what, I think it is more likely some 'knowledge' will come from that research, than any that can be done on those with aberrant behaviors. (not lumping gay's into this category) Considering the 'success' we have had with psychotropic drugs for treating things like depression, etc, Don't expect anything to happen for a couple more generations, at least. In the mean time, what do we do with these individuals? Should we be more 'understanding' that they have 'issues', and find some way to tolerate them in our society? Or, should we continue as we are, and lock them up? Removing the CURRENT threat from society. (albeit, not as successfully as we would like)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should we be more 'understanding' that they have 'issues', and find some way to tolerate them in our society? Or, should we continue as we are, and lock them up? Removing the CURRENT threat from society. (albeit, not as successfully as we would like)

 

Pretty much just get pedophiles professional help to help them suppress their urges, and anybody who commits a crime of sexual abuse or who is found in possession of materials pertaining to sexual abuse against minors should get locked up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Halororor, I am gay and resent being compared to paedophiles. To the person who lumped homosexuals in with serial killers, you ought to be ashamed of yourself.

 

An adult taking advantage of a child is wrong. A person who has urges to take advantage of another's defenceless state needs help to prevent hir from doing such a thing. Paedophilia is a disorder like narcissistic personality disorder or psychopathy and if there's a way to keep sufferers from harming others without bloodshed, I am all for it. People with mental disorders that involve violent psychosis are still people after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Halororor, while I see you thought process of trying to see the pedophile as more than a common criminal...as someone that needs to be studied more as to why sometimes they commit these acts and why some are able to restrain themselves through their lives. However....if I found out that my neighbor of some 60 years old, was a pedophile in thought but not action...I would have the deepest sympathy for them if they should announce this and to try to seek help.

 

But I would never leave my daughter alone around them. Ever...

 

So the patience people have for this kinda thing only goes so far. Unlike homo or bisexuality which usually is between two consenting adults....the practice of pedophilia is not. It is considered one of the most heinous and unforgivable of crimes because it is...at its base...an act that takes advantage of the innocence of the victims and in turn strips forever away that same innocence.

 

There isn't a lot of wiggle room here for trial and error when it comes to treating these people. Either you have to put them away or find something that will forever stop them from harming another child as long as they live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...