Boombro Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 (edited) . Game from 2011 simply can't have these specs... Except beth games. The mod that would expand things the most for console players, Interesting NPCs, will not be ported simply because Bethesda will not be hosting any files larger than 2GB. Guess that sort of proves the "elite" nature of PC gameplay. We've got the best and you've got the restI don't know about the size of audio, but they can just limit the mod by removing custom resources. I read the steam reviews of remastered versions that the gamers don't like them.It will simply be skyrim with better textures and some add ons. The port will suck like normal. That should be it. Edited October 19, 2016 by Boombro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mastian1997 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 (edited) I will switch in a year, maybe. I'm acutally satisfied with the good old Skyrim and much of my mods will not be compatible with the Special Edition. Edited November 6, 2016 by Mastian1997 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brakier Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 What the hell is this? System RequirementsMINIMUM:OS: Windows 7/8.1/10 (64-bit Version) Processor: Intel i5-750/AMD Phenom II X4-945 Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 470 1GB /AMD HD 7870 2GB Storage: 12 GB available spaceRECOMMENDED:OS: Windows 7/8.1/10 (64-bit Version) Processor: Intel i5-2400/AMD FX-8320 Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 780 3GB /AMD R9 290 4GB Storage: 12 GB available spaceFor built in ENB-preset? I can get one looking 10 times better which requires much less power. Game from 2011 simply can't have these specs...its the same req as fallout 4, and it is a lot higher then it need to be, i got everything on max and i dont got a 3gb G card, then again, i always limit my beth games to 30 fps, even if not needed as it help the papyrus and is the only real improvement you can make to get better ms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brakier Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 I want to see if 64 Gigs of ram will make a difference, so yes, I'll be switching. 64 engine, not 64 gigs, and one big reason is also, its DX11. fallout 4 has very good stabilty, you can have saves up at 40-50 mb whitout even having a savebloat. where 20mb is skyrim was unplayable. so ye, i hope it becomes as stable as fallout 4. pretty sure the papyrus is tweaked in some ways to. otherwise i dont see how settlements could work as they handle so much real time data. if you wanna know how much a 64bit engine can handle its about 8 tb, that number is the most realistic number. could probly be alot higher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boombro Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 I don't think they will change the ai, but skyrim SE should handle heavy script mods so much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Signette Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 What the hell is this? System RequirementsMINIMUM:OS: Windows 7/8.1/10 (64-bit Version) Processor: Intel i5-750/AMD Phenom II X4-945 Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 470 1GB /AMD HD 7870 2GB Storage: 12 GB available spaceRECOMMENDED:OS: Windows 7/8.1/10 (64-bit Version) Processor: Intel i5-2400/AMD FX-8320 Memory: 8 GB RAM Graphics: NVIDIA GTX 780 3GB /AMD R9 290 4GB Storage: 12 GB available spaceFor built in ENB-preset? I can get one looking 10 times better which requires much less power. Game from 2011 simply can't have these specs...its the same req as fallout 4, and it is a lot higher then it need to be, i got everything on max and i dont got a 3gb G card, then again, i always limit my beth games to 30 fps, even if not needed as it help the papyrus and is the only real improvement you can make to get better ms. My friend has overclocked GTX 980 ti with 6Gb of VRAM, Core i7-6900K and 16 GB of RAM, in Fallout 4 he drops below 40 in some areas, that is unacceptable for the visuals game has. Some people (most I think) on PC can't play below 60 FPS, for me it gives headaches and it should work on 60 if game officially supports it. There are enough complaints on overall game optimization. If they'll do same crap in Skyrim, it will be hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lachdonin Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 If they'll do same crap in Skyrim, it will be hilarious.You mean like literally every game Bethesda has ever made? Their optimization is garbage. If you don't accept that going in, it's on you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fair300 Posted November 5, 2016 Share Posted November 5, 2016 i do not plan to switch because haft the mods i use are out of date and will not be geting update at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts