skyrim dumbed down for consoles you say? nope, just 360

[frapfap]

its dumbed down to work on the 360, not just consoles in general

 

the 360 has the worst graphics and processing unit of the two (ps3/360)

 

ps3 is built from the ground up as a 1080p blueray quality system, the 360 can only support 720 in game resolution (been proven a long time ago, no disputing that).

 

 

if it wasnt for the shitty xbox limitations, the game could have been made a lot better than it was.

 

the ps3 is very powerfull and can handle a lot more than people think.

 

my computer has better graphics than a ps3 but barely cuz im running dual graphics cards..the ps3 uses the Nvidia RSX card / ps3 exclusive design

The ps3 has 2x the processing power in it that my computer does (ps3 has over 23Ghz combined processing power) vs my computers 3ghz quad core (12ghz combined)

 

AND I RUN THE GAME ON FULL ULTRA ON MY PC @ an average of 60-80fps--- which means the ps3 can also

 

 

so dont be prejudice against it being dumbed down for consoles, its was dumbed down for the 360, and thats it

 

 

if they made skyrim on a ps3 basis and not 360, the game would have to be called red ring of skyrim cuz the 360 would have exploded from attempting to process that level of graphics

Edited December 1, 2011 by frapfap

[Lachdonin]

So, you're basing every complaint on the game being 'dumbed down' on a graphics dispairity on the 360, when the system its self already have better graphics capibilities than 70% of the computers currently in circulation? Are you an idiot?

 

The dumbing down is not solely limited to the graphics. in fact, the graphics are superior than those in Oblivion. The dumbing down comes from changes to the interface, skill ranges and overall gameplay. Those are not graphical issues, and thus have nothing to do with what you're talking about.

 

It's also an absolutely moronic claim to say that the graphics capibilities of a system are the determining factor in their superiority over eachother. a lot more goes into these systems than just graphics.

[Guss]

 

if it wasnt for the shitty xbox limitations, the game could have been made a lot better than it was. :down:

 

 

a lot better graphics maybe. but if you compare to the others made this is a lot better looking even though the highest i compared to was this game on high with no mods to improve it. MGS , crysis games i know they are super but its the makers and how good they are if i am right. adding quest and new abilities etc doesn't matter what system its made for. idk they might have more mods to come in the future to adv it more.

 

come on if its not bugs its graphics something else?

 

got to think to as a maker what you can do to make the graphics to so that we can get many people to buy and able to run on the system, about 50% of the people or more don't have easy 2k+ super computers home made not buy companies, i know how good they can get :) .

Edited December 1, 2011 by Guss

[frapfap]

So, you're basing every complaint on the game being 'dumbed down' on a graphics dispairity on the 360, when the system its self already have better graphics capibilities than 70% of the computers currently in circulation? Are you an idiot?

 

The dumbing down is not solely limited to the graphics. in fact, the graphics are superior than those in Oblivion. The dumbing down comes from changes to the interface, skill ranges and overall gameplay. Those are not graphical issues, and thus have nothing to do with what you're talking about.

 

It's also an absolutely moronic claim to say that the graphics capibilities of a system are the determining factor in their superiority over eachother. a lot more goes into these systems than just graphics.

 

rofl

 

games quality is based on the graphics in my opinon.

 

how good the graphics are is a major determining point on whats good and whats not.

 

with your logic, skyrim would be just as good on the old 8 bit pc systems

 

ps3 is a far superior system. gaming is about the experience, and the experience is always better with better graphics capabilities. with that said, thats why ps3 is built from the ground up as a blue rap 1080p system (all ps3 game discs are blue ray) and the 360's max game resolution of 720, isnt

Edited December 1, 2011 by frapfap

[Dambuster]

^what? Starting a console war is unwise. My PS3 runs this game horribly. My friends xbox360 also runs this game horribly. My OK laptop runs this game OK. My PC runs this game incredibly.

Before getting my new PC 3 days ago I played this game on PS3 and xbox 360 before amazingly being able to play it on my laptop (Intel HD graphics 3000 - you never fail to surprise me). The loading times on the consoles make this game incredibly irritating - this game is too good and shouldn't have been released for consoles.

 

 

I thought I'd post in the non-sensical ranting style of all previous posts in this thread.

[frapfap]

i played oblivion on ps3 and skyrim now on pc. im use to playing on both setups.

 

even tho ive played on both and im use to how each work / are set up. skyrim is a completely different setup in general and took a bit of getting use to.

 

so with that said, ui is negated from the argument and every failed graphics rendering falls on basis that if it wasnt dumbed down to be processes on a 360, they could have made the graphics better, with less problems.

 

tell bethesda to make a blue ray game / no problems cuz thats the frontline of technology and they can throw everything at it

 

tell bethesda to make an xbox game, in the same format as the HD blueray 1080p ps3 setup... wont happen cuz it wont work on 360 cuz it cant process that level of graphics..

 

so to make it easier, they base it all of 360 so everything can play it. upgraded machines can process lower quality things but low quality pieces of s*** like 360 cant process higher than their capabilities. thats why its based off 360. for ease and to save money.

Edited December 1, 2011 by frapfap

[JimboUK]

Both are well past their prime, I'll be happy when they finally get updated. As for 1080p, that requires more memory, something neither console is blessed with.

[Nadimos]

yeah the ps3, didnt they use it with linux to build a supercomputer for the navy or something like that? and then sony came and patched it, so people could not use linux anymore. either way i hope an update is coming soon. means the games will scale better on pc. Edited December 1, 2011 by Nadimos

[audioave10]

I don't have consoles and I'm sure the PS3 is nice and all that...but just study the history of Sony as a Company and you will understand why I don't give those morons any of my money for anything they make.

[Lachdonin]

rofl

 

games quality is based on the graphics in my opinon.

 

how good the graphics are is a major determining point on whats good and whats not.

 

with your logic, skyrim would be just as good on the old 8 bit pc systems

 

ps3 is a far superior system. gaming is about the experience, and the experience is always better with better graphics capabilities. with that said, thats why ps3 is built from the ground up as a blue rap 1080p system (all ps3 game discs are blue ray) and the 360's max game resolution of 720, isnt

 

I'm sorry, and it's not often i make personal attacks, but you are a retard. Story, content, handling and player support are the qualities which drive the gaming industry. There are tens of millions of gamers who play games withoutdated graphics on a regular basis. Its a proven fact that great graphics do NOT make a game an instant it.

 

Graphics may be important to you, but anyone who doesn;t have their head up their ass knows that there is a lot more to the success of a game than having good graphics. Some of the best selling and most popular games have outdated graphics even at the time of their release.

 

Personally, i don't care what you like, what i care about is the fact that the statistics, sales records and simple facts render your arguement completely false. Period.