Thandal Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 Thx, Surazal! Glad to get feedback from an IE9 (beta, or RC?) user. One note: the text disappears on the white skin. But using this tag makes it visible on both the white and dark settings! :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surazal Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 Thx, Surazal! Glad to get feedback from an IE9 (beta, or RC?) user. One note: the text disappears on the white skin. But using this tag makes it visible on both the white and dark settings! :thumbsup:Oops - will use Ornage instead - forgot about the white backgrounds :) Using IE9 RC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamcakes Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 Text on the Signature Restrictions listed below the signature edit section should be updated to reflect the restrictions listed in The Official Thread. It currently reads: Your signature may contain: Any number images Images of any size Any number of URLs Any number of lines I just got a warning for a reasonably sized image in my signature, and I feel any kind of strike I would have recieved for that should be lifted. :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddah Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 Text on the Signature Restrictions listed below the signature edit section should be updated to reflect the restrictions listed in The Official Thread. It currently reads: Your signature may contain: Any number images Images of any size Any number of URLs Any number of lines I just got a warning for a reasonably sized image in my signature, and I feel any kind of strike I would have recieved for that should be lifted. :confused: I guess you missed the size limitations:Read the OP:http://www.thenexusforums.com/index.php?/topic/1721-avatars-and-signature-limits/ This line is of interest.2. Sig's can only be 450w x 300h pixels in size...this includes TEXT and PICTURES. For text, thats about 8 lines max. Max file size 110kb, this doesn't leave much for animation. Yours greatly exceeded that in width. Buddah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamcakes Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 Text on the Signature Restrictions listed below the signature edit section should be updated to reflect the restrictions listed in The Official Thread. It currently reads: Your signature may contain: Any number images Images of any size Any number of URLs Any number of lines I just got a warning for a reasonably sized image in my signature, and I feel any kind of strike I would have recieved for that should be lifted. :confused: I guess you missed the size limitations:Read the OP:http://www.thenexusforums.com/index.php?/topic/1721-avatars-and-signature-limits/ This line is of interest.2. Sig's can only be 450w x 300h pixels in size...this includes TEXT and PICTURES. For text, thats about 8 lines max. Max file size 110kb, this doesn't leave much for animation. Yours greatly exceeded that in width. BuddahYes, I'm aware of them now. The limitations listed in the profile edit area are not the same as in that thread. It's contradicting. I posted a link to both the limitations thread, and the section of profile editing with the conflicting text for your convenience so you may view it yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVampireDante Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 and I feel any kind of strike I would have recieved for that should be lifted. :confused: A strike was never issued, there was no reason to as you responded quickly to the resize request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thandal Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 But arguing with the Staff about it in the public forums will earn you one quickly! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamcakes Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 Just because that is the only part of my post they are addressing, doesn't mean that I am here to argue. :thumbsup: I just want to make sure no one else gets confused about the limitations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkeWolf Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 I have to say it, but yeah.... I have to agree here. One part of the site saying that there's no restrictions and then another part listing the restrictions IS kinda confusing. My 2 cents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thandal Posted February 26, 2011 Share Posted February 26, 2011 The one part of the site doesn't say "no restrictions". It says "any NUMBER", not "any SIZE". But I agree that we should be consistent and place the same info in both locations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Posted by Dark0ne,
3 reactions
Go to this post
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now