nosisab Posted December 30, 2011 Share Posted December 30, 2011 @Fatalmasterpiece Actually it is how GPL and general copyleft licenses work, common sense and abiding to the rules is all that is asked (for example, you can't make proprietary a previously open source piece or take exclusive credit of it) So, yes, I love it "already" :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatalmasterpiece Posted December 30, 2011 Share Posted December 30, 2011 Sure, if you don't mind being incredibly unproffessional and uncouth. Whenever you upload materials you should refer people back to the original source rather than offer it yourself. It's just good manners, even with free ware. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptbptb Posted December 30, 2011 Share Posted December 30, 2011 Yeah, I don't particularly want to annoy those in authority here, but Nexus policy does get bent on occasion. I know of at least one case where a new mod including illicitly copied copyright material was (naturally) disallowed, but the exact same material in an older (very popular) mod did not result in that older mod being taken down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myrmaad Posted December 30, 2011 Share Posted December 30, 2011 Yeah, I don't particularly want to annoy those in authority here, but Nexus policy does get bent on occasion. I know of at least one case where a new mod including illicitly copied copyright material was (naturally) disallowed, but the exact same material in an older (very popular) mod did not result in that older mod being taken down.No. you don't get to make such accusations. What proof do you have that the "older (very popular) mod" was ever even reported? If you don't have proof I don't want to hear it. You can PM me with the details but I know of several rumors like this that were completely unfounded and debunked. Furthermore our policy is that you may not upload copyrighted assets without permission. CD Projekt has given permission and the converter also termed it a "Resource". We have a similar longstanding policy for S.T.A.L.K.E.R. assets.End. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptbptb Posted December 30, 2011 Share Posted December 30, 2011 (edited) No. you don't get to make such accusations. What proof do you have that the "older (very popular) mod" was ever even reported? I personally reported it. I know that the PMs were received, because I got replies. [EDIT] It's a long time ago, so I don't have those PMs now. The 'older (popular)' mod was, IIRC, the sexlivion / sexdarkness mods that use audio taken from a commercial adult game. The new mod was one I initially included in my list of Japanese Oblivion mods, but took down the link after seeking clarification on Nexus policy. Edited December 30, 2011 by ptbptb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myrmaad Posted December 30, 2011 Share Posted December 30, 2011 No. you don't get to make such accusations. What proof do you have that the "older (very popular) mod" was ever even reported? I personally reported it. I know that the PMs were received, because I got replies. [EDIT] It's a long time ago, so I don't have those PMs now. The 'older (popular)' mod was, IIRC, the sexlivion / sexdarkness mods that use audio taken from a commercial adult game. The new mod was one I initially included in my list of Japanese Oblivion mods, but took down the link after seeking clarification on Nexus policy. I don't know what IIRC is but I'm looking into it. I'm familiar with the copyright issue and know that we have disallowed all the mods that included those contentious files, as far as I know at this moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatalmasterpiece Posted December 30, 2011 Share Posted December 30, 2011 No. you don't get to make such accusations. What proof do you have that the "older (very popular) mod" was ever even reported? I personally reported it. I know that the PMs were received, because I got replies. [EDIT] It's a long time ago, so I don't have those PMs now. The 'older (popular)' mod was, IIRC, the sexlivion / sexdarkness mods that use audio taken from a commercial adult game. The new mod was one I initially included in my list of Japanese Oblivion mods, but took down the link after seeking clarification on Nexus policy. I don't know what IIRC is but I'm looking into it. I'm familiar with the copyright issue and know that we have disallowed all the mods that included those contentious files, as far as I know at this moment.IIRC is "if I remember correctly". :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myrmaad Posted December 31, 2011 Share Posted December 31, 2011 I'm not familiar with that mod ;), but I found some relevant posts. Just to clarify, there were no actual "File Reports" though, which does make a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimboUK Posted December 31, 2011 Share Posted December 31, 2011 http://www.skyrimnexus.com/downloads/file.php?id=5001 Does anyone know if the head in this mod is the same one Square Enix had removed from a RE5 modding site? I haven't reported it because I'm not sure but thought it worth mentioning just in case someone knows more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myrmaad Posted January 1, 2012 Share Posted January 1, 2012 It has been reported. I have just been looking at it in the last few minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts