This may sound sexist (I'll admit it sounds sexist because it is) but there don't seem to be a lot of male marriage candidates of the sort that real women actually fantasize about. All the Alpha Leader types are off-limits, like the Archmage of Winterhold, the Jarls, the Orc Stronghold dudes (though I think polygamy is a turn-off) or, if the bad romance novels my stepmom used to read are any clue, "King in Rags" Madanach and decidedly non-sparkly Lord Harkon. (Yes, many women have terrible taste in imaginary men; the "ravaged by shirtless pirate" scene doesn't make it into every romance book ever written for no reason.) A Skyrim character aimed at the romance novel demographic would for obvious reasons have to forego any hint of the non-consensual relations typical to the genre, but if you want a challenge there you go. And could someone explain the whole Farkas thing? He's not a "bad boy", he's not smart, he's not a leader, he's not artistic, he's only about as athletic as the other Companions, he's not witty, and if my daughter brought this guy home I'd be disappointed enough to hope it was just a phase she was going through, though I admit she could do worse -- I mean at least it's not that drunk guy. Still I don't get it ... what's the deal? Why Farkas?