menathradiel

First of all, thank you for fixing image placement on the new design. :thumbsup: Just a couple of questions: Will mod authors be given the option of uploading a new background picture for the Mod info header? Since the one I have right now is all fubar. The expanded files download section is rather clunky. Personally, I think it would be better if the virus report (safe to use, etc) was next to the file download options as it was in the old design, rather than above it as it is in the new one. It's not like there's not room for it; there's an acre of space. In the logs section there is also a list of people who endorse. Is this something only I see as the mod author? Or does everyone see this? If the latter then this is really going to clog up a section that should be about updates to the mod and not who has liked it, because presumably it is meant to take the place of the old "uploaded on Xdate" "last updated on Xdate" information? I like the new larger default font! Can someone tell me what it is so I can use it? Edit: Also, how long have you been renaming my file downloads for? Are you making any other automatic changes to my files?

In response to post #54677498. #54680143, #54686903, #54687293, #54688648, #54688928, #54689253, #54689373, #54689458, #54689713, #54689868, #54689943, #54690023, #54690088, #54690318, #54690618, #54690843, #54691443, #54691698, #54692043, #54692763, #54693868 are all replies on the same post. We could compare notes on why your OS is difficult, but actually what this comes down to is you telling me that I should expect people to install something to make the internet work. If I want more than one image per line then I should not expect this site to work like any other, instead I should ask people to install an additional prog to make bbcode code here work as it does elsewhere. I'm not going to do that. If it comes to it I will take my money, and my mod, elsewhere.

In response to post #54677498. #54680143, #54686903, #54687293, #54688648, #54688928, #54689253, #54689373, #54689458, #54689713, #54689868, #54689943, #54690023, #54690088, #54690318, #54690618, #54690843, #54691443, #54691698, #54692043 are all replies on the same post. @pacfish Can I load a google spreadsheet here? Even if I can, will it load for anyone else but me? It's unreasonable to expect people to install something just so something else will work as it should, especially if that thing is a few pictures on a desc page.

In response to post #54677498. #54680143, #54686903, #54687293, #54688648, #54688928, #54689253, #54689373, #54689458, #54689713, #54689868, #54689943, #54690023, #54690088, #54690318, #54690618, #54690843, #54691443 are all replies on the same post. "Oh so now it's about me, not about a mod description being accessible to as many users as possible. Alright. I see you're just looking for reasons to pick fights and be angry, so I'm walking away, I have mods to make, and stuff." I can't win the debate (because I have no argument that makes sense) so I'm going to flounce away and call you prejudiced in the hope it catches on. *skipping merrily*

In response to post #54677498. #54680143, #54686903, #54687293, #54688648, #54688928, #54689253, #54689373, #54689458, #54689713, #54689868, #54689943, #54690023, #54690088, #54690318, #54690618, #54690843, #54691698, #54692043 are all replies on the same post. @pacfish I would have preferred not to use images with text, but the only other format is tables, and they don't work here. I tried, a lot, to make the text not tied to the image by using tables but it always ended up totally borked. So I did the only thing I could.

In response to post #54671943. #54672703, #54677478, #54678053, #54681883, #54683388, #54683578, #54686488, #54686998, #54687253, #54687418, #54687503, #54688283, #54689173 are all replies on the same post. "Keeping both sites live and optional is not a wise idea" Because most people would choose the old design, and we can't have that.

In response to post #54677498. #54680143, #54686903, #54687293, #54688648, #54688928, #54689253, #54689373, #54689458, #54689713, #54689868, #54689943, #54690023, #54690088 are all replies on the same post. @Dark0ne: "if you refuse for whatever reason to do away with the image descriptions" Yes, I'll make all my mod description text only. Never mind those who need visual images, just so long as your new site works, eh? You can explain to me all day what a thing is, I will not understand until I see it, and I include the seeing in my description. Never realised that this is a bad thing to do until you decided it was. My mod has been on this site for five years, with not a whisper, but now suddenly it's bad to have pictures. Not just bad, according to Elianora, I'm literally discriminating against people with sight problems by using pictures. A problem only now, not before. A problem, I'm willing to bet, only because I disagreed.

In response to post #54677498. #54680143, #54686903, #54687293, #54688648, #54688928, #54689253, #54689373, #54689458, #54689713, #54689868 are all replies on the same post. @Elianora You are hilarious. When complaining about images you cite those with sight problems, but when it comes to people who need visuals... You might as well have said to shut up and stop complaining because this disability doesn't factor in your world view. You are a hypocrite.

In response to post #54677498. #54680143, #54686903, #54687293, #54688648 are all replies on the same post. @Elianora: I have a text description. If you had bothered to even look at my mod page you would know this. I use images to supplement it - and btw, I do it for people like me, people on the autistic spectrum who need visual images because text is not enough. So I would kindly ask that you stop assuming things about me when you know absolutely nothing.

In response to post #54671943. #54672703, #54677478, #54678053, #54681883, #54683388, #54683578, #54686488, #54686998, #54687253, #54687418, #54687503 are all replies on the same post. All right. (that would be why all the major websites have a mobile version, because that is a thing of the past.... but shhhhh, not your point, is it.) What part of this design is "responsive" to me? The part where it's arbitrarily decided that my description layout is not good enough as I have coded it and decides to break it? Don't get me wrong. I'll get used to the new design, but I'll also have to spend time making my mod page layout compatible with PC users again, which is insane when you think about the fact that this site is for people who use mods for PC games.

In response to post #54671943. #54672703, #54677478, #54678053, #54681883, #54683388, #54683578, #54686488, #54686998, #54687253 are all replies on the same post. @SharraShimada: It is normal for a website to have a desktop and mobile version - and I know this because I maintain several - so your point is rather invalid.

In response to post #54677498. #54680143 is also a reply to the same post. ikr. Ugh. I'm probably going to have to spend time redoing the images to get it to display properly again.

In response to post #54676808. #54678143 is also a reply to the same post. It's like Google news. All this white space... Except I didn't pay google for the privilege of being ignored.

Have had a look at the new design and have to say: Why did you bork my description page? Why are you forcing every image to display on a new line even when in bbcode and wysiwyg editors they are not? It looks absolutely horrible, and makes me look like I put no thought or effort into my mod page. If I put two images on the same line, I do that for a reason. Yes, it's nice that the video is bigger, but you have every single one of my NPC pictures on a separate line, and they do not need it - this would be why I didn't do what you've essentially forced me to do. Take a look at my nexus page for my mod on the old layout, and then the new layout, and then explain to me why you've made it look so excruciatingly bad on the new one, and why I can't fix it?

I love everything to do with Hermaeus Mora's realm. Okay, not everything, just a few things really. Well, actually only one. BOOKS! Spent ages in there because I overencumbered myself picking up all the books and refused to put any of them down again. Yes, some people love the new armours, the new swords, new puzzly dungeons. Me, I am wandering Solstheim and having a nerdgasm when I find a book I haven't read yet. :facepalm:

Speaking of the Lusty Argonian Maid... I was in a nordic ruin full of Rieklings. Got some distance in, putting arrows in the angry garden gnomes as I went, then stopped to look around for any interesting loot and found a pile of Lusty Argonian Maid books in one of the Riekling tents. A whole pile of them, both volumes, like some Riekling fetish library.

The trouble is that this only works if the site in question has other options than paypal, as most of the prepaid cards can't be used with paypal. Or at least this was the state of affairs when I used to use one for internet transactions. I think now there are some that can be used with paypal, but most of those are so expensive to use that it's really not worth it unless you have no other option. In general, I think that a good option for the supporter fee would be a text message that charges, if it could be implemented.

Came back to update. I still get the errors when importing a mesh, even when using the settings that the above mentioned tutorial told me to. However, the meshes load into blender (with either tutorial) and I am able to edit them, so should I just ignore the python errors, since they do not appear to be affecting functionality? Also, I tried to import an Oblivion mesh, to see if that would work, and it did with no errors, so perhaps this is something to do with Skyrim meshes or a step I am missing in NifSkope? What I do in Nifskope. Change User Version & User Version 2: 11 and 34 respectively. Delete the branches for BSLightingShaderProperty. Save as new file. If there's something else I should be doing it is not mentioned in either of the tutorials. edit: confusion over numbers, got them backwards.

And no offence, but you have two posts here, both on this thread. True, but I did confirm he was 100% correct. ;) Give him/her some kudos for making a correct, and relevant 1st post. :thumbsup: Aye, I know. Apologies to you, CoeurConnect. It was late and I was in a rather strange mood. So sorry.

And no offence, but you have two posts here, both on this thread.

Yes, I understand that if you intend to redistribute them you should get permission, but I'm asking about times when you mod a mod just for yourself.

This is something I have been wondering for a while, about the etiquette of modding a mod. Say that, for example, you find an armour mod that you really like, but the colour is not to your taste - for example, this armour, which I love but wanted a Stormcloak colour theme for. Is it okay to recolour something for your own personal use without seeking permission from the author of the mod? Or should you refrain from doing so unless you ask? I'm not talking about recolours that you intend to make available on nexus, but ones you will use only in your own game. Is there a rule about modding a mod if you only want to change it in your own game, or is it one of those grey areas that has no rule? (A note: I am using this armour as an example. I have recoloured this with Grace Darkling's permission.)

First person. I can't stand that the view from horses is fixed in 3rd person, especially when the view in 3rd person is so terrible. I ride my horse with my weapon drawn so I can have a better view of upcoming terrain. The default view is useless; I'd like to not watch the back of my chars ass when something attacks me.

Thanks for the link! It seems like a much more comprehensive tutorial than the one I have been using. I'll let you know if it helps.

I've decided to try and learn how to make meshes, but since I've never done anything except retexture before (which is a relatively simple process, let's be honest) I thought it would be better to play around with one of the vanilla Skyrim armours, just to learn my way around blender and get the hang of things before taking on the more ambitious project of creating something from scratch. I'm having a problem importing the armour I've chosen (basic female hide) into blender. I've followed the steps in this tutorial, downloaded and installed everything it says, but I keep getting a series of python errors when importing the mesh into blender. I've followed the instructions about editing the mesh with NifSkope before importing, but it doesn't seem to be working. Is there another step that the tutorial has missed? Any help would be most appreciated!