Afghanistan, Iraq, who next

[link]

Now that Afghanistan and Iraq have been dealt with, who will Bush and Blair go for next.

[The_Reaper]

Probably North Korea.....

[link]

Hmmmmmmmmmm

 

Iran, the ruskies have supplied them with nuclear reactor parts, and the chinese have sold them a nuclear catalyst.

They also started producing heavy water, crap in reactors, f*****g deadly in bombs. The yanks want an aggresive stance against the Iranians, and might try to destroy the reactor. If they do, theyd better do it soon, cos it becomes operational in 6 months tops, and dropping a daisy cutter on it thens going to cover the middle east in fallout. Probably wiping out a good deal of the people there and taking a big, big, big meaty chunk out of the US military.

[Eltiraaz]

Link: I get the idea that you really don't like Bush. While I do think that he needs a clue, I don't actually hate him.

 

Could I respectfully ask what caused you feel that way?

 

BTW- I think that it's North Korea, that, or Bush will smote down the ungrateful Canadians!! :lol:

[Switch]

well, judging by the fact they're talking about Iran ATM, i reckon they'd go for them next, if they are planning on doing something more...

[link]

Bush is a brutal, stupid warmongerer who rigged the ballots so he could win, hes also very corrupt and is at the moment, getting thousands of soldier and civilians (mostly civilians, but they dont really matter to him) in the middle east. oh about the corruption part, lets just say, in the past his ancestors decided to start little companies, and so traded with the Nazis. Oh, and the Bin Ladens also did a Lot of investing in one of the Bush companies, must have been a coincudence eh.

[ThetaOrionis01]

Hmm...not sure if they have the resources to commit troops to either Iran or North Korea in the short term.

 

And once either of these countries have a nuclear capability they're fairly safe IMO.

 

So if I had to take a guess, I'd go for Syria...

 

... or perhaps some small island in the Caribbean with the defensive capability of a lemming after its sojourn over the edge of the cliff... :lol:

[link]

All of the above countries are in Bush's axis of evil. And the one lesson of the of the axis of evil is,

 

 

 

 

if you dont want to be attacked by America YOU HAVE TO HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS, OR YOURE GOING TO GET BLOW TO HELL AND BACK EVERY TIME YOU TELL THE YANKS YOU HAVE LOADS OF OIL

[Eltiraaz]

This is reminding me of another thread at MWC. This was posted by Albareth at MWC...

 

ROFL!!!   

 

This amused me to no end... 

----

 

Axis of Evil Wannabes

 

By John Cleese

 

"Bitter after being snubbed for membership in the "Axis of Evil," Libya,

China, and Syria today announced they had formed the "Axis of Just as 

Evil," which they said would be more evil than that stupid Iran-Iraq-North Korea

axis President Bush warned of in his State of the Union address.

 

Axis of Evil members, however, immediately dismissed the new axis as 

having, for starters, a really dumb name. "Right. They are Just as Evil... in 

their dreams!" declared North Korean leader Kim Jong-il. "Everybody knows we're

the best evils... best at being evil... we're the best." Diplomats from

Syria denied they were jealous over being excluded, although they 

conceded they did ask if they could join the Axis of Evil.

 

"They told us it was full," said Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. "An 

Axis can't have more than three countries," explained Iraqi President Saddam

Hussein. "This is not my rule, it's tradition. In World War II you had

Germany, Italy, and Japan in the evil Axis. So, you can only have three, 

and a secret handshake. Ours is wickedly cool."

 

International reaction to Bush's Axis of Evil declaration was swift, as

within minutes, France surrendered.

 

Elsewhere, peer-conscious nations rushed to gain triumvirate status in 

what became a game of geopolitical chairs.

 

Cuba, Sudan, and Serbia said they had formed the "Axis of Somewhat Evil,"

forcing Somalia to join with Uganda and Myanmar in the "Axis of 

Occasionally Evil," while Bulgaria, Indonesia and Russia established the "Axis of Not So Much Evil Really As Just Generally Disagreeable."

 

With the criteria suddenly expanded and all the desirable clubs filling

up... Sierra Leone, El Salvador, and Rwanda applied to be called the 

"Axis of Countries That Aren't the Worst But Certainly Won't Be Asked to Host 

the Olympics."

 

Canada, Mexico, and Australia formed the "Axis of Nations That Are 

Actually Quite Nice But Secretly Have Some Nasty Thoughts About America," while

Scotland, New Zealand and Spain established the "Axis of Countries That

Be Allowed to Ask Sheep to Wear Lipstick." "That's not a threat, really,

just something we like to do," said Scottish Executive First Minister 

Jack McConnell.

 

While wondering if the other nations of the world weren't perhaps making 

fun of him, a cautious Bush granted approval for most axis, although he 

rejected the establishment of the Axis of Countries Whose Names End in "Guay,"

accusing one of its members of filing a false application. Officials from

Paraguay, Uruguay, and Chadguay denied the charges.

 

Israel, meanwhile, insisted it didn't want to join any Axis, but

privately,world leaders said, that's only because no one asked them."

 

Oh, we had a few laughs over this...

[Adamastor]

im quite the pessimist and im not particlularly in love with bush so dont flame me too much. if bush has his way everyone that disagrees will be flatened. the only way he can solve problems is by flatening a country or two declaring everyone who lives there as evil... its also agreat way of covering up a crumbling economy, or any other little things that put a dark stain on his rule... sure the 'axis of evil' is probably the first to go but if bush is in power for long enough it wont end there...