lued123 Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 In response to post #47378955. #47379635, #47380245, #47380310, #47380615, #47380650, #47380665 are all replies on the same post.ShmooZ wrote: I say name it Nexus Mod Organizer!Elianora wrote: +1ThatDirtyShisno wrote: +1TacticalAce wrote: NMO sounds like MMO when spoken, just saying..nappilydeestructio wrote: +2lued123 wrote: +1 because we can call it NeMO.azraal wrote: Nah, the most important feature of mod organizer, the virtual file system, won't be here anyway, or so i read somewhere.So it can't really qualify to be called in a similar way... :)So instead, to make sure that even if Tannin is in the team, people don't get the wrong idea, how about NNMO which means NNMO is Not ModOrganizer (what? At least some of you will understand the joke. And maybe the joke inside the joke. But this one is common knowledge now).I don't think we've heard anything about whether it will have a variation of MO's file system. I imagine it will, at least as an option. The whole point of this merger is to take the best bits of both, not to dumb down MO by removing its main advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opusGlass Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 (edited) In response to post #47378955. #47379635, #47380245, #47380310, #47380615, #47380650, #47380665, #47380780, #47381020 are all replies on the same post.ShmooZ wrote: I say name it Nexus Mod Organizer!Elianora wrote: +1ThatDirtyShisno wrote: +1TacticalAce wrote: NMO sounds like MMO when spoken, just saying..nappilydeestructio wrote: +2lued123 wrote: +1 because we can call it NeMO.azraal wrote: Nah, the most important feature of mod organizer, the virtual file system, won't be here anyway, or so i read somewhere.So it can't really qualify to be called in a similar way... :)So instead, to make sure that even if Tannin is in the team, people don't get the wrong idea, how about NNMO which means NNMO is Not ModOrganizer (what? At least some of you will understand the joke. And maybe the joke inside the joke. But this one is common knowledge now).lued123 wrote: I don't think we've heard anything about whether it will have a variation of MO's file system. I imagine it will, at least as an option. The whole point of this merger is to take the best bits of both, not to dumb down MO by removing its main advantage.Dark0ne wrote: Just to nip this one in the bud so we don't get spammed with +1s, we won't be calling it Nexus Mod Organizer.Mainly because I simply don't like the name "Mod Organizer". Nothing against Tannin at all!So, consider that name vetoed.+1 the community has already been calling it this anywayAnd yeah I definitely expect a virtual file system, they did hire MO's developer to make it after all... Edited February 8, 2017 by opusGlass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark0ne Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 In response to post #47378955. #47379635, #47380245, #47380310, #47380615, #47380650, #47380665, #47380780, #47381010 are all replies on the same post.ShmooZ wrote: I say name it Nexus Mod Organizer!Elianora wrote: +1ThatDirtyShisno wrote: +1TacticalAce wrote: NMO sounds like MMO when spoken, just saying..nappilydeestructio wrote: +2lued123 wrote: +1 because we can call it NeMO.azraal wrote: Nah, the most important feature of mod organizer, the virtual file system, won't be here anyway, or so i read somewhere.So it can't really qualify to be called in a similar way... :)So instead, to make sure that even if Tannin is in the team, people don't get the wrong idea, how about NNMO which means NNMO is Not ModOrganizer (what? At least some of you will understand the joke. And maybe the joke inside the joke. But this one is common knowledge now).lued123 wrote: I don't think we've heard anything about whether it will have a variation of MO's file system. I imagine it will, at least as an option. The whole point of this merger is to take the best bits of both, not to dumb down MO by removing its main advantage.opusGlass wrote: +1 the community has already been calling it this anywayJust to nip this one in the bud so we don't get spammed with +1s, we won't be calling it Nexus Mod Organizer.Mainly because I simply don't like the name "Mod Organizer". Nothing against Tannin at all!So, consider that name vetoed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opusGlass Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 In response to post #47378955. #47379635, #47380245, #47380310, #47380615, #47380650, #47380665, #47380780, #47381010, #47381020 are all replies on the same post.ShmooZ wrote: I say name it Nexus Mod Organizer!Elianora wrote: +1ThatDirtyShisno wrote: +1TacticalAce wrote: NMO sounds like MMO when spoken, just saying..nappilydeestructio wrote: +2lued123 wrote: +1 because we can call it NeMO.azraal wrote: Nah, the most important feature of mod organizer, the virtual file system, won't be here anyway, or so i read somewhere.So it can't really qualify to be called in a similar way... :)So instead, to make sure that even if Tannin is in the team, people don't get the wrong idea, how about NNMO which means NNMO is Not ModOrganizer (what? At least some of you will understand the joke. And maybe the joke inside the joke. But this one is common knowledge now).lued123 wrote: I don't think we've heard anything about whether it will have a variation of MO's file system. I imagine it will, at least as an option. The whole point of this merger is to take the best bits of both, not to dumb down MO by removing its main advantage.opusGlass wrote: +1 the community has already been calling it this anywayAnd yeah I definitely expect a virtual file system, they did hire MO's developer to make it after all...Dark0ne wrote: Just to nip this one in the bud so we don't get spammed with +1s, we won't be calling it Nexus Mod Organizer.Mainly because I simply don't like the name "Mod Organizer". Nothing against Tannin at all!So, consider that name vetoed.Darn okay. Any confirmation for/against a virtual file system, Dark0ne? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattjus Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 In response to post #47378620. lued123 wrote: It's great to hear that things are coming along.Edit: And might I suggest you call it NEMO? NExus Mod Organizer? It's an appropriate name for a merger of Nexus Mod Manager and Mod Organizer, it sounds adorable, and it invokes the same "I'll use two letters if I want to," attitude that USLEEP had before it got ported to the Special Edition.+1 for NEMO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark0ne Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 (edited) In response to post #47378955. #47379635, #47380245, #47380310, #47380615, #47380650, #47380665, #47380780, #47381010, #47381020, #47381085 are all replies on the same post.ShmooZ wrote: I say name it Nexus Mod Organizer!Elianora wrote: +1ThatDirtyShisno wrote: +1TacticalAce wrote: NMO sounds like MMO when spoken, just saying..nappilydeestructio wrote: +2lued123 wrote: +1 because we can call it NeMO.azraal wrote: Nah, the most important feature of mod organizer, the virtual file system, won't be here anyway, or so i read somewhere.So it can't really qualify to be called in a similar way... :)So instead, to make sure that even if Tannin is in the team, people don't get the wrong idea, how about NNMO which means NNMO is Not ModOrganizer (what? At least some of you will understand the joke. And maybe the joke inside the joke. But this one is common knowledge now).lued123 wrote: I don't think we've heard anything about whether it will have a variation of MO's file system. I imagine it will, at least as an option. The whole point of this merger is to take the best bits of both, not to dumb down MO by removing its main advantage.opusGlass wrote: +1 the community has already been calling it this anywayAnd yeah I definitely expect a virtual file system, they did hire MO's developer to make it after all...Dark0ne wrote: Just to nip this one in the bud so we don't get spammed with +1s, we won't be calling it Nexus Mod Organizer.Mainly because I simply don't like the name "Mod Organizer". Nothing against Tannin at all!So, consider that name vetoed.opusGlass wrote: Darn okay. Any confirmation for/against a virtual file system, Dark0ne?As far as I know, and don't quote me on this, we plan to allow you to pick how you want the file management to work from a number of options, but some might not be done by launch.Similarly, we're making the software as open source and as easily extendible/extensible as possible, so if we don't do something, some devs could. Modding the mod manager, in essence. Modception. Edited February 8, 2017 by Dark0ne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pStyl3 Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Another name suggestion: ModNXAs in "Modern Nexus" and/or "Mods with Nexus". Also, are you guys already interested in people beta testing your new mod manager? I'm certainly interested in taking a peek at your new mod manager, and how well LOOT is working with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inawe Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 (edited) In response to post #47378955. #47379635, #47380245, #47380310, #47380615, #47380650, #47380665, #47380780, #47381010, #47381020, #47381085, #47381190, #47381380 are all replies on the same post.ShmooZ wrote: I say name it Nexus Mod Organizer!Elianora wrote: +1ThatDirtyShisno wrote: +1TacticalAce wrote: NMO sounds like MMO when spoken, just saying..nappilydeestructio wrote: +2lued123 wrote: +1 because we can call it NeMO.azraal wrote: Nah, the most important feature of mod organizer, the virtual file system, won't be here anyway, or so i read somewhere.So it can't really qualify to be called in a similar way... :)So instead, to make sure that even if Tannin is in the team, people don't get the wrong idea, how about NNMO which means NNMO is Not ModOrganizer (what? At least some of you will understand the joke. And maybe the joke inside the joke. But this one is common knowledge now).lued123 wrote: I don't think we've heard anything about whether it will have a variation of MO's file system. I imagine it will, at least as an option. The whole point of this merger is to take the best bits of both, not to dumb down MO by removing its main advantage.opusGlass wrote: +1 the community has already been calling it this anywayAnd yeah I definitely expect a virtual file system, they did hire MO's developer to make it after all...Dark0ne wrote: Just to nip this one in the bud so we don't get spammed with +1s, we won't be calling it Nexus Mod Organizer.Mainly because I simply don't like the name "Mod Organizer". Nothing against Tannin at all!So, consider that name vetoed.opusGlass wrote: Darn okay. Any confirmation for/against a virtual file system, Dark0ne?Dark0ne wrote: As far as I know, and don't quote me on this, we plan to allow you to pick how you want the file management to work from a number of options, but some might not be done by launch.Similarly, we're making the software as open source and as easily extendible/extensible as possible, so if we don't do something, some devs could. Modding the mod manager, in essence. Modception.Gribbleshnibit8 wrote: Seriously. This is the only thing that matters to me. While FOMM and NMM's installation method were OK, they were also awful, left (for Bethesda games) the game folder cluttered with files, and made it incredibly difficult to really get a handle on load order and precedence of loose files. Please do not steal from us the only good mod manager that has ever existed and replace it with something that isn't any better than the much older offerings.+1 My thought exactly.*edit*Didn't see Dark0ne's answer before posting. Nexus Mod Organizer made the most sense to me. Oh well... as long as it is able to use a virtual file system like MO, I'll use it, regardless of the name. Edited February 8, 2017 by inawe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribbleshnibit8 Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 In response to post #47378955. #47379635, #47380245, #47380310, #47380615, #47380650, #47380665, #47380780, #47381010, #47381020, #47381085, #47381190, #47381300 are all replies on the same post.ShmooZ wrote: I say name it Nexus Mod Organizer!Elianora wrote: +1ThatDirtyShisno wrote: +1TacticalAce wrote: NMO sounds like MMO when spoken, just saying..nappilydeestructio wrote: +2lued123 wrote: +1 because we can call it NeMO.azraal wrote: Nah, the most important feature of mod organizer, the virtual file system, won't be here anyway, or so i read somewhere.So it can't really qualify to be called in a similar way... :)So instead, to make sure that even if Tannin is in the team, people don't get the wrong idea, how about NNMO which means NNMO is Not ModOrganizer (what? At least some of you will understand the joke. And maybe the joke inside the joke. But this one is common knowledge now).lued123 wrote: I don't think we've heard anything about whether it will have a variation of MO's file system. I imagine it will, at least as an option. The whole point of this merger is to take the best bits of both, not to dumb down MO by removing its main advantage.opusGlass wrote: +1 the community has already been calling it this anywayAnd yeah I definitely expect a virtual file system, they did hire MO's developer to make it after all...Dark0ne wrote: Just to nip this one in the bud so we don't get spammed with +1s, we won't be calling it Nexus Mod Organizer.Mainly because I simply don't like the name "Mod Organizer". Nothing against Tannin at all!So, consider that name vetoed.opusGlass wrote: Darn okay. Any confirmation for/against a virtual file system, Dark0ne?Dark0ne wrote: As far as I know, and don't quote me on this, we plan to allow you to pick how you want the file management to work from a number of options, but some might not be done by launch.Similarly, we're making the software as open source and as easily extendible/extensible as possible, so if we don't do something, some devs could. Modding the mod manager, in essence. Modception.inawe wrote: +1 My thought exactly.Seriously. This is the only thing that matters to me. While FOMM and NMM's installation method were OK, they were also awful, left (for Bethesda games) the game folder cluttered with files, and made it incredibly difficult to really get a handle on load order and precedence of loose files. Please do not steal from us the only good mod manager that has ever existed and replace it with something that isn't any better than the much older offerings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opusGlass Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 (edited) In response to post #47379835. TacticalAce wrote: Very nice! So basically most of the hard work is done and you guys need someone to make it look pretty. I hope you guys can get a UI designer soon, I have been absolutly fiending for this mod manager to release. I was an avid mod organizer user but decided for SSE I would just wait for the new fully supported mod manager. Seems Like its still a couple of months off but its good to know progress has been great! Thank You!If you're wanting something simple to tide you over, try out my tool, BMO. It's on the Skyrim Special Edition site. I plan to switch to NMM2 if it's decent but this is a nice, non-invasive way to keep your mods separate and organized in the mean time. (Disclaimer: intended for advanced users, most people probably won't like it.) Edited February 8, 2017 by opusGlass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts