Google

[TheMastersSon]

Suggestions?!

Everyone knows what the solution is to the Google problem, because in 240 years of history nobody has ever found a third alternative to our two choices for common carrier utility traffic. It must either be regulated and protected by law, or the medium will be effectively and practically lost to the appropriately (imo) infinite and inexorable corporate profit motive. I've explained and repeated this point too many times already in other threads in this forum. Not only the primary but very close to the exclusive force pushing for that second above option is the now obsolete and mostly sold off entertainment establishment from last century (Comcast bought NBC, AT&T is now trying to buy Time-Warner etc). Therefore the first and prerequisite step in the long-term protection of internet traffic is to abolish the current legality of allowing this establishment to also be our internet providers. Regardless of what Comcast might claim, they are a cable TV company, so their primary goal can only be to convert the internet into just an alternate delivery system for cable TV. Their conflicts of interest are obvious, fundamental and inherent to their core business.

 

Step two is what the FCC already did under our last president: they corrected the classification for internet traffic from its former and undefined by law status of an "information service" (thank you Supreme Court) to its actual status as one of the most critical common carrier utilities in the world today. This reclassification is also a prerequisite step to protect the internet, since Title I/II and other government protections depend on it, and it's specifically what puts the legal teeth into the FCC's protection. Last I heard Trump's Verizon FCC had reversed it, more mud on their already filthy reputations for the history books.

 

The third step is to demand our federal government stop not only allowing but specifically facilitating Google's monopoly global control over internet searches and consumer choice. I was going to say in what country, but on what PLANET should a single company that holds practical monopoly control over internet searches be allowed to manipulate these results to their own best interest? IMO future historians will be brutal to us and deservedly so.

 

And lastly, end user final control over internet navigation must be mandated by law. It not only should be, it must and eventually will be illegal for anyone to intentionally interfere with or deny delivery of legal end user internet traffic, exactly as it's illegal to do the same with postal mail and phone calls in our country. Again I'm repeating myself from other discussions so I'll stop.

Edited December 11, 2017 by TheMastersSon

[Deleted54170User]

I understand.

 

Solution? Again. Devise a plan. Instead of pasting posters up to find someone that isn't already working in their kindergarten class to allow cell phones to play video games on instead of the old building blocks with letters and numbers, weaving squares to make pot holders for stay at home Moms, water colors to finger paint with, modeling clay to make sculptures, toys that can be used to make a miniature city, and they can drive a toy motorless vehicle around the lego streets too.

 

AI driven vehicles do not need children with RC skills. Nor will a drone pizza deliverer need a child with RC skills. Are you aware of anything in the department of Schools that is giving children in Kindergarten a view of the community, "Solar (and fully auto-piloted vehicles) City"?

[twowolves80]

I understand.

 

Solution? Again. Devise a plan. Instead of pasting posters up to find someone that isn't already working in their kindergarten class to allow cell phones to play video games on instead of the old building blocks with letters and numbers, weaving squares to make pot holders for stay at home Moms, water colors to finger paint with, modeling clay to make sculptures, toys that can be used to make a miniature city, and they can drive a toy motorless vehicle around the lego streets too.

 

AI driven vehicles do not need children with RC skills. Nor will a drone pizza deliverer need a child with RC skills. Are you aware of anything in the department of Schools that is giving children in Kindergarten a view of the community, "Solar (and fully auto-piloted vehicles) City"?

 

Wth does that even mean? Dude, stop with this. Speak plainly because you're not even finishing your sentences. I can't make heads or tails of anything you just said. If you're relying upon Google Translate, it's failing. Miserably. (Ironic, isn't it? In a thread about Google lol)

 

 

[Deleted54170User]

 

I understand.

 

Solution? Again. Devise a plan. Instead of pasting posters up to find someone that isn't already working in their kindergarten class to allow cell phones to play video games on instead of the old building blocks with letters and numbers, weaving squares to make pot holders for stay at home Moms, water colors to finger paint with, modeling clay to make sculptures, toys that can be used to make a miniature city, and they can drive a toy motorless vehicle around the lego streets too.

 

AI driven vehicles do not need children with RC skills. Nor will a drone pizza deliverer need a child with RC skills. Are you aware of anything in the department of Schools that is giving children in Kindergarten a view of the community, "Solar (and fully auto-piloted vehicles) City"?

 

Wth does that even mean? Dude, stop with this. Speak plainly because you're not even finishing your sentences. I can't make heads or tails of anything you just said. If you're relying upon Google Translate, it's failing. Miserably. (Ironic, isn't it? In a thread about Google lol)

 

 

 

 

Everybody in the school I went to understood my point. Because we are all from the same team. We think almost alike, because we have been around each other for long enough to get the drift of our thoughts and ideas.

 

I'll point out the meaning of all my clipped sentences so even a scholar of conspiracy theories will understands.

 

Either you advertise to the crowd that is likely to become excited and do something with the information everyone here is dipping into about Google's overpowering the Internet so it moves them to action or nothing will happen.

 

Themastersson made it very clear in his last post he has done this same old same old post a number of times in the Forums.nexusmods dot com. If themasterson thinks he can make a difference he needs to get out of this media and go to work where there are real flesh and blood people to aid him in the great revolution. It is either time for him and the lot who he believes will follow to make a bunch of money so that the tables he wants turned will turn in the favor of the Net Neutrality group.

 

The net-neutrality group I met up with back when it was a rage on campus lost their appeal, so now there isn't enough people, civilians, to rally to the call.

[TheMastersSon]

Themastersson made it very clear in his last post he has done this same old same old post a number of times in the Forums.nexusmods dot com. If themasterson thinks he can make a difference he needs to get out of this media and go to work where there are real flesh and blood people to aid him in the great revolution. It is either time for him and the lot who he believes will follow to make a bunch of money so that the tables he wants turned will turn in the favor of the Net Neutrality group.

 

The net-neutrality group I met up with back when it was a rage on campus lost their appeal, so now there isn't enough people, civilians, to rally to the call.

With regard to the American people this is about the defense and protection of our constitutional rights for internet traffic. Not money, as is the case with last century's cable TV, media and entertainment establishments. It's why the situation is destined to get worse before it gets better, and until Trump's traitors in our FCC can be replaced with actual representatives of the people instead of just Comcast and Disney and Rupert Murdoch.

 

As for methods and choice of venues to express my opinions, it would help if you actually knew something about these before you start assuming things. This site is for gaming and enjoyment and political discussion is allowed in a few forums. It's certainly not for political change or to foment revolution. It's evolution not revolution and nothing anyone says or does can or will change it, in the long-term. I'm just trying to minimize the period of time between subjugation of our constitutional rights by private industry and the inevitable popular outrage and demand for government protection of these rights. Just as happened with our landline telephone traffic and network last century.

Edited December 27, 2017 by TheMastersSon

[twowolves80]

Your point was lost in a run-on sentence that didn't even conclude itself, imo. Hyperbole will not win hearts; pointing out all the contradictions and showing just how deep the deception runs will.

 

Merriam-Webster defines conspiracy as:

1. the act of conspiring together;

2. an agreement among conspirators;

3. a group of conspirators.

 

Merriam-Webster also defines theory as:

1 : a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation

2 : an unproved assumption : conjecture

3 : a body of theorems presenting a concise systematic view of a subject

4 : the general or abstract principles of a body of fact, a science, or an art

5 : abstract thought : speculation

6 : the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another

Therefore, conspiracy theory is nothing but a working set of hypotheses used to formulate a logical solution to the too-many-to-be-coincidental statements, actions, and trail of blood and money of the few who wield power over the many.

I am not in a position to take political action as I have a lot more to lose than most. However, if you'll notice once thing about all these books, and allow me to point it out: All these books, like Crossing the Rubicon, Behold A Pale Horse, and Hunt For Zero Point, have published theories that, if true, would mean we've been systematically lied to by the government we put into power over us, often illegally.

And yet, not a single one of them has been sued by the US Government for libel.

My guess is because while the government might try to argue the fallacy of one point, other things would come to light during any trial that would be damning and would require closed-door inquiries by a Senate Intelligence committee.

So, having this information in hand, what do I do with it? What can I do? It wouldn't matter if the entire citizenry of this country signed a petition, 400,000,000 names strong demanding the release of classified information on field propulsion and advanced directed energy weapons. The intelligence community would laugh, say (truthfully) we don't know anything about that, and file your petition in the trash. Yes, it is true that most low-level grunts answering FOIAs and petitions wouldn't know about the existence of that research because it's compartmentalized to an astonishing degree.

I am merely pointing out the connections I see in the hopes that someone else takes the torch and runs with it. I find it hysterically funny that the intelligence community can't even get their crap together on wikipedia. There's stuff in there that doesn't match official documents, or is written in such a way so as to mislead.

Big Brother is here, and the tighter the noose gets, the harder it will be to escape when the citizenry finally wake up.

[Deleted54170User]

Thanks for the help. That's all I needed.

[TheMastersSon]

Anyone seen or know Google's response to this FCC decision? Have they issued one yet? We looked online without any luck, and their apparent silence is deafening considering they are the other major player in this fascist, concerted and conspired treason. And again by fascist I mean the word in its literal, technical and practical form, not its usual raging/left-wing/everything-is-somebody-else's-fault/universal-victim form which I myself am physically allergic to. I think at least some of the current media silence on this issue (according to our regular news sites) is due to sheer shock and disbelief and most probable denial of what our FCC just did. It will with great speed sink in when our internet functionality starts being not only limited but castrated, by last century's cable TV and media/entertainment establishments. Please ask Orrin Hatch and Rupert Murdoch (in that order) for more details, but don't ask our current president or FCC Chair, because they will give you a speech directly from the desk of Karl Rove about our consumer choice being somehow protected by this nearly unprecedented treason and absolutely unprecedented and unqualified destruction of consumer choice. Just as Iraq is what happens when you give the White House to oil executives, this is what happens when the White House is given to last century's cable TV, media and entertainment industries. I sincerely don't know who contributes more to the campaign coffers of these prostituted traitors. Or what company would intentionally and repeatedly refuse to release available NBC broadcast footage of a candidate that would have easily knocked him out of a presidential bid. Etc. Edited December 22, 2017 by TheMastersSon

[twowolves80]

Fascism is more properly called Coporatism, for it is the merger of State and Corporate power. --Mussolini (disputed)

IF, and that's a big if, Google wakes up and remembers its mission statement, it would be a vast bastion against the government, but it would take a visionary from within. Man, would that generate them some revenue. lol

Edited December 23, 2017 by twowolves80