This has happened in the past and is occurring today, but by what methods is it carried out currently in western countries today? An Example how this works: If a demonstration occurs and the police send undercover agents into the ranks of demonstrators to provoke violent activities in the ranks of demonstrators against the police, so that the later move in with force to put the demonstration down. The resultant action damages the validity of the activist's contention. Now on hypothetical basis what would happen, if a western state would try to suppress by this methodology a human rights activist, that is fighting within the boundary's of laws for a oppressed minority today? What if Government, Judges, Political Parties, the Media and some of the citizens view that activist as traitor and want desperately to get his reputation impugned or the send the activist to jail so that problems of the minority shall not be viewed in public and debated.? While the activist is trying to let the citizens see that their lawsuit is abused in their name to oppress a minority, or in such way carried out (on paper the laws exists, but in practice they are never carried out) that it becomes lip service to those that belong to a minority, that is in such away oppressed. I now ask the community here to debate how a western government carries this out today, what damage does it cause to human rights and what can be done against it legally? How is it that a human rights activist can be publicly viewed as savior (by a oppressed minority) or traitor (by the oppressing majority)?