HeyYou

Then you REALLY don't need cleanmem........

For the first: Get Better Console. Then, simply drop one of the guns, open the console, click on the gun, and it will tell you all sorts of useful information. For the second..... No clue. :)

Do you have the Fallout 4 script extender installed? Are you starting the game with the FOSE_loader?

Wabbajack, automaton, and others of that nature, were designed and built for the folks that, for whatever reason, don't want to spend the time picking and choosing mods, installing them, then convincing them to play nice together. They are aimed at 'casual gamers', and folks with time constraints, that prevent them from spending the time getting their load order perfect, and their game stable. That's all on the mod-pack author. Remains to be seen just how well its all going to shake out..... I suspect, as they become more popular, and more mod packs become available, there will be some that are really good, some that are merely ok, some that aren't so good, and others that just suck..... Will the author support his mod pack? Will he/she keep it updated? Or is that all going to end up on the authors of the individual mods themselves? (which is one of the major points of contention mod authors have with the system......) Personally, I think the automated installers ARE going to become a 'thing'. Players will like them, because it will give them an opportunity to play a modded game, without the steep learning curve that goes with it. Just click some buttons, let the tool do its thing, and off they go, with their nicely modded game. (hopefully.....) So, folks that normally wouldn't, for whatever reason, mod their game, will now be able to do so. That will bring more traffic to the various download sites. For Nexus, it will definitely mean more traffic, and given the way automated downloads are set up here, it will prompt some of those folks to spring for a premium account. Which puts money in their pocket..... I don't see them saying "No" to that. So, the system does have some advantages. A fair few mod authors though, disagree. Some, vehemently disagree...... and have gone so far as to remove their mods from here, and uploaded them to other places, that DON'T support the automated downloads. (beth, for instance.) Should be interesting to see how things develop.

It's patently obvious that the world can't possibly be flat..... If it were, cats would have knocked everything off the edge by now.

Modders leaving while slamming the door, is not really a new thing. And who can blame them? With that said. If you set yourself up as an 'pro' modder/semi business, people are going to expect a lot from you. And some have an tendency to think that they are some kind of NexusJesus. Entitlement all around sours the whole thing. Its the users that drive most of them away. Demanding this, that, and the other thing, from a person that provides them with their work, for FREE. I will grant you that we do indeed have some authors that are prima donnas, but, they are a TINY minority of the 70 thousand plus authors that host here.

As I understand your position: It's cheaper to buy raw materials elsewhere because it costs too much to produce at home. It costs too much to mine and process the raw materials at home because of government interference. When the government interference is eliminated, It's still cheaper to buy the raw materials elsewhere. So the government regulations and their impact on production costs are not the driving force when it comes to purchasing raw materials off shore. Reread what I wrote. The EPA has relaxed SOME of the restrictions, but, there are still MANY in place. The EPA didn't simply dry up, and blow away, they are still there, over-regulating as usual. And yes, it is currently still cheaper to buy from China, than to produce in the US. EPA is one major driving factor there. Labor rates, and such, are another. All of the restrictions on tailing maintenance and runoff, heavy metal runoff, ground and surface water contamination, open pit recovery, well integrity, well spillage and containment, pumping emissions, and sensitive environment protection have all been eliminated or watered down to the point of non-existent. And all the punitive language in EPA regulations has been declared null and void. So which regulations are left? Ok, that covers mining. You do understand that is only the first step, right? Still need to refine it into a usable form.

That is definitely possible, and there are some awesome backpacks out there in the world, but, so far as I know, they just add to your carry weight. I like this idea, and if I were better at scripting, I would give it a shot. But, I suck at papyrus..... :D

If it was deleted by staff, and you upload it, you will be banned. If it was deleted by the author, and you upload it without permission, you will be banned. Nexus hosts mods so long as they don't violate their terms of service, and the author wants to keep it up. If the author doesn't want it here, then nexus would be in violation of various laws if they kept it up, regardless of the COPYRIGHT holders wishes.

Yeah, both ingredients have both effects, so, so does the potion. There is a perk higher up to remove harmful effects from supposedly beneficial potions, and vice versa as well. Unfortunately, you don't get to pick which one you get, just have to be careful in your ingredient selection.

I think there is a troubleshooting guide for downloads around here somewhere...... Check the Site Issues forum.

Actually, there are laws on the books that SHOULD prevent exactly that. However, due to various other laws that are in place, doctors CAN'T inform any government agency that their patient shouldn't be allowed to own weapons. Patients tend to sue over privacy concerns, and that whole 'doctor/patient privilege' thing. So far, I have been unable to find any statistics on how many of those legally purchased weapons, were in the hands of someone that SHOULDN'T have been able to have one. (the newtown shooter being right at the top of that list. His MOM bought it for him......) The new york shooter a couple years back had his girlfriend buy his. (he was a convicted felon, not too long out of prison...... so, shouldn't have had a weapon either.) The two california shooters (also several years back) did indeed legally purchase their weapons, and then applied modifications that made them patently illegal. (in california......) And then we have the whole "not telling the right people" that someone shouldn't be able to purchase firearms..... (the guy that was discharged from the airforce for mental issues, and the AF never bothered to inform anyone about it.) Now, the Vegas shooter...... No criminal history, no history of mental issues, yet he still holds the record for number of dead. (in the US.....) Of course, we have the conspiracy theorists claiming he was a patsy..... but, there is zero proof of that.... and interest in that evaporated fairly quickly. (at least, in the public eye.) And then we have the fact that mass shooting deaths are a VERY tiny percentage of all firearm deaths....... More than half are suicides, of the rest, most are gang related, and handguns are the primary weapon. Long guns in general, which includes 'assault rifles', account for around 3% of all firearm deaths. The 'assault rifles' are a tiny subset of the 'long guns' category. Banning them will have zero effect on murder rate. I'm all for more weapons in the us. Let that God forsaken loveless place tear itself apart from the inside. Most of you are going to hell, I'm 100% sure of it. You are heretics who worships power and money. Me too. I am a firm believer in An armed society, is a polite society. Guns don't automatically mean crime. I would point out, that the cities with the highest murder rate, are uniformly democrat run, with severe restrictions on gun ownership. And we are quite happy that you DON'T live here. We hope you don't come for a visit either. We have too many left wing-nuts as it is. Don't be too harsh. I was once a rebel without a clue... With age comes wisdom..if it doesn't you will have a frustrating existence. I bought several clues when they were on sale at Meijers. The ones I got from Wal-Mart were made in china, and were essentially worthless. And yes, I AM 'old'...... But, I live out in the country, with no really large cities nearby, so, seeing trucks with gun racks with actual guns in them, isn't unusual. Though a lot rarer that it used to be....... Society was a LOT different when I grew up, and I really don't care for the direction it has been going of late. (last couple decades or so.....) So I associate 'armed', with 'safer'.

As I understand your position: It's cheaper to buy raw materials elsewhere because it costs too much to produce at home. It costs too much to mine and process the raw materials at home because of government interference. When the government interference is eliminated, It's still cheaper to buy the raw materials elsewhere. So the government regulations and their impact on production costs are not the driving force when it comes to purchasing raw materials off shore. Reread what I wrote. The EPA has relaxed SOME of the restrictions, but, there are still MANY in place. The EPA didn't simply dry up, and blow away, they are still there, over-regulating as usual. And yes, it is currently still cheaper to buy from China, than to produce in the US. EPA is one major driving factor there. Labor rates, and such, are another.

Actually, there are laws on the books that SHOULD prevent exactly that. However, due to various other laws that are in place, doctors CAN'T inform any government agency that their patient shouldn't be allowed to own weapons. Patients tend to sue over privacy concerns, and that whole 'doctor/patient privilege' thing. So far, I have been unable to find any statistics on how many of those legally purchased weapons, were in the hands of someone that SHOULDN'T have been able to have one. (the newtown shooter being right at the top of that list. His MOM bought it for him......) The new york shooter a couple years back had his girlfriend buy his. (he was a convicted felon, not too long out of prison...... so, shouldn't have had a weapon either.) The two california shooters (also several years back) did indeed legally purchase their weapons, and then applied modifications that made them patently illegal. (in california......) And then we have the whole "not telling the right people" that someone shouldn't be able to purchase firearms..... (the guy that was discharged from the airforce for mental issues, and the AF never bothered to inform anyone about it.) Now, the Vegas shooter...... No criminal history, no history of mental issues, yet he still holds the record for number of dead. (in the US.....) Of course, we have the conspiracy theorists claiming he was a patsy..... but, there is zero proof of that.... and interest in that evaporated fairly quickly. (at least, in the public eye.) And then we have the fact that mass shooting deaths are a VERY tiny percentage of all firearm deaths....... More than half are suicides, of the rest, most are gang related, and handguns are the primary weapon. Long guns in general, which includes 'assault rifles', account for around 3% of all firearm deaths. The 'assault rifles' are a tiny subset of the 'long guns' category. Banning them will have zero effect on murder rate. I'm all for more weapons in the us. Let that God forsaken loveless place tear itself apart from the inside. Most of you are going to hell, I'm 100% sure of it. You are heretics who worships power and money. Me too. I am a firm believer in An armed society, is a polite society. Guns don't automatically mean crime. I would point out, that the cities with the highest murder rate, are uniformly democrat run, with severe restrictions on gun ownership. And we are quite happy that you DON'T live here. We hope you don't come for a visit either. We have too many left wing-nuts as it is.

PM whomever it was that posted the screenshot. :)

Try running without cleanmem. How much ram do you have in your system?

Actually, there are laws on the books that SHOULD prevent exactly that. However, due to various other laws that are in place, doctors CAN'T inform any government agency that their patient shouldn't be allowed to own weapons. Patients tend to sue over privacy concerns, and that whole 'doctor/patient privilege' thing. So far, I have been unable to find any statistics on how many of those legally purchased weapons, were in the hands of someone that SHOULDN'T have been able to have one. (the newtown shooter being right at the top of that list. His MOM bought it for him......) The new york shooter a couple years back had his girlfriend buy his. (he was a convicted felon, not too long out of prison...... so, shouldn't have had a weapon either.) The two california shooters (also several years back) did indeed legally purchase their weapons, and then applied modifications that made them patently illegal. (in california......) And then we have the whole "not telling the right people" that someone shouldn't be able to purchase firearms..... (the guy that was discharged from the airforce for mental issues, and the AF never bothered to inform anyone about it.) Now, the Vegas shooter...... No criminal history, no history of mental issues, yet he still holds the record for number of dead. (in the US.....) Of course, we have the conspiracy theorists claiming he was a patsy..... but, there is zero proof of that.... and interest in that evaporated fairly quickly. (at least, in the public eye.) And then we have the fact that mass shooting deaths are a VERY tiny percentage of all firearm deaths....... More than half are suicides, of the rest, most are gang related, and handguns are the primary weapon. Long guns in general, which includes 'assault rifles', account for around 3% of all firearm deaths. The 'assault rifles' are a tiny subset of the 'long guns' category. Banning them will have zero effect on murder rate.

A large portion of the EPA regulations for environmental protections have been rolled back or eliminated in the past couple of years, making mineral, coal and oil exploitation pretty much wide open. Further, the US Department of the Interior and it's Bureau of Land Management was given a tonne of public lands reclaimed from eliminated National Parks, National Forests and National Monuments, which DOI and BLM then sold to private mining companies for exploitation. So is that old, tired, "but the government and the EPA won't let me ...", argument still valid? Currently. Yes. It is. Various companies may now own mining rights to what was once public land, but, so far as I have been able to determine, no one is exploiting that, as yet. It's still cheaper/easier to source those materials from China..... (who is one of the VERY few producers of such.....) At one point, china was making noises about dramatically reducing exports of those materials, but, so far, they haven't gotten as tight as they were at first considering. So, so long as getting them from China is cheaper than producing them here at home, no one is going to bother producing them here. And it isn't such "The EPA won't let me." as it is "The EPA has made it too expensive to be profitable." The EPA and their regulations have been eliminated or reduced to the point of almost non-existent, so how is it that the EPA is still impacting the exploitation of minerals, coal, oil, an other natural resources? That goes back to the whole "cheaper to buy it somewhere else, than produce it at home." And while some of the regulations have been rolled back, not all of them have.

A large portion of the EPA regulations for environmental protections have been rolled back or eliminated in the past couple of years, making mineral, coal and oil exploitation pretty much wide open. Further, the US Department of the Interior and it's Bureau of Land Management was given a tonne of public lands reclaimed from eliminated National Parks, National Forests and National Monuments, which DOI and BLM then sold to private mining companies for exploitation. So is that old, tired, "but the government and the EPA won't let me ...", argument still valid? Currently. Yes. It is. Various companies may now own mining rights to what was once public land, but, so far as I have been able to determine, no one is exploiting that, as yet. It's still cheaper/easier to source those materials from China..... (who is one of the VERY few producers of such.....) At one point, china was making noises about dramatically reducing exports of those materials, but, so far, they haven't gotten as tight as they were at first considering. So, so long as getting them from China is cheaper than producing them here at home, no one is going to bother producing them here. And it isn't such "The EPA won't let me." as it is "The EPA has made it too expensive to be profitable."

Protecting your family and your self implies preventing the psychopaths from buying a fire weapon something the republicans/fascist keep refusing even after the Newtown massacre. Protecting your family implies ensuring your relatives won't be killed be a stray bullet, something that woudn't happen if the firearms were no longer on free sale and people would defend themselves using self-defense and martial arts for example. Right. And banning guns will make sure the criminals don't have them........ I am sure, in your mind, that is true. Unfortunately, out here in the REAL world, that simply isn't the case. It would be impossible to remove all the guns in private hands, legal or not, here in the US. There are 350 million and change people here, and a similar number of guns. The only feasible way to make sure you got ALL the guns, would be a door to door search of EVERY residence. That simply isn't going to happen, as the american people wouldn't stand for it. If it was attempted, all it would accomplish is starting the second civil war. Given which side has the guns, who do you think would win that one? And please don't suggest we use the Military to do it, as that would require a constitutional amendment first. There simply are not enough police here to accomplish it. Not to mention that a pretty significant percentage of the police (or military, for that matter) would refuse to carry out such orders. And marital arts? Or some such for self defense? Right, I am 59 years old, and suffer from MS. Martial arts simply are not an option. The ONLY viable means of self defense available to me, is a firearm. Call the police? Yeah, right. If the cops could get here within 30 minutes of the call, I would be greatly surprised. By the time they got here, the would be just in time to clean up the mess, and it would be all over for me, and my family. Firearms are also used approximately 2.5 million times per year to PREVENT a crime. Statistics on that aren't particularly accurate, as a good percentage of such uses are simply not reported, as there is no need to. If someone pulls their gun, and the person with bad intent leaves, that's the end of it. (no shots fired.) You don't like guns? That's fine. Don't buy one. But do not presume to think I will take lightly your attempts to infringe on my constitutional rights.

The major reason a lot of the resources we need for our industrial sector are scarce here, is because our government has made it unprofitable to produce them. We have plenty of rare earth minerals here in the US, but, the EPA has regulated them out of existence.

Did Dogmeat come into the apartment with you? Or should he be waiting outside?

Using any scrapping mods? You could just scrap those three houses. :)

Version check issue? (from the game itself.)

Outdated version of alternate settlements, and it looks like you are missing the patch for it as well. (see the warning at the bottom of your second screenshot.)