edgeburner Posted September 4, 2014 Share Posted September 4, 2014 "90% + of climatologist agree on the anthropogenic angle of so-called "global warming" ?BullSh*t!!......Petition a certain university in Australia to release the actual numbers? Or, how they fudged the data?The fact is that the planet has not warmed in over 17 years. That is not what the vaunted 'climate models' predicted. Even though hundreds of thousands/millions of our hard earned (US) tax dollars went into "upgrading" those computer models.It's time to get the Tom Styer and the Al Gore - types out of climate science. They, and their agendas, are detriment to scienceIt's time to stop referring those who are skeptical about the selectively published results of modern climate science as "deniers" and accept their findings as legitimate for debate?After-all, Isn't that what science is all about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 (edited) HA HA don't get me started on Global Warming Edited September 5, 2014 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimboUK Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 It's become a religion so the science doesn't matter, look at the way scientists who question alarmist doctrine are treated, they're ostracised and treated like heretics. We know fabricated and flawed data has been used in the models alarmists use and as any fool knows, when it comes to computers it's garbage in, garbage out, keeps the funding coming in though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 (edited) As i posted several videos mentioning that very fact, the computer models and false science they are pushing is laughable, one reason to never trust mainstream science at all, it is a religion as you claim. Anything that contradicts their findings will be tossed, always be on the look out for the unusual, because usually its correct. Its not just weather, its the whole thing, NASA included. Be open to new ideas. But there is sign of change and change is good, a change for the better.. Evidence so good even mainstream can't refuse, because space hides many secrets. Example http://www.space.com/27009-electric-moon-sparks-lunar-dirt.html This rocks the very foundation of cosmologyThe age of information, the internet will help you bypass anything you think is wrong, let it guide you :teehee: Edited September 5, 2014 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgeburner Posted September 17, 2014 Author Share Posted September 17, 2014 Aye....funding is one of the major keys, along with the power agenda of the "green" billionaires who wish to control energy resources.....many of whom are absolute hypocrites that have made billions off of fossil fuels in other nations.The fact is that our understanding of exactly how our global climate functions is still in it's infancy. Even the "proxy" data (such as ice cores and tree rings) they claim to support their hypothesis have failed them miserably.One prime example is in my home state in the US.....Our Governor (at the time) actually told our state climatologist (who is a climate skeptic) that he could not use his earned title as 'state climatologist ' when speaking in public climate forums. If that isn't an example of politics poisoning science......Please! Tell me what is?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 (edited) When politics get in the way of scientists finding or results, then we have a bigger problem on our hands. Edited September 17, 2014 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeyYou Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Global warming IS a political issue. And that's about it. So far, no one has come up with convincing evidence, (that wasn't fabricated/manipulated) or, a climate model that actually works. This is simply a cash cow for researchers, and another method of potential control for the politicians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgeburner Posted September 17, 2014 Author Share Posted September 17, 2014 When politics get in the way of scientists finding or results, then we have a bigger problem on our hands. No doubt! When $$$$$/agenda become the driving force in scientific 'discovery', then we have an absolute problem. Scientist will no longer uncover (or, make public) new and exciting data, they will be subject to the whims and censorship of the power mongers ...... Already happening as far as I'm concerned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edgeburner Posted September 17, 2014 Author Share Posted September 17, 2014 (edited) Global warming IS a political issue. And that's about it. So far, no one has come up with convincing evidence, (that wasn't fabricated/manipulated) or, a climate model that actually works. This is simply a cash cow for researchers, and another method of potential control for the politicians.Yup. But, alas.....all of the dirty deeds executed by the NASA's Goddard Institute, the UN's IPCC, and, let's not forget the Obama administration .....too many to comprehend ! While the climate-gate e-mails may not reveal a smoking gun, the smell of cordite /gun powder hangs heavy in the air. And, the actions of greenie billionaires hypocrites such as Tom Steyer have really hurt Americans, in the wallet as well as on the job front. Another thing.....I'm all for alternative - clean energy.....when is actually viable as an energy source....when it's ready for prime-time. The fact is, it's (solar and wind) not viable at the present time. Yet, our tax dollars must subsidize them.....So they can stay afloat (cause their products cannot pluck on their own merit) and charge us more in the future... While they close down affordable/proven energy providers such as coal plants??...Why not spend some of those dirty dollars on aiding coal plants to burn cleaner?? Y'know, as a stop-gap till we can make the wind farms (ewwgly, yuck...Friggin bird choppers) and solar panel industry viable on the merit of their product? Make to much effin sense? Edited September 17, 2014 by edgeburner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor. Posted September 18, 2014 Share Posted September 18, 2014 (edited) All this cover up for the climate control like global warming nonsense, makes you wonder what they are so afraid of that would hurt their very foundation of global warming. Sense there is so much censorship it makes me wonder if there is a problem at all, if not as bad as the a the science-aka religion agenda is so afraid of, Is it so they could control and scare people??. I see through stuff like this pretty easy, and question why all of the secrecy, could what i have posted be true, ya probably. Its pretty easy to see fear in a politician when it goes against their believes global warming, its a belief is all that it is. Could it be so controversial to global warming that the government fears the real science, so they cover it up by silencing them.. Harper here In Canada is well known to do just that very thingNever trust Nasa or IPCC, trust NOAH instead, and the weather network. Edited September 18, 2014 by Thor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now